Discussion:
Aren't we far beyond slavery and the Holocaust?
(too old to reply)
_ G O D _
2006-03-25 00:36:28 UTC
Permalink
Aren't we far beyond slavery and the Holocaust?
by MARIA M. FLORES
***@yahoo.com

http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=410317

Whew.
I had just finished reading the 306-page immigration
reform bill that came out of the Senate recently - the
analyses, comparisons with the bills it incorporated,
changes, etc. - and I sat to write this. It is frustrating
and very disappointing.
Perhaps what will finally come out of the Senate may
not look anything like the proposed legislation from a
few weeks ago. The Senate is usually more reasonable
than the House. Or is it?
Unfortunately, the Senate legislation incorporated way
too much of HR 4437, the bill passed by the House
last year. Remember that one?
Among the numerous unrealistic provisions, that radical
bill included a bizarre provision to criminalize people
with undocumented status and those who "assist" them -
which would include family members, clergy, lawyers,
doctors, social workers, bankers and business owners.
It would be very possible that lawmakers and police
officers also would be at risk at some point. It was a
shocking provision, but upon reflection, I realized it is
not new to this country. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850
imposed harsh penalties on people with knowledge
of or who hid a runaway slave. The penalties included
up to six months in prison and up to a $1,000 fine, a
princely sum at the time. It was a very serious crime to
"harbor" a runaway slave, even if it was just knowledge.
Adolf Hitler took a cue from those laws and adapted
them to 1930s Germany. As his elite Schutzstaffel, or
SS guard, grew, it took non-Jews into custody and to
certain death for harboring Jews from the regime.
Perhaps most people would agree that hiding a slave or a Jewish person was a great
moral issue of those times. Those were knowing, intentional acts. A person
"assisting" an undocumented immigrant may not necessarily know the person is
undocumented. It won't matter, though.
The current "reform" is a direct strike against faith communities everywhere. The
Gamaliel Foundation, which is a nationwide, faith-based social justice organization,
has set out four points grounded in morality and the teachings of various religious
faiths that encompass true immigration reform.
Reform must include social and linguistic integration into our society, expanded
family and worker visas, a pathway to earned legalization for those already here and,
most importantly, smart enforcement, not sensational, unworkable tactics.
An amnesty component to legislation is not true reform; on the other end of the
radical scale, unusual, unreasonable, unbelievable and unworkable sanctions against
undocumented immigrants and legal residents is not true reform.
There is a bill out there that comes incredibly close to true immigration
reform, grounded in sane, intelligent rhetoric and moral, constitutional and
reasonable principles. That bill, S 1033, commonly referred to as the McCain-Kennedy
bill, is somewhat incorporated into the new Senate bill, but not enough. Obtuse
lawmakers want to take us back to Nazi Germany by holding over any provisions of HR
4437.
While it would be a step backward, perhaps keeping in a provision criminalizing
undocumented immigrants and those who "assist" them would be a good thing. Actually,
it may be the best thing to keep in.
Imagine our jails filled with family members of undocumented immigrants, wasting
taxpayer money on housing and feeding these non-violent "criminals." Imagine business
owners, bankers, doctors, social workers and lawyers also being jailed and having
their property seized. Why, we would need to build, build, build more jails!
I would especially like to see Protestant pastors, Catholic priests, Muslim imams,
Jewish rabbis and other heads of congregations and faiths jailed for their
disobedience and the government seizing congregational and personal property.
Could this please happen during worship services, maybe all on one day per
denomination? It would best be carried out on a holy day. That way more people will
see their leaders being hauled off and the devastating effects of not paying
attention to history.
--
---
_____________________________________________________

I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers
along with all institutions of the industrialized slavery and genocide.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvies, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
___________________________________________________
--
Topaz
2006-03-25 18:33:27 UTC
Permalink
During World War Two the Germans put Jews and Communists in
concentration camps. The USA locked also up the Japanese and their
political opponents and for less reason. At the end of the war there
was a lot of deaths in the German camps from disease and starvation
because Germany was being bombed to rubble. There is no evidence that
the Germans had gas chambers or an extermination plan.
Newsweek magazine May 15, 1989 says on page 64:
"the way the Nazis did things: the secrecy, the unwritten orders, the
destruction of records and the innocent-sounding code names for the
extermination of the Jews. Perhaps it was inevitable that historians
would quarrel over just what happened"
The real reason there are no records of an extermination plan is
because there was no extermination plan. The Germans planned to deport
the Jews out of Germany. The records show that they planned to move
them to Madagascar.
Here is part of the Leuchter Report:
"Thirty-one samples were selectively removed from the alleged gas
chambers at Kremas I, II, III, IV and V. A control sample was taken
from delousing facility #1 at Birkenau. The control sample was removed
from a delousing chamber in a location where cyanide was known to have
been used and was apparently present as blue staining. Chemical
testing of the control sample #32 showed a cyanide content of 1050
mg/kg, a very heavy concentration. The conditions at areas from which
these samples were taken are identical with those of the control
sample, cold, dark, and wet. Only Kremas IV and V differed, in the
respect that these locations had sunlight (the buildings have been
torn down) and sunlight may hasten the destruction of uncomplexed
cyanide. The cyanide combines with the iron in the mortar and brick
and becomes ferric-ferro-cyanide or prussian blue pigmentation, a very
stable iron-cyanide complex.
"The locations from which the analyzed samples were removed are set
out in Table III.
"It is notable that almost all the samples were negative and that the
few that were positive were very close to the detection level
(1mg/kg); 6.7 mg/kg at Krema III; 7.9 mg/kg at Krerma I. The absence
of any consequential readings at any of the tested locations as
compared to the control sample reading 1050 mg/kg supports the
evidence that these facilities were not execution gas chambers. The
small quantities detected would indicate that at some point these
buildings were deloused with Zyklon B - as were all the buildings at
all these facilities"
Professional holocaust believers have admitted that the "gas chamber"
which is shown to the tourists at Auschwitz was actually built by the
allies after the war was over. This is what they wrote:
Brian Harmon <***@msg.ucsf.edu> wrote in article
<080620000051136373%***@msg.ucsf.edu>...
"You're confusing Krema I with Kremas II-V. Krema I is a
reconstruction, this has never been a secret. Kremas II-V are in
their demolished state as they were left."
Charles Don Hall <cdhall-***@erols.com> wrote in article
<***@news.erols.com>...
"Certainly not! The word "fake" implies a deliberate attempt to
deceive.
"The staff of the Auschwitz museum will readily explain that the Nazis
tried to destroy the gas chambers in a futile attempt to conceal their
crimes. And they'll tell you that reconstruction was done later on. So
it would be dishonest for me to call it a "fake". I'll cheerfully
admit that it's a "reconstruction" if that makes you happy."
They admit that the "gas chamber" shown to the tourists at Auschwitz
was built by the allies after the war was over. There is no physical
evidence that the Germans had gas chambers. No bodies of people who
died from gas have been found. The Communists were the first to enter
the camps. How do the other allies know the Communists didn't blow up
the buildings? Then they could claim that these demolished buildings
used to be gas chambers.
But then the believers will say the Germans confessed. Their main
confession is from Hoess. Here are the details:
"In the introduction to Death Dealer [Buffalo: Prometheus, 1992], the
historian Steven Paskuly wrote: "Just after his capture in 1946, the
British Security Police were able to extract a statement from Hoess by
beating him and filling him with liquor." Paskuly was reiterating what
Rupert Butler and Bernard Clarke had already described.
In 1983, Rupert Butler published an unabashed memoir (Legions of
Death, Hamlyn: London) describing in graphic detail how, over three
days, he and Clarke and other British policemen managed to torture
Hoess into making a "coherent statement." According to Butler [Legions
of Death, p. 237], he and the other interrogators put the boots to
Hoess the moment he was captured. For starters, Clarke struck his face
four times to get Höess to reveal his true identity.
<quote>
The admission suddenly unleashed the loathing of Jewish sergeants in
the arresting party whose parents had died in Auschwitz following an
order signed by Höss.
The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pajamas ripped from his
body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where
it seemed to Clarke the blows and screams were endless.
Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: "Call them off,
unless you want to take back a corpse."
A blanket was thrown over Höss and he was dragged to Clarke's car,
where the sergeant poured a substantial slug of whisky down his
throat. Höss tried to sleep.
Clarke thrust his service stick under the man's eyelids and ordered in
Geffnan: "Keep your pig eyes open, you swine."
For the first time Höss trotted out his oft-repeated justification: "I
took my orders from Himmler. I was a soldier in the same way as you
are a soldier and we had to obey orders."
The party arrived back at Heide around three in the morning. The snow
was swirling
still, but the blanket was torn from Höss and he was made to walk
completely nude
through the prison yard to his cell.
</quote>

An article in the British newspaper Wrexham Leader [Mike Mason, "In a
cell with a Nazi war criminal-We kept him awake until he confessed,"
October 17, 1986] following the airing of a TV documentary on the case
of Rudolf Hoess included eyewitness recollections by Ken Jones:
<quote>
Mr. Ken Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery
stationed at
Heid[e] in Schleswig-Holstein. "They brought him to us when he
refused to
cooperate over questioning about his activities during the war. He
came in the winter
of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks," recalls
Mr. Jones. Two
other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join Höss in his cell
to help break
him down for interrogation. "We sat in the cell with him, night and
day, armed with
axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to
help break down
his resistance," said Mr. Jones. When Höss was taken out for exercise
he was made
to wear only jeans and a cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three
days and
nights without sleep, Höss finally broke down and made a full
confession to
the authorities.
</quote>

The confession Hoess signed was numbered document NO-1210; later
revamped, as document PS-3868, which became the basis for an oral
deposition Hoess made for the IMT on April 15, 1946, a month after it
had been extracted from him by torture...
Since what people confess to after they have been captured by the
Communists and their liberal comrades is not proof of anything, this
leaves only the stories of survivors. These contradict each other and
not believable. One professional survivor said that he could tell if
the Germans were gassing German Jews or Polish Jews by the color of
the smoke.
The fact that there are so many "survivors" is not proof of an
extermination plan. There may be six million survivors. Just about
every Jew that is old says he is a survivor.
The real "holocaust" was when the Communist Jews murdered millions of
Christians. Communism was Jewish. Here is proof:
Article Winston Churchill wrote in 1920:
"This movement amongst the Jews (the Russian Revolution) is not new.
From the days of Spartacus Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down
to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kuhn (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany)
and Emma Goldman (United States), this world wide conspiracy for the
overthrow of civilization and the reconstruction of society on the
basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible
equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer,
Mrs. Nesta Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part
in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of
every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at
last this band of extraordinary personalities has gripped the Russian
people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the
undisputed masters of that enormous empire. There is no need to
exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the
actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international
and for the most part atheistic Jews. Moreover, the principal
inspiration and driving power comes from Jewish leaders." (ibid)
Lev Trotzky wrote a book called "Stalin: An Appraisal of the Man and
His Influence", Harper Bros., New York and London, 1941, translated by
Charles Malamuth.
In this book he told who the principle members of the October Central
Committee were. This group was the leadership of the Bolshevik Party
during the October Revolution. This is what he wrote:
"In view of the Party's semi-legality the names of persons elected by
secret ballot were not announced at the Congress, with the exception
of the four who had received the largest number of votes. Lenin--133
out of a possible 134, Zinoviev--132, Kamenev--131, Trotzky--131."
Of these four top leaders of the Bolshevik Party the last three were
known Jews. Lenin was thought to be a gentile married to a Jewess. It
was later proven that he was one quarter Jewish, London Jewish
Chronicle April 21, 1995, Lenin: Life and Legacy.
David Francis, the American Ambassador to Russia at the time of the
Revolution, wrote:
"The Bolshevic leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of
whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country
but are internationalists and they are trying to start a world-wide
revolution."
The Director of British Intelligence to the U.S. Secretary of State
wrote this:
"There is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international
movement controlled by Jews."
In 1945 the FBI arrested six individuals for stealing 1700 highly
confidential documents from State Department files. This was the
Amerasia case they were:
Philip Jaffe, a Russian Jew who came to the U.S. in 1905. He was at
one time the editor of the communist paper "Labor Defense" and the
ringleader of the group arrested.
Andrew Roth, a Jew.
Mark Gayn, a Jew, changed his name from Julius Ginsberg.
John Service, a gentile.
Emmanuel Larsen, nationality unknown
Kate Mitchel, nationality unknown.
In 1949 the Jewess Judith Coplin was caught passing classified
documents from Justice Department files to a Russian agent.
The highest ranking communist brought to trial in the U.S. was Gerhart
Eisler. He was a Jew. He was the secret boss of the Communist Party
in the U.S. and commuted regularly between the U.S. and Russia.
In 1950 there was the "Hollywood Ten" case. Ten leading film writers
of the Hollywood Film Colony were convicted for contempt of Congress
and sentenced to prison. Nine of the ten were Jews. Six of the ten
were communist party members and the other four were flagrantly
pro-communist.
One of the top new stories of 1949 was the trial of Eugene Dennis and
the Convicted Eleven. This group comprised the National Secretariat of
the American Communist Party. Six were Jews, two gentiles, three
nationality unknown.
Also in 1949 the German-born atomic scientist Klaus Fuchs was
convicted for passing atomic secrets to the Russians. Acting on
information obtained from Fuchs the FBI arrested nine other members of
the ring. All of them were convicted. Eight of the nine were Jews.
Here are some quotes from a very pro-Jewish book that was first
published in 1925. The book is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis
Browne.
"But save for such exceptions, the Jews who led or participated in the
heroic efforts to remold the world of the last century, were neither
Reform or Orthodox. Indeed, they were often not professing Jews at
all.
"For instance, there was Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne, both
unfaltering champions of freedom. And even more conspicuously, there
was Karl Marx, one of the great prophetic geniuses of modern times.
"Jewish historians rarely mention the name of this man, Karl Marx,
though in his life and spirit he was far truer to the mission of
Israel than most of those who were forever talking of it. He was born
in Germany in 1818, and belonged to an old rabbinic family. He was not
himself reared as a Jew, however, but while still a child was baptized
a Christian by his father. Yet the rebel soul of the Jew flamed in him
throughout his days, for he was always a 'troubler' in Europe."
"Then, of course, there are Ludwig Borne and Heinrich Heine, two men
who by their merciless wit and sarcasm became leaders among the
revolutionary writers. Karl Marx, Ferdinand Lassalle, Johann Jacoby,
Gabriel Riesser, Adolphe Cremieux, Signora Nathan- all these of Jewish
lineage played important roles in the struggle that went throughout
Europe in this period. Wherever the war for human liberty was being
waged, whether in France, Germany, Austria, Hungary, or Italy, there
the Jew was to be found. It was little wonder that the enemies of
social progress, the monarchists and the Churchmen, came to speak of
the whole liberal movement as nothing but a Jewish plot."
The book "Soviet Russia and the Jews" by Gregor Aronson and published
by the American Jewish League Against Communism, quotes Stalin in an
interview in 1931 with the Jewish Telegraph Agency. Stalin said:
"...Communists cannot be anything but outspoken enemies of
Anti-Semitism. We fight anti-Semites by the strongest methods in the
Soviet Union. Active anti-Semites are punished by death under the
law."
The following quotes are taken directly from documents available from
the
U.S. Archives:
State Department document 861.00/1757 sent May 2, 1918 by U.S. consul
general in Moscow, Summers: "Jews prominent in local Soviet
government, anti-Jewish feeling growing among population...."
State Department document 861.00/2205 was sent from Vladivostok on
July 5, 1918 by U.S. consul Caldwell: "Fifty percent of Soviet
government in each town consists of Jews of the worst type."
From the Headquarters of the American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia on
March 1, 1919, comes this telegram from Omsk by Chief of Staff, Capt.
Montgomery Shuyler: "It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the
United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since it's
beginning, guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest
type" type."
A second Schuyler telegram, dated June 9, 1919 from Vladivostok,
reports on the make-up of the presiding Soviet government: "...(T)here
were 384 'commissars' including 2 negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen,
22 Armenians, AND MORE THAN 300 JEWS. Of the latter number, 264 had
come to Russia from the United States since the downfall of the
Imperial Government.
The Netherlands' ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, confirmed this:
"Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to
spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is
organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one
object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things."
"The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in
Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction
and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental an
physical forces, become a reality all over the world." (The American
Hebrew, September 10, 1920 "In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the
membership of the Soviet communist party was Jewish, though Jews
comprised only 1.8 percent of the total population." (Stuart Kahan,
The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)
Interestingly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make
so-called "anti-Semitism" a capital crime. This is confirmed by Stalin
himself:
"National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic
customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as
an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of
cannibalism...under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the
death penalty." (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).
Here is a quote from Mein Kampf:
"Making an effort to overcome my natural reluctance, I tried to read
articles of this nature published in the Marxist Press; but in doing
so my aversion increased all the more. And then I set about learning
something of the people who wrote and published this mischievous
stuff. From the publisher downwards, all of them were Jews. I
recalled to mind the names of the public leaders of Marxism, and then
I realized that most of them belonged to the Chosen Race- the Social
Democratic representatives in the Imperial Cabinet as well as the
secretaries if the Trades Unions and the street agitators. Everywhere
the same sinister picture presented itself. I shall never forget the
row of names- Austerlitz, David, Adler, Ellonbogen, and others. One
fact became quite evident to me. It was that this alien race held in
its hands the leadership of that Social Democratic Party with whose
minor representatives I had been disputing for months past."
Solzhenitsyn named in his book the six top administrators of the
Soviet death camps. All six of them were Jews.
Here is something the National Socialists wrote:
"The Soviet Union was in fact a paradise for one group: the Jews. Even
at times when for foreign policy reasons Jews were less evident in the
government, or when they ruled through straw men, the Jews were always
visible in the middle and lower levels of the administration."



http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
Alric Knebel
2006-03-26 17:07:00 UTC
Permalink
[copy-paste article deleted]
Look: YOU are INFERIOR to most of humankind, be they white, black, red,
straight, gay -- whatever. You exploit this supremacist ideology
because it allows you to hide your individual shortcomings within the
perceived accomplishments of the white race. You're a white supremacist
because your WHITENESS turns out to be the only real asset you have to
promote, and any esteem you have hinges solely on your forsaking your
individuality. By promoting it (your whiteness) -- with its alleged
higher IQ averages and subsequent inventiveness -- you subsume your
identity into the history of the white race, coattailing on the
achievements of others by conscripting them into your white collective.
In reality, you exist on the fringes of humanity, regardless of your
race, on the most primitive margins, and unfit for the future of
humanity. Those are the facts, my little goose-stepper. If you don't
take steps to reclaim your individuality, you're going to die a
gibbering nitwit, as ignorant as the day you were born.
--
Alric Knebel
http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com
R***@hotmail.com
2006-04-01 03:10:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alric Knebel
[copy-paste article deleted]
Look: YOU are INFERIOR to most of humankind, be they white, black, red,
straight, gay -- whatever. You exploit this supremacist ideology
because it allows you to hide your individual shortcomings within the
perceived accomplishments of the white race. You're a white supremacist
because your WHITENESS turns out to be the only real asset you have to
promote, and any esteem you have hinges solely on your forsaking your
individuality. By promoting it (your whiteness) -- with its alleged
higher IQ averages and subsequent inventiveness -- you subsume your
identity into the history of the white race, coattailing on the
achievements of others by conscripting them into your white collective.
In reality, you exist on the fringes of humanity, regardless of your
race, on the most primitive margins, and unfit for the future of
humanity. Those are the facts, my little goose-stepper. If you don't
take steps to reclaim your individuality, you're going to die a
gibbering nitwit, as ignorant as the day you were born.
--
Alric Knebel
http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com
Huge crock of SHIT.

I knew several people who were actually there to see it, and I'm also
related to some.

Everybody knows what the Nazis did. It is such an idiotic statement of
pure hate. And it's hard to beleive that there is so much hatred in
this world.

Disgusting. The man is sick. Possesed by Satan.
Topaz
2006-04-01 17:09:45 UTC
Permalink
by Theodore J. O'Keefe

Nothing has been more effective in establishing the authenticity of
the Holocaust story in the minds of Americans than the terrible scenes
US troops discovered when they entered German concentration camps at
the close of World War II.

At Dachau, Buchenwald, Dora, Mauthausen, and other work and detention
camps, horrified US infantrymen encountered heaps of dead and dying
inmates, emaciated and diseased. Survivors told them hair-raising
stories of torture and slaughter, and backed up their claims by
showing the GIs crematory ovens, alleged execution gas chambers,
supposed implements of torture, and even shrunken heads and
lampshades, gloves, and handbags purportedly made from skin flayed
from dead inmates.

US government authorities, mindful that many Americans who remembered
the atrocity stories fed them during World War I still doubted the
Allied propaganda directed against the Hitler regime, resolved to
"document" what the GIs had found in the camps. Prominent newsmen
and politicians were flown in to see the harrowing evidence, while
the US Army Signal Corps filmed and photographed the scenes for
posterity. Famous journalist Edward R. Murrow reported, in tones of
horror, but no longer of disbelief, what he had been told and shown,
and Dachau and
Buchenwald were branded on the hearts and minds of the American
populace as names of infamy unmatched in the sad and bloody history
of this planet.

For Americans, what was "discovered" at the camps -- the dead and the
diseased, the terrible stories of the inmates, all the props of
torture and terror -- became the basis not simply of a transitory
propaganda campaign but of the conviction that, yes, it was true: the
Germans did exterminate six million Jews, most of them in lethal gas
chambers.

What the GIs found was used, by way of films that were mandatory
viewing for the vanquished populace of Germany, to "re-educate" the
German people by destroying their national pride and their will to a
united, independent national state, imposing in their place
overwhelming feelings of collective guilt and political impotence.
And when the testimony, and the verdict, of the Nuremberg Tribunal
incorporated most, if not all, of the horror stories Americans were
told about
Dachau, Buchenwald, and other places captured by the US Army, the
Holocaust could pass for one of the most documented, one of the most
authenticated, one of the most proven historical episodes in the
human record.

A Different Reality

But it is known today that, very soon after the liberation of the
camps, American authorities were aware that the real story of the
camps was quite different from the one in which they were coaching
military public information officers, government spokesmen,
politicians, journalists, and other mouthpieces.

When American and British forces overran western and central Germany
in the spring of 1945, they were followed by troops charged with
discovering and securing any evidence of German war crimes.

Among them was Dr. Charles Larson, one of America's leading forensic
pathologists, who was assigned to the US Army's Judge Advocate
General's Department. As part of a US War Crimes Investigation Team,
Dr. Larson performed autopsies at Dachau and some twenty other German
camps, examining on some days more than 100 corpses. After his grim
work at Dachau, he was
questioned for three days by US Army prosecutors.

Dr. Larson's findings? In an 1980 newspaper interview he said: "What
we've heard is that six million Jews were exterminated. Part of that
is a hoax." And what part was the hoax? Dr. Larson, who told his
biographer that to his knowledge he "was the only forensic pathologist
on duty in the entire European Theater" of Allied military operations,
confirmed that "never was a case of poison gas uncovered."

Typhus, Not Poison Gas

If not by gassing, how did the unfortunate victims at Dachau,
Buchenwald and Bergen-Belsen perish? Were they tortured to death or
deliberately starved? The answers to these questions are known as
well.

As Dr. Larson and other Allied medical men discovered, the chief
cause of death at Dachau, Belsen and the other camps was disease,
above all typhus, an old and terrible scourge of mankind that until
recently flourished in places where populations were crowded together
in circumstances where public health measures were unknown or had
broken down. Such was the case in the overcrowded internment camps in
Germany at war's end, where, despite such measures as systematic
delousing, quarantine of the sick and cremation of the dead, the
virtual
collapse of Germany's food, transport, and public health systems led
to catastrophe.

Perhaps the most authoritative statement of the facts as to typhus and
mortality in the camps has been made by Dr. John E. Gordon, M.D.,
Ph.D., a professor of preventive medicine and epidemiology at the
Harvard University School of Public Health, who was with US forces in
Germany in 1945. Dr. Gordon reported in 1948 that "The outbreaks in
concentration camps and prisons made up the great bulk of typhus
infection encountered in Germany." Dr. Gordon summarized the causes
for the outbreaks as follows:

Germany in the spring months of April and May [1945] was an
astounding sight, a mixture of humanity travelling this way and that,
homeless, often hungry and carrying typhus with them ...Germany was in
chaos. The destruction of whole cities and the path left by advancing
armies produced a disruption of living conditions contributing to the
spread of the disease. Sanitation was low grade, public utilities were
seriously disrupted, food supply and food distribution was poor,
housing was inadequate and order and discipline were everywhere
lacking. Still more important, a shifting of populations was occurring
such as few countries and few times have experienced.

Dr. Gordon's findings are corroborated by Dr. Russell Barton, today a
psychiatrist of international repute, who entered Bergen-Belsen with
British forces as a young medical student in 1945. Barton, who
volunteered to care for the diseased survivors, testified under sworn
oath in a Toronto courtroom in 1985 that "Thousands of prisoners who
died at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp during World War II
weren't deliberately starved to death but died from a rash of
diseases."

Dr. Barton further testified that on entering the camp he had credited
stories of deliberate starvation but decided such stories were untrue
after inspecting the well equipped kitchens and the meticulously
maintained ledgers, dating back to 1942, of food cooked and dispensed
each day.

Despite noisily publicized claims and widespread popular notions to
the contrary, no researcher has been able to document a German policy
of extermination through starvation in the German camps.

No 'Human Skin' Lampshades

What of the ghoulish stories of concentration camp inmates skinned for
their tattoos, flayed to make lampshades and handbags, or other
artifacts? What of the innumerable "torture racks," "meathooks,"
whipping posts, gallows, and other tools of torment and death that are
reported to have abounded at every German camp? These allegations, and
even more grotesque ones proffered by Soviet prosecutors, found their
way into the record at Nuremberg.

The lampshade and tattooed-skin charges were made against Ilse Koch,
dubbed by journalists the "Bitch of Buchenwald," who was reported to
have furnished her house with objects manufactured from the tanned
hides of luckless inmates.

But General Lucius Clay, military governor of the US zone of occupied
Germany, who reviewed her case in 1948, told his superiors in
Washington: "There is no convincing evidence that she [Ilse Koch]
selected inmates for extermination in order to secure tattooed skins
or that she possessed any articles made of human skin." In an
interview General Clay gave years later, he stated about the material
for the infamous lampshades: "Well, it turned out actually that it was
goat flesh. But
at the trial it was still human flesh. It was almost impossible for
her to have gotten a fair trial." Ilse Koch hanged herself in a German
jail in 1967.

It would be tedious to itemize and refute the thousands of bizarre
claims as to Nazi atrocities. That there were instances of German
cruelty, however, is clear from the testimony of Dr. Konrad Morgen, a
legal investigator attached to the Reich Criminal Police, whose
statements on the witness stand at Nuremberg have never been
challenged by proponents of the Jewish Holocaust story. Dr. Morgen
informed the court that he had been given full authority by Heinrich
Himmler,
commander of Hitler's SS and the dread Gestapo, to enter any German
concentration camp and investigate instances of cruelty and corruption
on the part of camp personnel. As he explained in sworn testimony at
Nuremberg, Dr. Morgen investigated 800 such cases, resulting in more
than 200 convictions. Punishments included the death penalty for the
worst offenders, including Hermann Florstedt, commandant of Lublin
(Majdanek), and Karl Koch (Ilse's husband), commandant of Buchenwald.

While German camp commandants in certain cases did inflict physical
punishment, such acts had to be approved by authorities in Berlin, and
it was required that a camp physician first certify the good health of
the prisoner to be disciplined, and then be on hand at the actual
beating. After all, throughout most of the war the camps were
important centers of industrial activity. The good health and morale
of the prisoners was critical to the German war effort, as is
evidenced in a January 1943 order issued by SS General Richard Glücks,
chief of the office that supervised the
concentration camps. It held the camp commanders "personally
responsible for exhausting every possibility to preserve the physical
strength of the detainees." Camp Survivors: Merely Victims?
US Army investigators, working at Buchenwald and other camps, quickly
ascertained what was common knowledge among veteran inmates: that the
worst offenders, the cruelest denizens of the camps, were not the
guards but the prisoners themselves. Common criminals of the same
stripe as those who populate US prisons today committed many
villainies, particularly when they held positions of authority, and
fanatical Communists, highly organized to combat their many
political enemies among the inmates, eliminated their foes with
Stalinist ruthlessness. Two US Army investigators at Buchenwald, Egon
W. Fleck and Edward A. Tenenbaum, carefully investigated circumstances
in the camp before its liberation. In a detailed report submitted to
their superiors, they revealed, in the words of Alfred Toombs, their
commander, who wrote a preface to the report, "how the prisoners
themselves organized a deadly terror within the Nazi terror."

Fleck and Tenenbaum described the power exercised by criminals and
Communists as follows:

The trusties, who in time became almost exclusively Communist
Germans, had the power of life and death over all other inmates. They
could sentence a man or a group to almost certain death ... The
Communist trusties were directly responsible for a large part of the
brutalities at Buchenwald.

Colonel Donald B. Robinson, chief historian of the American military
government in Germany, summarized the Fleck-Tenenbaum report in an
article published in an American magazine shortly after the war.
Colonel Robinson wrote succinctly of the American investigators'
findings: "It appeared that the prisoners who agreed with the
Communists ate; those who didn't starved to death."

Additional corroboration of inmate brutality has been provided by
Ellis E. Spackman, who, as Chief of Counter-Intelligence Arrests and
Detentions for the US Seventh Army, was involved in the liberation of
Dachau. Spackman, later a professor of history at San Bernardino
Valley College in California, wrote in 1966 that at Dachau "the
prisoners were the actual instruments that inflicted the barbarities
on their fellow prisoners."

'Gas Chambers'

In December 1944 US Army officers Colonel Paul Kirk and Lt. Colonel
Edward J. Gully inspected the German concentration camp at
Struthof-Natzweiler in Alsace. They submitted their findings to their
superiors at the headquarters of the US 6th Army Group, which
subsequently forwarded their report to the US War Crimes Division.
While, significantly, the full text of their report has never been
published, it has been revealed, by a historian supportive of
Holocaust claims, that the two investigators were careful to
characterize equipment exhibited to them by French informants as a
"so-called lethal gas chamber," and to claim it was "allegedly used as
a lethal gas chamber." (Emphasis added)

Both the careful phraseology of the Natzweiler report, and its
effective suppression, stand in stark contrast to the credulity, the
confusion, and the blaring publicity that accompanied official reports
of alleged gas chambers at Dachau. At first, a US Army photo depicting
a GI gazing at a steel door marked with a skull and crossbones and the
German words for: "Caution! Gas! Mortal danger! Don't open!," was
identified as showing the murder weapon.

Later, however, it was evidently decided that the apparatus in
question was merely a standard delousing chamber for clothing, and
another alleged gas chamber, this one cunningly disguised as a shower
room, was exhibited to American congressmen and journalists as the
site where thousands breathed their last. While there exist numerous
reports in the press as to the operation of this second "gas chamber,"
no official report by trained Army investigators has yet surfaced to
reconcile such problems as the function of the shower heads: Were they
"dummies," or did lethal cyanide gas stream through them? (Each theory
has appreciable support in journalistic and
historiographical literature.)

As with Dachau, so with Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, and the other camps
liberated by the Allies in western Germany. There was no end of
propaganda about "gas chambers," "gas ovens," and the like, but so far
not a single detailed description of the murder weapon and its
function, not a single report of the kind that is mandatory for the
successful prosecution of any assault or murder case in America at
that time and today, has come to light.

Furthermore, a number of Holocaust authorities have now publicly
decreed that there were no gassings, no extermination camps in Germany
after all. (We are now told that "gassing" and "extermination" camps
were located exclusively in what is now Poland, in areas captured by
the Soviet Red Army and made off-limits to western investigators.)

Dr. Martin Broszat of the Munich-based Institute for Contemporary
History, which is funded by the German government, stated
categorically in a 1960 letter to the German weekly Die Zeit: "Neither
in Dachau nor in Bergen-Belsen nor in Buchenwald were Jews or other
prisoners gassed." Professional "Nazi hunter" Simon Wiesenthal stated
in 1975 and again in 1993 that "there were no
extermination camps on German soil."

Dachau "gas chamber" No. 2, which was once presented to a stunned and
grieving world as a weapon that claimed hundreds of thousands of
lives, is now described in the brochure issued to tourists at the
modern Dachau "memorial site" in these words: "This gas chamber,
camouflaged as a shower room, was not used."

The Propaganda Intensifies

More than 50 years after American troops entered Dachau, Buchenwald
and other German camps, and trained American investigators established
the facts as to what had gone on in them, the government in
Washington, the entertainment media in Hollywood, and the print media
in New York continue to churn out millions of words and images
annually on the horrors of the camps and the infamy of the Holocaust.
Despite the fact that, with the exception of the defeated Confederacy,
no enemy of America has ever so suffered so complete and devastating
defeat as did Germany in 1945, the mass media and the politicians and
bureaucrats behave as if Hitler, his troops, and his concentration
camps continue to exist in an eternal present, and our opinion makers
continue to distort, through ignorance or malice, the facts about the
camps.

Time for the Truth

It is time that the government and the professional historians reveal
the facts about Dachau, Buchenwald and the other camps. It is time
they let the American public know how the inmates died, and how they
didn't die. It is time that the claims of mass murder by gassing are
clarified and investigated in the same manner as any other claims of
murder. It is time that the free ride certain groups have enjoyed as
the result of unchallenged Holocaust claims be terminated, just as it
is time to end the scapegoating of other groups, including Germans,
eastern Europeans, the
Roman Catholic hierarchy, and the wartime leadership of America and
Britain, either for their alleged role in the Holocaust or their
supposed failure to stop it.

Above all, it is time that the citizens of this great Republic have
the facts about the camps, facts they have a right to know, a right
that is fundamental to the exercise of their authority and their will
in the governance of their country. As citizens and as taxpayers,
Americans of all ethnic backgrounds, of all faiths, have a basic right
and an overriding interest in determining the facts of incidents that
are deemed by those in positions of power to be significant in
determining America's foreign and educational policy, as well as its
selection of past events to be memorialized in our
civic life.

Today the alleged facts of the Holocaust are at issue all over the
civilized world. The truth will be decided only by recourse to the
facts, in the public forum: not by concealing the facts, denying the
truth, stonewalling reality. The truth will out, and it is time the
government of this country, and governments and international bodies
throughout the world, make public the evidence of what actually
transpired in the German concentration camps in the years 1933-1945,
so that we may put paid to the lies, without fear or favor, and carry
out the work of reconciliation and renewal that is and must be the
granite foundation of mutual tolerance between peoples and of a peace
based on justice.

Summary
The conclusions of the early US Army investigations as to the truth
about the wartime German concentration camps have since been
corroborated by all subsequent investigators and can be summarized:

1.The harrowing scenes of dead and dying inmates were not the result
of a German policy of "extermination," but rather the result of
epidemics of typhus and other disease brought about largely by the
effects of Allied aerial attacks.
2.Stories of Nazi supercriminals and sadists who turned Jews and
others into handbags and lampshades for their private profit or
amusement were sick lies or diseased fantasies; indeed, the German
authorities punished corruption and cruelty on the part of camp
commanders and guards.
3.On the other hand, portrayals of the newly liberated inmates as
saints and martyrs of Hitlerism were quite often very far from the
truth; indeed, most of the brutalities inflicted on camp detainees
were the work of their fellow prisoners, in contravention of German
policy and German orders.
4.The alleged homicidal showers and gas chambers were used either for
bathing camp inmates or delousing their clothes; the claim that they
were used to murder Jews or other human beings is a contemptible
fabrication. Orthodox historians and professional "Nazi-hunters" have
quietly dropped claims that inmates were gassed at Dachau, Buchenwald
and other camps in Germany. They continue, however, to keep silent
regarding the lies about Dachau and Buchenwald, as well as to evade an
open discussion of the evidence for homicidal gassing at Auschwitz and
the
other camps captured by the Soviets.


Institute For Historical Review
Post Office Box 2739
Newport Beach, California 92659





http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
_ G O D _
2006-04-01 22:43:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
by Theodore J. O'Keefe
.......<snip>....redundant crap has been carefully removed
for brevity of discussion and for making a valid point more
visible on background of completely unnecessary bullshit......
Post by Topaz
historians and professional "Nazi-hunters" have
quietly dropped claims that inmates were gassed
at Dachau, Buchenwald and other camps in Germany.
They continue, however, to keep silent regarding
the lies about Dachau and Buchenwald, as well
as to evade an open discussion of the evidence....
Institute For Historical Review
Post Office Box 2739
Newport Beach, California 92659
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
Why won't this organisation stop going back to the times
of widely-practices oppression and brutality against all of
the people in Europe (as well as around the world), and go
back to reality of the 21-st century, when brutal violation of
Human Rights is still exist almost 60 years after universal
adoption of the standards of Human Rights, prescribed by
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to every person
around the world without discrimination of any sort or form?

Please come back to the discussion about perpetuation of
ongoing slavery and genocide of the incarceration industry.

http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
http://www.un.org/rights/50/decla.htm
http://www.hrweb.org/legal/udhr.html
--
---
_____________________________________________________

I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers
along with all institutions of the industrialized slavery and genocide.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvies, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
___________________________________________________
--
Topaz
2006-04-03 01:54:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ G O D _
.......<snip>....redundant crap has been carefully removed
for brevity of discussion and for making a valid point more
visible on background of completely unnecessary bullshit......
Why won't this organisation stop going back to the times
of widely-practices oppression and brutality against all of
the people in Europe (as well as around the world), and go
back to reality of the 21-st century, when brutal violation of
Human Rights is still exist almost 60 years after universal
adoption of the standards of Human Rights, prescribed by
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to every person
around the world without discrimination of any sort or form?
Please come back to the discussion about perpetuation of
ongoing slavery and genocide of the incarceration industry.
White Sex Slaves
American Dissident Voices Broadcast of October 26, 2002


Welcome to American Dissident Voices. I'm Kevin Alfred Strom.

Today I'm going to talk to you about slavery. About slavery of White
women and girls enslaved by Jews. About sexual slavery and all that
that implies. So this is not a program for children or the overly
sensitive. You have been warned.

Last week I told you about the horrible rape/torture/murders of Whites
by Blacks in Wichita, Kansas , the Wichita Massacre , which is being
given the silent treatment by the Jewish media. It was mentioned in
the Moonie-owned Washington Times, and given some inner page
paragraphs here and there, but it is not a national cause celebre like
the racial epithet uttered in private by a Texaco executive a few
years back. And no major media voice is calling for "hate crime"
charges to be filed in the Wichita Massacre case. A few months ago a
young White man faced felony "hate crime" charges for merely posting a
small sticker truthfully warning others about the higher HIV infection
rates of Blacks compared with Whites. But the brutal sex-torture
slayings of a whole houseful of young Whites by Blacks is not a story
anywhere near as important as someone using the n-word. It doesn't
call for "hate crime" charges, either, but the posting of a sticker
carrying CDC AIDS statistics does. I'd say we were living in an insane
world, and I'd be
close to being right. But it's more accurate to say that we are living
in a world in which the Whites have been driven insane by media lies,
media distortions, media omissions, and a false Jewish "morality" that
pervades them all.

The fact that the Jews manufacture "outrage" through media coverage is
well known. The fact that they do everything in their power to
minimize outrage when the issue is non-White offenses against White
should make you question their motivations. And once you understand
their motivations, you will, like me, start to question their right to
own and
control our media of information and entertainment. You will
understand that they are a separate people, with separate interests
and oftentimes opposing interests to ours, and it is extremely
dangerous to let this separate, foreign people have a near-monopoly on
the information transmitted to our people.

Today, I am going to tell you about another crime against White people
which has received very little attention in the mainstream press.
Although a few reporters have mentioned it, it is, like the Wichita
Massacre , not a subject of nightly or weekly reports; it has never
been the subject of a major film or documentary; and the sitcoms and
jiggle shows are never interrupted to report on it. It's not a major
issue as defined by the Michael Eisners and Sumner Redstones of this
world.

And this crime is committed directly against White people by Jews
themselves. It is the crime of slavery, specifically the sex slavery
of White women captured by Jewish gangs and forced to "serve" in
brothels in Israel and elsewhere. The few articles that do get written
about this sex slavery almost never refer to Jews as the perpetrators.
Instead, the
Politically Correct euphemisms 'Russian gangs' , 'Russian organized
crime' , and 'Russian mafia' are used. There are hardly any real
Russians involved in these White slavery rings or in so-called
'Russian' organized crime at all , as the journalists who write these
articles well know. The journalists also well know that if they
emphasized the
Jewish nature of these traffickers in White Women that they would
quickly find themselves without employment.

The enticement into sex slavery begins with poverty. Russia and her
former Communist satellites in Eastern Europe were bled dry
economically by the Jew-created Communist system for many decades.
When that system collapsed, opportunistic capitalists and former
Communists-suddenly-turned-reformers, many of them Jews, moved in for
the easy pickings and bought privatized industries, took advantage of
naïve Whites unaccustomed to predatory business practices, and looted
large sections of Eastern Europe yet again, leaving the people
impoverished, dirt poor, and precariously close to starving, despite
the fact the Eastern Europeans are among the most highly cultured and
educated White peoples on Earth. To anyone who uses the Internet, it's
notorious that Russians and Ukrainians and Moldovans want to escape
their poverty and leave for the West, young women by the thousands are
advertising themselves for marriage to Western men on dozens of
matchmaker sites. Many breadwinners in those countries earn less than
the equivalent of $30 a month.


So when the well-groomed woman in line at the snowbound railway
station or the two-line classified ad in the local paper promises
thirty or sixty times that for easy "housework" or "waitress" jobs
overseas, it's no wonder that these desperately poor women say "yes"
by the thousands. A large number end up in Israel, where the sex
slavery of White women is especially common, and seldom even noticed
by the authorities who give it their tacit approval, but the Jewish
gangs have worldwide networks and enslaved White women are sold to
Jewish-controlled brothels in
Europe, Turkey, and as far afield as Asia.

Let's listen to the stories of some of these women.

Lara Matveyava had no idea that the kindly stranger who offered her a
way out of poverty was a recruiter for a Jewish White Slave ring. In
her case, she was promised a job doing easy housework in Germany,
watering the plants and feeding family pets. When she arrived in
Hamburg, the gang followed their usual first step for soon-to-slaves
with passports, they took the passport from her "for safekeeping,"
thus making her
technically an illegal alien and outside the normal protection of the
law.

After three days she was told what her real job was: she was to work
as a prostitute at a Hamburg brothel. Even though she determined at
once to return home, she was imprisoned for six months at various
brothels masquerading as bars and nightclubs until she finally
escaped. Back home, she says that most of the other sex slaves she met
there were so afraid of their captors that they had given up trying to
escape. Even today, Lara does not use her real name for fear of
retaliation from the Jewish gangs who "own" her.

She says: "'I'm not scared of anything any more because the worst
thing that could possibly happen to me already has. Very few of the
women I met had willingly become prostitutes. Most were tricked. Most
alarming was the sense that there was no way out. Our passports had
been taken; we didn't know what punishment would face us if we went to
the police. We were illegal immigrants involved in an illegal activity
, we didn't
expect any sympathy. To begin with I refused to do the work, but later
I had to, there was no other way of feeding myself, and by that time
I had seen the beatings other women got when they refused to
co-operate."

The women are told that they have to "work off their debts" before
they can go free, impossibly high figures that are arbitrarily
increased by their captors as "fines" if they refuse to submit to any
sexual degradation demanded, including gang rape. When one Jewish
pimp decides he needs "fresh goods," the women are sold to others,
often
again and again in a single year, with the "debts" they owe the pimps
going up with each transaction. Human rights groups estimate that
500,000 White women have been captured and abused by these Jewish
gangs, and that number is from Russia alone!

[London Observer Sunday November 12, 2000]

Twenty-one-year-old Irina thought she was going to be a dancer when
she got off the boat from Ukraine to Haifa, Israel. Within a few days,
she was driven to a whorehouse where her new Jewish boss burned her
passport before her eyes. "I own you," he said. "You are my property,
and you will work until you earn your way out. Don't try to leave. You
have no papers and you don't speak Hebrew. You will be arrested and
deported. Then we will get you and bring you back." At first, she
refused to be a prostitute, but the beatings and repeated rapes by her
owners eventually broke her spirit.

Irina says "I don't think the man who ruined my life will ever be
fined." Until recently, White slavery wasn't even against the law in
Israel. And it was only under intense international pressure that
Israel finally passed laws restricting it last year, but prosecutions
are very rare and sentences light. The enslavement of White women is
essentially winked at by the authorities there, who, after all, are
steeped in a tradition that only Jews are truly human beings, and
these White sex slaves aren't Jews. And pimps prostituting White women
to all comers, as long as the owners claim the women were not actually
purchased by them, is still legal there.

Marco Buffo, the head of an anti-slavery group in Italy stated "It's
no secret that the highest prices now go for the white women. They are
the novelty item now."

Mikhail Lebed, chief of criminal investigations of the Ukrainian
Interior Ministry states "Gangsters make more from these women in a
week than we have in our law-enforcement budget for the whole year. To
be honest, unless we get some help we are not going to stop it." And
the Jewish media are helping to bring these criminals to justice, and
get the Russians and Ukrainians the help and publicity they need,
right?

Recently Yitzhak Tyler of the Haifa police spilled the beans on some
of the operations in that Israeli port city:

"These men pay $500 to $1,000 for a Ukrainian or Russian woman. Do you
understand what I am telling you? They will buy these women and make a
fortune out of them. Take a small place, with 10 girls. Each has 15 to
20 clients a day. Multiply that by say 200 shekels. So say 30,000
shekels a day comes in to each place. Each girl works 25 days a month.
Minimum. So we are talking about 750,000 shekels a month, or about
$215,000. A man often owns five of these places. That's a million
dollars. No taxes, no real overhead. It's a factory with slave labor.
And we've got them all over Israel."

A million dollars a month for an average Jew pimp in Israel. What do
the women get? Beatings, rapes, forced performance of sex on demand,
and a little food and cigarette money. Bars on the windows. Marching
naked in Jewish slave markets when they're sold again for maybe the
fourth time this year. Gang violence and retaliation on their families
if they escape. Punishment and deportation at best from a complicit
legal system.

The Jewish pimps are so confident of their invulnerability that one of
them, Jacob Golan, owner of three houses of prostitution including Tel
Aviv's "Tropicana," even spoke to the New York Times, stating
"'Israelis love Russian girls. They are blonde and good-looking and
different from us,' he said, chuckling as he drew his hand over his
black hair 'And
they are desperate. They are ready to do anything for money.' Always
filled with half-naked Russian women, the club is open around the
clock. There are 12 cubicles at the Tropicana where 20 women work in
shifts, eight during the daytime, 12 at night. Business is always
booming, and not just with foreign workers. Israeli soldiers, with
rifles on their
shoulders, frequent the place, as do business executives and tourists.
Mr. Golan was asked if most women who work at the club do so
voluntarily. He laughed heartily."

In a supreme piece of bitter irony, the reporter noted that Golan has
posted a "missing" poster for an Israeli woman near the front counter
of his sex club. His concern is so touching, isn't it?

[The New York Times Sunday, January 11, 1998]

The United Nations now admits that the selling of sex slaves is now
organized crime's fastest-growing business. And most of these slaves
are White women. The Sydney Morning Herald states that White women are
"the most lucrative commodity of all", surpassing even the
international drug trade in importance. After all, drugs can be sold
only once and then they are used up. White women can be used and then
brought to the
slave markets again and again for years until they are dead or no
longer attractive.

Mariana's story is typical. Lured by promises of easy work and good
money, she left Russia for Israel:


"The brothel routine was brutal and efficient. She worked seven days a
week, servicing up to 20 customers a day, both Jewish and Arab?

"A man stood guard near the door of her room, furnished sparely with a
bed, a dresser, a shower and a sink. She was isolated from the outside
world, except for a woman who stopped each day to sell food to her and
the other Russian girls. Telephone calls home to assure her parents
that "work" was fine were monitored.

"After about five months, Mariana was allowed to leave the one-story
grey building with a driver to meet clients at a Tel Aviv hotel. Three
days later, a group of men drugged her in a cabana behind the hotel.

"'Do what we say. Don't kick and don't scream. There's no point in
fighting,' she remembers them saying before they gang-raped her.
Desperate, she tried to escape the brothel but was caught."

The Russian government admits that 100,000 women were smuggled out of
the country by these Jewish gangs in one year alone, making the human
rights groups' estimate of 500,000 enslaved Russian women look very
conservative. And that, I emphasize, is only Russia.

Doros Michael of the Immigrant Support Action Group in Cyprus,
explains that White women are the most sought-after sex slaves:

"Russian women are thought to be more educated, more beautiful and
more white than Asian women." [The Sydney Morning Herald, March 8,
2001]

Amnesty International has issued reports harshly criticizing Israel's
toleration of the sex slave "industry." I wonder whether you have
heard about that on Fox News or CBS or CNN? Amnesty International
stated:

"The government of Israel failed to take appropriate steps to prevent,
investigate, try and punish those responsible for the violations of
human rights committed against traded women." They also cited the case
of 27-year-old Valentina, who said: "The conditions were horrible.
Most of the girls suffered from venereal diseases. There was nowhere
to run, there were bars on the windows and guards all the time, day
and night."

Valentina eventually was able to leap from a second-story window,
evade the Israeli police, and escape to tell her tale. But thousands
of other White women and girls are still there.

One young Russian woman, Larissa, says that she managed to escape from
her pimp only to be arrested by the Israeli police, who then sold her
to another pimp who admitted he was a former Israeli police officer.
These White slaves are without hope and without friends: the few Jews
who oppose this slave trade are outside the power structure in Israel
and White people in the West are grazing contentedly in the pasture of
consumerism, uninformed about White slavery because the Jewish-owned
media don't tell them about it.

At a recent human rights conference sponsored by the World Coalition
Against Trafficking in Women, it was estimated that there are more
than 200 sex slave brothels in Tel Aviv alone. It was also stated:

"When they arrive in Israel they go through an 'educational seminar'
that includes rape and sale by auction, after which their passports
are taken from them and they are imprisoned in sealed apartments. They
are forced to work in prostitution in order to repay the 'debt'
incurred in bringing them to Israel."

A few former sex slaves had the courage to speak out:

"I am Ilona. I was sold for $15,000, and a few months later I was sold
once more. They forced me to accept 150 clients a week. Lots of people
knew about me and the other girls. There were taxi drivers and people
from the grocery store who brought alcohol, and also the doctors who
gave us pills against pregnancy, take them all month long, so that we
wouldn't lose any work because of the blood. And the doctors checked
us after we were beaten and gave us painkillers. But the worst thing
happened with the policemen who knew about me. One time I managed to
run away and went to the police. They referred me to a policeman who
knew Russian, and I spoke with him and he listened very intently. An
hour after he listened so intently my boss, the pimp, arrived at the
station and took me home and there he gave me the worst beating, so
that all the girls would see what happens if you run away. After that,
I couldn't work for a few days."

"I am Yanna. At the airport I was picked up by Ilyosha. I had six or
seven clients a day on Ben-Yehuda, and I made him NIS 600-700 a day. I
got food, cigarettes and NIS 20 a day. After two weeks, he sold me to
Peter and Gershon, and I worked for a month at their massage parlor,
10 or 15 clients a day, NIS 150 for half an hour, and for me, NIS 20
a
day, food and cigarettes. After two months, Peter sent me to another
bar. Whenever I wasn't working I was locked in an apartment, and they
brought me whatever I needed. Peter said that I could go after I had
made $40,000 for him. I had between 7 and 10 clients a day at the bar,
and there I had to earn NIS 700. If I had a slow day, I had to work
harder the next day. They also beat me at the massage parlor, the
employees and the manager."

A charity group that tries to help Russian children and women, and
prevent them from being ensnared by these Jewish White slave rings,
Miramed, estimates that 90 per cent. of the women who leave Russia in
the clutches of these Jews are not aware that they are headed for
prostitution. And I add that none are aware that they will be enslaved
behind bars, forced to satisfy the lusts of their Jewish owners on
demand, and be sold as slaves again and again in Jewish slave markets.

The Jewish media have obsessed for decades about Black slavery in
North America, a slavery that was abolished by White people and which
hasn't existed for over 130 years. But how often have you heard of the
enslavement of Whites which is going on right now?

I want all of you who hear my voice today to swear in the holy
sanctuary of your soul that you will never forget what the Jews have
done and are doing to more than 500,000 of our women and girls. And I
want you to promise me that you will never forget the Jewish media
bosses who cry crocodile tears for months when a Black criminal meets
a policeman's nightstick but who turn a blind eye to the sex slavery
of enough White
women to fill Rockford, Illinois three times over. When I say never
forget I mean never trust them again.

Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you that that
freedom is not free.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of ADV-list.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

==> To subscribe send an e-mail message to:
adv-list-***@NatVan.com
The subject of the message should be: Subscribe
Post by _ G O D _
I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers
along with all institutions of the industrialized slavery and genocide.
"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvies, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships
Democracy is a cruel joke when the Jews control the media.

"Jewry rules from behind the mask of democracy. What one calls
democracy today is concealed Jewish domination. Jews determine what
happens in the democratic states"
Julius Streicher, Der Stürmer, #34/1939.

"A couple of weeks ago I quoted a few sentences from a book published
in 1928 titled Propaganda, by ... Edward Bernays. Today I'll read to
you an expanded set of excerpts from Bernays' book to give you a
little more of the gist of his message. I quote:

"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits
and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic
society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society
constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of
our country.

"We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes are formed, our
ideas suggested largely by men we have never heard of. This is a
logical result of the way in which our democratic society is
organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner
if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. . . .

"Whatever attitude one chooses to take toward this condition, it
remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in
the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our
ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of
persons . . . who understand the mental processes and social patterns
of the masses.
It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who
harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the
world. . .

"No serious sociologist believes any longer that the voice of the
people expresses any divine or especially wise and lofty idea. The
voice of the people expresses the mind of the people, and that mind is
made up for it by the group leaders in whom it believes and by those
persons who understand the manipulation of public opinion. . . .

"Whether in the problem of getting elected to office or in the problem
of interpreting and popularizing new issues, or in the problem of
making the day-to-day administration of public affairs a vital part of
the community life, the use of propaganda, carefully adjusted to the
mentality of the masses, is an essential adjunct of political life." -
end of quote -

I should mention that Bernays' book is not profound or especially
valuable in itself. It merely states a few self-evident facts about
the way in which a modern society works. For the person interested in
propaganda, far more useful books are available. The fact that Bernays
was a Jew is not even especially relevant here except to emphasize
that propaganda, the mass media, psychology, and the manipulation of
others always have been subjects of special interest to the Jews. It
is not for nothing that they are as thick in these fields today as
they were in the time of Bernays and Freud. The reason I chose
Bernays' book to quote is that it provides a more concise and clear
summary, in a few quotable paragraphs, of the role of propaganda in
modern life than most other
books on the subject.

If I were you I wouldn't even waste time trying to hunt down a copy of
Bernays' book. Although it is available in larger libraries, it's long
been out of print, and all it does is state the obvious: namely, that
the whole concept of democracy is meaningless in an age where a few
people have in their hands the mechanism for controlling the attitudes
and opinions of a majority of the electorate. And Bernays also takes
the disingenuous position that not only is this control a fact of
life, but it is a good thing; it is necessary to control and regiment
the thinking of the public in order to avoid chaos, and it can only
lead us to greater progress and prosperity. He simply glosses over the
question of
who should exercise this control and what their motives should be.

If you really want to study the subject of propaganda, a good place to
start is with the 1962 book, also titled Propaganda, by the Frenchman
Jacques Ellul. That book is still in print and is available from the
sponsor of this program, National Vanguard Books. Professor Ellul
deals with the subject in much greater depth and with much greater
honesty than Bernays does, but he agrees with Bernays on the most
obvious and
fundamental conclusions: on the irrelevance of the idea of democracy,
for example. I quote from Professor Ellul's book:

"If I am in favor of democracy, I can only regret that propaganda
renders the true exercise of it almost impossible. But I think that it
would be even worse to entertain any illusions about a coexistence of
true democracy and propaganda." -- end of quote --

To me it is frustrating that a conclusion that seems so obvious is
nevertheless resisted by so many otherwise intelligent people.
Democracy has become almost a sacred concept to them, this idea that
the policies guiding our nation should be decided by counting the
votes of every featherless biped who has reached the age of 18. It's
like motherhood:
they're almost afraid to question it.

This seems to be as true of intellectuals in our society as it is of
Joe Sixpacks. The fact is that intellectuals are no more likely to be
independent-minded than people who work with their hands; most
intellectuals, just like most Joe Sixpacks, are lemmings. In fact, as
Ellul points out, it is precisely the intellectuals who are most
strongly controlled by propaganda, because they are more open to every
medium of propaganda.

And I must admit that it took me a long time to overcome the ideas
drummed into me when I was in school that under a democracy people are
more free than under any other political system, that under a
democracy we are all free to think and say whatever we want, and that
we have a greater responsibility as citizens of a democracy to make up
our own minds about things independently, and so on. Actually, we
still have some degree of individual freedom in the United States
today because more than 200 years ago men whose temperament was far
more aristocratic than democratic in the modern sense of the word were
willing to go to war against their legitimate government in order to
secure that freedom for us, and people with a truly democratic
temperament, who have been
gnawing away at that freedom ever since, haven't yet succeeded in
suppressing it completely.

Well, it should not be surprising to us that although books such as
Professor Ellul's Propaganda - and many others - are readily
available, almost no one has heard of them. Keeping the public
believing in the myth of democracy is an important element in
maintaining control over the thinking and behavior of the public. It
is simply immoral and
scandalous to question the reality of democracy. It's like questioning
the truth of the "Holocaust" story. And for that reason we're not
likely to be taught in our social studies classes in school or to read
in the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal even the most obvious
and self-evident conclusions presented by Bernays or Ellul. We're
still
taught how democracy safeguards our freedom, even while those who
control the mechanism of propaganda in our democratic society are
working day and night to eliminate that freedom."

The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books. It is
distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of ADV-list.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

==> To subscribe send an e-mail message to:
adv-list-***@NatVan.com
The subject of the message should be: Subscribe

To contact us via "snail mail," write to:
National Vanguard Books
Attention: ADVlist
P.O. Box 330
Hillsboro, WV 24946

The National Alliance: http://www.natvan.com
http://www.natall.com
Post by _ G O D _
and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
By Walter Ruthard

I myself was brought up in a small village in the southwest of
Germany. In 1939, when the war broke out, we left for the less exposed
Odenwald area until the possible danger of a French invasion had
passed. Shortly after that my father was transferred to the Ruhr
region. He as requested work as a foreman for the Mauser arms factory.
The government, true to their claims to be national and socialist,
took their promises seriously and provided young people starting a
family, as well as those who already had children, with affordable
housing. The first child brought a reduction of the mortgage by 25
percent, and when the fourth child arrived the mortgage was no more.
My parents already had four children then and thus were eligible for a
free newly built house from the government.

This was but one of the many programs the government established in
order to improve the quality of life for its citizens…

Then there was the "Kinderlandverschickung" program. It was started
before the war and enabled mothers in need of recreation to spend some
time in rural settings together with their children…

Another very popular social program of the government was "Fraft
durch Freude" (strength through joy). Here deserving workers could
take all-inclusive tours on luxury liners that were built especially
for this purpose. On these ships there was only one class and
everybody was treated the same. They visited the Azores and
Spitsbergen among other places. Those ships were not allowed to dock
in and English port however. The reason was that the British
government did not want it's citizens to see what it also could have
done for them…

The most misinterpreted program in Germany was the so-called
"Lebensborn". It was the exact opposite of what people are made to
believe it was, or should I say, of what people like to believe… The
Lebensborn was the institution to help unwed mothers who did not know
where to turn for help. They were taken care of during their
pregnancies and afterward as well. This was the Lebensborn, and any
other interpretation is plain hogwash…

My father was able to buy not one but three guns plus two pistols,
together with plenty of ammunition. All it took him was proof that he
was indeed a German citizen without a criminal record. Then in 1945,
when the French "liberated" us, they disarmed him. I know that he was
not the only one to have guns at home, because I saw the many, many
arms that were handed over to the French, and this was in a very small
village…

Then, after the war was over, we had our first experience with a real
democracy. The French introduced it and gave us some shining examples;
one was that the lived off the country and stole everything which
wasn't nailed down…

It was not until many years later that I learned that Hitler held at
least five plebiscites during the first half of his rule. In
democratic Germany, from 1945 until today there has never been a
plebiscite.

There were foreign workers employed in Germany during WWII. I knew
one of them. He worked on a farm and was treated exactly like the son
who was in the army. After the war he stayed on and married the
daughter of the house. He was a prisoner of war from Poland and I
never saw him guarded by any policeman. This is how foreigners were
treated in Germany. They earned the same wages as the Germans, they
took part in the social insurance program, had paid-for holidays
including free train fares, and many came back with friends who also
wanted to work for these "horrible" Germans. Today they are called
slave laborer.

Not everyone was entitled to go on to a university. Only good marks
and above-average performance in schools qualified. But good
performers were promoted with all means available. Today we are much
more democratic; everyone is entitled to a university education and if
the parents are wealthy enough, the son or daughter can study until
they are 35…

Germany was also the country to introduce, in 1933, the first-ever
comprehensive animal protection law. Farm animals had to be kept in
strictly natural environments and no animal factories were allowed. Of
course, no testing of products on animals was permitted, and no kosher
slaughter.

If new industrial facilities were built they had to conform to the
highest standards with adequate lighting and air inside, canteens
where the workers were served nutritious meals at affordable prices,
and beautiful lawns outside: all for the benefit of the workers…In
national socialist Germany, no child labor was allowed as it still was
in other European countries.


And finally, although I could still go on for a while, I would like to
mention that on express orders from Hitler himself, it was strictly
forbidden to use corporal punishment in the army. He was of the
opinion that in was incompatible with the honor of a German to be
punished by such degrading means.

That was the Germany I grew up in, and I am glad that I did.


http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
Chris Morton
2006-04-03 13:43:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
White Sex Slaves
So, what prompted you to write about your prison experiences?
--
--
Gun control, the theory that 110lb. women should have to fistfight with 210lb.
rapists.
_ G O D _
2006-04-04 17:29:17 UTC
Permalink
Topaz says...
Post by Topaz
White Sex Slaves
So, what prompted you to write about your prison experiences?
Slavery and genocide is still being successfully practiced
in all countries around the world even after adoption of the
Universal Charter of Human Rights, which was prompted
to be brought to this world as result of the unquestionable
and obvious unfairness that was experienced in by many
people all over the world. Not only in Germany, which we
are stressing most of all, in the capacity of the justification
of "defeat of Germany." And just like defeat of Germany, -
an Iraqi defeat by US was a mere excuse for deployment
of the military force in mass extermination of peaceful and
innocent people for the sake of testing the new weaponry...

Because US is practicing slavery and genocide now more
than it was before the adoption of the Universal Charter of
Human Rights, which clearly abolished all forms of slavery
and genocide. Its prisons - is an evidence of this practice.

Prisons were invented and designed specifically for brute
oppression of people. Because they are main instruments
of slavery and genocide in favor of unfair capitalization on
slave labor of hostages of the incarceration industry, if not
to practice perverse habits of sadistic guards and tyrants.

Perverse sadistic satisfaction from seeing agony in eyes
of helpless and defenceless hostages of the incarceration
industry, in addition to US' gulag economy, is still being a
strong driving force for sadistic COck-sucking americunts
(and other profiteers from exploitation of slave workforce)
to do everything in their power to perpetuate its existence...

Hence, it does not matter, whether this person has been to
prison, to "write about one's prison experiences, but it's a
an extremely valid cause and a noble obligation of every
person to reveal and to do on whatever in one's power to
stop every violation of Human Rights.

A person doesn't have to commit a crime, in order for him
to get in position of victim of the incarceration industry, or
to find oneself at the disadvantage to the predatory tactics
of completely corrupt Judicial System, in order to become
hostage of gulag economy. And one does not have to be
in prison, in order to be a defender of the Human Rights...

I have many friends, relatives and loved ones, who indeed,
have suffered injustice of incarceration solely on the basis
of their timidity. Their trust was betrayed by corrupt Judicial
System, whose first prerogative became perpetuation of
the incarceration industry over the Human Rights to justice
and dignity of people who undeservingly suffered violation
of their sacred rights, which should've been left preserved
and upheld even if they indeed, have committed a crime...

Inadvertently, inalienable rights of people must be always
honored, and their guilt should never be exploited, lest an
artificial suffering of miseries and hardship inflicted upon
them, regardless of the outlook individuals on both side of
the "punishment." Because everyone knows that there are
sadistic people out there, as well as masochists with their
perverse sense of satisfaction and twisted reconciliation....

Fairness is impossible to achieve by means of the totally
corrupt Judicial System, which does not equally address
all of the crimes of every particular individual, and without
consent to become victims of arbitrary infliction of misery
and hardship in violation of the human rights. Not all of the
committed their crimes have been caught and tried by fair
courts, let alone most of ongoing crimes is still committed
with complete impunity and under the cover of authorities.

Therefore, a state should not justify cruelty toward people
by methods of false pursuit of the fairness and subjecting
people to artificial hardship and misery of medieval forms
of slavery and genocide via incarceration and other brutal
violations of Human Rights. Because it must play a role of
upholder of law and the sacred rights of its residents-alike.
--
---
_____________________________________________________

I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers
along with all institutions of the industrialized slavery and genocide.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvies, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
___________________________________________________
--
Topaz
2006-04-06 01:19:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ G O D _
Slavery and genocide is still being successfully practiced
in all countries around the world even after adoption of the
Universal Charter of Human Rights, which was prompted
to be brought to this world as result of the unquestionable
and obvious unfairness that was experienced in by many
people all over the world. Not only in Germany, which we
are stressing most of all, in the capacity of the justification
of "defeat of Germany."
http://www.noontidepress.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=35&products_id=357
Filmed on location at the Auschwitz camp site in Poland, this stunning
video by Jewish-American investigator David Cole shows that the "gas
chamber" that has been displayed to hundreds of thousands of tourists
is actually a propaganda prop. Alicia, an official tour guide, assures
David Cole, on camera, that the "gas chamber" in the main camp that is
shown to visitors is in its original, unaltered state. Then Dr.
Franciszek Piper, head curator of the Auschwitz State Museum,
acknowledges to Cole that this "gas chamber" is actually a postwar
creation. This video also tackles other Holocaust claims, including
the "human soap" fable. Shows that fraudulent "proofs" of homicidal
gassings were produced after the end of World War II, and that
visitors to the Auschwitz camp site have been systematically deceived
for decades.
Post by _ G O D _
And just like defeat of Germany, -
an Iraqi defeat by US was a mere excuse for deployment
of the military force in mass extermination of peaceful and
innocent people for the sake of testing the new weaponry...
Because US is practicing slavery and genocide now more
than it was before the adoption of the Universal Charter of
Human Rights, which clearly abolished all forms of slavery
and genocide. Its prisons - is an evidence of this practice.
Prisons were invented and designed specifically for brute
oppression of people. Because they are main instruments
of slavery and genocide in favor of unfair capitalization on
slave labor of hostages of the incarceration industry, if not
to practice perverse habits of sadistic guards and tyrants.
Perverse sadistic satisfaction from seeing agony in eyes
of helpless and defenceless hostages of the incarceration
industry, in addition to US' gulag economy, is still being a
strong driving force for sadistic COck-sucking americunts
(and other profiteers from exploitation of slave workforce)
to do everything in their power to perpetuate its existence...
Hence, it does not matter, whether this person has been to
prison, to "write about one's prison experiences, but it's a
an extremely valid cause and a noble obligation of every
person to reveal and to do on whatever in one's power to
stop every violation of Human Rights.
A person doesn't have to commit a crime, in order for him
to get in position of victim of the incarceration industry, or
to find oneself at the disadvantage to the predatory tactics
of completely corrupt Judicial System, in order to become
hostage of gulag economy. And one does not have to be
in prison, in order to be a defender of the Human Rights...
I have many friends, relatives and loved ones, who indeed,
have suffered injustice of incarceration solely on the basis
of their timidity. Their trust was betrayed by corrupt Judicial
System, whose first prerogative became perpetuation of
the incarceration industry over the Human Rights to justice
and dignity of people who undeservingly suffered violation
of their sacred rights, which should've been left preserved
and upheld even if they indeed, have committed a crime...
Inadvertently, inalienable rights of people must be always
honored, and their guilt should never be exploited, lest an
artificial suffering of miseries and hardship inflicted upon
them, regardless of the outlook individuals on both side of
the "punishment." Because everyone knows that there are
sadistic people out there, as well as masochists with their
perverse sense of satisfaction and twisted reconciliation....
Fairness is impossible to achieve by means of the totally
corrupt Judicial System, which does not equally address
all of the crimes of every particular individual, and without
consent to become victims of arbitrary infliction of misery
and hardship in violation of the human rights. Not all of the
committed their crimes have been caught and tried by fair
courts, let alone most of ongoing crimes is still committed
with complete impunity and under the cover of authorities.
Therefore, a state should not justify cruelty toward people
by methods of false pursuit of the fairness and subjecting
people to artificial hardship and misery of medieval forms
of slavery and genocide via incarceration and other brutal
violations of Human Rights. Because it must play a role of
upholder of law and the sacred rights of its residents-alike.
--
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
Alric Knebel
2006-04-04 17:24:54 UTC
Permalink
[copy-paste article deleted]
No matter how many times you copy and paste the same few articles, your
reality is not altered one bit: YOU are inferior to most of humankind,
be they black, red, straight, gay -- whatever. In fact, that you can't
defend your supremacist ideology with your own thoughts proves my point,
that you're an empty-headed weakling, a man of inferior quality and
fiber, having nothing really to contribute; nothing to contribute, that
is, beyond shouting "Here!" when you hear your name at roll call down at
the weekly bunker meetings. Goaded by your awareness of your
inferiority, you exploit this supremacist ideology because it allows you
to hide your individual shortcomings within the perceived
accomplishments of the white race. You're a white supremacist because
your WHITENESS turns out to be the only estimated asset you have to
promote, and any esteem you have hinges solely on your forsaking your
individuality. By promoting it (your whiteness) -- with its alleged
higher IQ averages and subsequent inventiveness -- you subsume your
identity into the history of the white race, coattailing on the
achievements of others by conscripting them into your white collective.
In reality, you exist on the fringes of humanity, regardless of your
race, on the most primitive margins, and unfit for the future of
humanity. Those are the facts, my little goose-stepper. If you don't
take steps to reclaim your individuality, you're going to die a
gibbering nitwit, as ignorant as the day you were born. Yours will be a
life unlived, undeveloped, mired in a primitive ideology, and unaware of
the splendor of the modern world, the potential for humanity's future. A
willfully sad, sad case indeed.
--
Alric Knebel
http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com
Alric Knebel
2006-04-01 23:50:23 UTC
Permalink
[copy-paste article deleted]
No matter how many times you copy and paste the same few articles, your
reality is not altered one bit: YOU are inferior to most of humankind,
be they black, red, straight, gay -- whatever. In fact, that you can't
defend your supremacist ideology with your own thoughts proves my point,
that you're an empty-headed weakling, a man of inferior quality and
fiber, having nothing really to contribute; nothing to contribute, that
is, beyond shouting "Here!" when you hear your name at roll call down at
the weekly bunker meetings. Goaded by your awareness of your
inferiority, you exploit this supremacist ideology because it allows you
to hide your individual shortcomings within the perceived
accomplishments of the white race. You're a white supremacist because
your WHITENESS turns out to be the only estimated asset you have to
promote, and any esteem you have hinges solely on your forsaking your
individuality. By promoting it (your whiteness) -- with its alleged
higher IQ averages and subsequent inventiveness -- you subsume your
identity into the history of the white race, coattailing on the
achievements of others by conscripting them into your white collective.
In reality, you exist on the fringes of humanity, regardless of your
race, on the most primitive margins, and unfit for the future of
humanity. Those are the facts, my little goose-stepper. If you don't
take steps to reclaim your individuality, you're going to die a
gibbering nitwit, as ignorant as the day you were born. Yours will be a
life unlived, undeveloped, mired in a primitive ideology, and unaware of
the splendor of the modern world, the potential for humanity's future. A
willfully sad, sad case indeed.
--
Alric Knebel
http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com
R***@hotmail.com
2006-04-02 03:50:55 UTC
Permalink
When I read this type of crap it reminds me of some of the things I've
heard people saying about other groups of folks.

Some people blame women for "getting themselve's raped".

Some people think that blacks and latinos fill our prisons because they
are "inherently more stupid" than others.

Some people think that "all inmates are liars".

And some people think that "all cops are pigs".

And, you know when the Japanese held POWs in their camps, I'm sure that
they found ways to justify their cruelty.

The Iraqi's no doubt felt quiet justified when torturing Kuwaitis, and
the Hutus no doubt felt that they were doing the right thing when they
butchered the Tutsis.

I'm quite certain that the Germans had convinced themselves that it was
OK to hate the Jews. I dont know what their laundry list of reasons was
but they definately did murder at least 6 million.

There are some pretty atrocious things happening in this country right
now - and when people say stupid things it just creates more confusion
and anger - which is precisely what they desire.
_ G O D _
2006-04-03 02:03:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by R***@hotmail.com
Some people blame women for "getting themselve's raped".
Right. Expression of sexuality isn't an invitation
to rape, and it should not be used as an excuse
for an assault and justification of some people's
sadistic cruelty toward their defenceless victims.

Nevertheless it happens only on the basis that
it's being allowed in the court of law for money,
or because of total corruption of judicial system...
Post by R***@hotmail.com
Some people think that blacks and latinos fill our prisons
because they are "inherently more stupid" than others.
Actually it's the ongoing perpetuation of slavery
and genocide by totally corrupt judicial system
that uses racist laws for purpose of illegal and
unfair capitalization from exploitation of slaves
of gulag economy in the capacity of defenceless
hostages of the predatory incarceration industry,-
that leads to the disproportion among its victims
on racial basis. Because historically in US, even
before the incarceration industry, a slavery was
practiced on the racial basis against blacks by
white people. The incarceration industry simply
has widened the range of practice of slavery on
racial basis, but the traditional momentum of the
racial prejudice has resulted in disproportion of
the victims slightly more "in favor" of white race...

Because white people are just as misfortunate,
when it comes to violation of their sacred rights...
Post by R***@hotmail.com
Some people think that "all inmates are liars".
Only sadistic COck-sucking americunts, who are
looking for justification of their atrocities against
defenceless fellow humans with total impunity, will
be interested in perpetuation of this obvious myth.
Post by R***@hotmail.com
And some people think that "all cops are pigs".
Word "pigs" is not being used to describe cops'
look, and has nothing to do with figure of speech,
because it's the same word adopted from slang....
Post by R***@hotmail.com
And, you know when the Japanese held POWs in their
camps, I'm sure that they found ways to justify their cruelty.
True. Just as sadistic COck-sucking americunts
were (and still are) justifying their cruelty against
their fellow countrymen held inside their prisons....
Post by R***@hotmail.com
The Iraqi's no doubt felt quiet justified when torturing
Kuwaitis, and the Hutus no doubt felt that they were
doing the right thing when they butchered the Tutsis.
Not only justifying, but also - believing that it's the
best and a most fair thing that could ever happen
to their victims... Or at least this is what they have
been told to believe by authorities and the media.
Post by R***@hotmail.com
I'm quite certain that the Germans had convinced themselves
that it was OK to hate the Jews. I dont know what their laundry
list of reasons was but they definately did murder at least 6 million.
During my studying years at school I've learned
much larger figure of their victims. But why should
we talk about the violations of human rights that
happened long before existence of the Universal
Charter of Human Rights, which was created for
specific purpose to avoid such violations in future?
Because there are way too many currently going
violation of the Human Rights in just every country...
Post by R***@hotmail.com
There are some pretty atrocious things happening in this
country right now - and when people say stupid things it
just creates more confusion and anger....
There is no confusion about ongoing deliberate
perpetuation of the Human Rights by the corrupt
Judicial System, which should've been reformed
long ago. But it is not too late to start about now...
--
---
_____________________________________________________

I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers
along with all institutions of the industrialized slavery and genocide.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvies, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
___________________________________________________
--
Topaz
2006-04-04 00:59:49 UTC
Permalink
"Whites are now the only group whose interests are not being promoted
by state institutions, such as TV and the law.
There has been much talk in the controlled media recently about
'institutional racism' within the police, the education system, the
media and other public bodies. The very phrase 'institutional racism'
of course conceals the hidden liberal agenda, implying that anything
which protects or advances the interests of the white majority in our
own country is somehow wrong, and therefore needs to be rectified. In
fact, an objective examination of what is actually happening quickly
reveals that the only people to be the victims of serious and
sustained 'institutional racism' are - you've guessed it - native
British Whites!
Anti-white bias on television
One of the most powerful state institutions - some would argue the
most powerful - is of course the BBC, particularly BBC Television. Is
television 'racist' in the liberal sense of the word? It is hard to
see in what way ethnic minorities are being abused, under-represented
or attacked in any way on BBC TV (or indeed any of the independent TV
networks). On the contrary, the liberal élite who control this
formidable propaganda tool seem to go out of their way to show the
'ethnics' up almost always in the most positive light. Indeed, liberal
sensitivities on this subject are now so acute that there is a
tremendous outcry from the chattering classes if a member of an ethnic
minority is shown in an unflattering situation.
Witness the squeals of protest a few months ago when a black character
in the popular soap Coronation Street was depicted as a burglar. To
pacify the 'anti-racist' lobby, it now usually happens that on the
rare occasions when a TV crime drama features a black or Asian
lawbreaker this will be balanced by the appearance of an admirable
police constable from one of the ethnic minorities taking part in his
arrest, and then probably a lawyer from one of those minorities acting
as prosecution counsel in his trial - not to mention, of course, the
good dusky doctor who will be found treating him if he gets hurt!
Dramatic portrayals of pimps, drug-dealers, muggers, rapists and other
unsavoury characters in the various soaps are almost always played as,
and by, Whites.
Readers of this article will be all too familiar with the following
storyline:-
Evil white 'racist' leads hate campaign against innocent and loveable
black character, culminating in a dramatic and shocking act of
violence. At this point, point, the white racist's plan backfires. His
petrol bomb explodes prematurely (indicating also that he is stupid),
engulfing him in flames likely to result in a well-deserved death. But
wait! His intended black victim happens to come along at that very
moment, and selflessly risks his own life to save the racist.
Recovering in his hospital bed, the hapless white man is sternly
admonished by a liberal policeman/doctor/nurse (very possibly black)
on the evils of racism.
This liberal morality tale is simply a slightly more sophisticated
version of those mawkish 'anti-racist' films from the 1960s, often
starring the likes of Sidney Poitier. The liberal agenda which
underpins this type of nonsense might at first seem so laughable that
no intelligent, independently minded person could swallow it - until
it is remembered that the majority of people in our educationally
dumbed-down society are not intelligent or independently minded enough
to work things out for themselves. Nick Griffin (Spearhead No. 361)
gave a precise figure on this:-
"The most crucial fact of all is that diffusion research all over the
world has shown that only a very small proportion of any given
population - in the region of a mere 2.5 per cent - will ever make up
their own minds to adopt a new innovation."
How often have you heard someone self-righteously proclaim: "Of
course, I don't believe what I see on TV" - only to hear him a few
minutes later quite unconsciously parroting some liberal jargon he's
picked up from the box?
No joke
Promotion of the liberal agenda on television, whilst mostly unsubtle,
is in fact far from being laughable or puerile. It works, to a very
great extent. Most people watch television to be entertained, and
those who control the medium are well aware of this. This is why most
propaganda is disseminated, not through news or documentary
programmes, when people are more 'on their guard', but through
entertainment items such as the soaps and popular 'dramas'. This is
why shows like Eastenders portray a kind of liberal fantasy world,
free from racial conflict (unless introduced by sinister 'outsiders'),
where homosexual and bisexual characters rub shoulders with the rest
of the community at the Queen Vic (with no adverse criticism or
comment, even from the older people there), and the only person with
AIDS is a heterosexual. In this Alice-through-the-looking-glass world
of liberalism, anything goes, whether it be drug-taking, incest,
homosexuality or mixed marriages.
Anti-white stereotyping
If non-Whites have little cause for concern over 'institutional
racism' in the media, what of the majority white population? Here
there is cause for a great deal of concern. White people are regarded
as fair game for racial stereotyping. Any insult, falsehood or attack
may be levelled at us through the medium of television, and we will
not find pro-white 'watchdogs' then raising protest on our behalf.
Whole TV mini-series have been created to portray white history in a
bad light. Anyone watching Roots could be forgiven for thinking that
white people were the sole perpetrators of slavery and Africans its
sole victims. Never mind that slavery in America and the British
Empire lasted barely two hundred years, whilst elsewhere it existed
for thousands of years - and still exists.
And as for those beastly Germans, of course, a multibillion-dollar
entertainment industry has been created to vilify them. It has long
been a principle of law in civilised countries that if someone is
charged with a crime they are at least permitted a fair hearing to
defend themselves. This is certainly not the case with the German
Nation. Indeed, in some countries, notably France and Germany itself,
'Holocaust' denial is a criminal offence. If Basil Fawlty's
stereotyping of Germans had been directed at any other group - Jews,
Blacks, Asians - John Cleese would have been in a jail cell so fast
his feet would hardly have touched the ground.
Under-representation of whites
The other old chestnut trotted out by liberals is that there are not
enough ethnic-minority members among people in the media. This is the
biggest lie of all. Apart from the numerous black and Asian producers,
directors and administrative staff who work in the television
industry, there is one particular minority which is certainly vastly
over-represented at the highest levels. Considering that these people
amount to less than one per cent of the population as a whole, their
position at the top of British television is nothing less than
astonishing. One Alan Yentob is the Director of Programmes for BBC1
and BBC2. Channel Four is headed by Michael Grade (family name
Winogradsky), who replaced Jeremy Isaacs. Channel Five is owned by the
exotically named Moses Znaimer, and run by one David Elstein. The big
cheese at ITV is Michael Green, who owns the powerful Carlton TV.
ITV's controller of entertainment is Claudia Rosenkrantz. If we are to
tackle the problem of 'institutional racism', perhaps the best place
to start would be at the rotten heart of the British power structure.
It is time to get greater representation for indigenous Britons within
our own cultural institutions."
Robert Colby




http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
Alric Knebel
2006-04-04 17:25:07 UTC
Permalink
[copy-paste article deleted]
No matter how many times you copy and paste the same few articles, your
reality is not altered one bit: YOU are inferior to most of humankind,
be they black, red, straight, gay -- whatever. In fact, that you can't
defend your supremacist ideology with your own thoughts proves my point,
that you're an empty-headed weakling, a man of inferior quality and
fiber, having nothing really to contribute; nothing to contribute, that
is, beyond shouting "Here!" when you hear your name at roll call down at
the weekly bunker meetings. Goaded by your awareness of your
inferiority, you exploit this supremacist ideology because it allows you
to hide your individual shortcomings within the perceived
accomplishments of the white race. You're a white supremacist because
your WHITENESS turns out to be the only estimated asset you have to
promote, and any esteem you have hinges solely on your forsaking your
individuality. By promoting it (your whiteness) -- with its alleged
higher IQ averages and subsequent inventiveness -- you subsume your
identity into the history of the white race, coattailing on the
achievements of others by conscripting them into your white collective.
In reality, you exist on the fringes of humanity, regardless of your
race, on the most primitive margins, and unfit for the future of
humanity. Those are the facts, my little goose-stepper. If you don't
take steps to reclaim your individuality, you're going to die a
gibbering nitwit, as ignorant as the day you were born. Yours will be a
life unlived, undeveloped, mired in a primitive ideology, and unaware of
the splendor of the modern world, the potential for humanity's future. A
willfully sad, sad case indeed.
--
Alric Knebel
http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com
Topaz
2006-04-03 01:57:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by R***@hotmail.com
When I read this type of crap it reminds me of some of the things I've
heard people saying about other groups of folks.
Some people blame women for "getting themselve's raped".
Some people think that blacks and latinos fill our prisons because they
are "inherently more stupid" than others.
Some people think that "all inmates are liars".
And some people think that "all cops are pigs".
And, you know when the Japanese held POWs in their camps, I'm sure that
they found ways to justify their cruelty.
The Iraqi's no doubt felt quiet justified when torturing Kuwaitis, and
the Hutus no doubt felt that they were doing the right thing when they
butchered the Tutsis.
Eyewitness account by Mrs. Leonora Geier (nee Cavoa, born Oct 22,
1925, Sao Paulo,
Brazil) to Dr. Trutz Foelsche, Ph.D

Deutsche Nationalzeitung, No. 17-65, p. 7:

"On the morning of February, 16, (1945) a Russian detachment
occupied the RAD
(Reichsarbeitsdienst) camp Vilmsee near Neustettin. The Commissar told
me in good
German language that the camp was dissolved and that we, as a unit
with uniforms (RAD - German Labour Service, not military uniforms),
would be transported to a collection camp. Since I, as a Brazilian
citizen, belong to an allied nation, he asked me to take over
as a leader of the transport that went to Neustettin, into the yard of
the former iron factory. We were about 500 girls (Maidens of the
Reichsarbeitsdienst - German Labour Service).

He said I could come into the orderly room, which I accepted.
Immediately he directed
me to make no further contact with other women, because they were
members of an illegal army. On my response that this what not true, he
cut me off with the remark that I would be shot immediately, if I
would repeat in any form a similar statement.

"Suddenly I heard loud screams, and promptly five girls were brought
in by the two Red Armists. The Commissar ordered them to undress. When
they, in a sense of shame, refused to do so, he ordered me to undress
them and follow him with the girls. We walked through the yard to the
former factory kitchen, which was completely cleared out
except for some tables along the window wall. It was dreadfully cold
and the unfortunate girls trembled. In the huge tiled room several
Russians waited for us who were obviously making obscene remarks
because every word was followed by loud laughter.
The Commissar then directed me to watch how one makes sissies out of
'The Master Race'.
Now two Poles, clad in trousers only, entered the room. At their
sight the girls cried out.
Briskly, they seized the first of the two girls and bent her over with
her back over the edge of the table until her joints cracked. I almost
fainted when one of the men pulled his knife and cut off her right
breast in the presence of the other girls. I have never heard a
human being scream as desperately as this young woman. After this
'operation' both men stabbed her several times in the abdomen,
accompanied by the howling of the Russians.
The next girl cried for mercy, in vain, since she was exceptionally
pretty. I had the impression that the 'work' was carried out very
slowly. The other three girls were completely broken down, cried for
their mothers and begged for a speedy death, but also
fate them overtook.
The last of the girls was still half a child, with barely developed
breasts, one tore the
flesh literally from her ribs until the white bone appeared.
Again, five girls were brought in. This time, they had been selected
carefully. All were
developed and pretty. When they saw the bodies of their predecessors,
they began to cry and scream. Weak as they were, they tried to defend
themselves but to no avail; the Poles became more cruel every time.
One of the girls, they cut open her womb and trunk over the whole
length; poured a can of machine oil into the mutilated body and tried
to set fire
to it. Another was shot in the genitals by a Russia, before they cut
off her breasts.
A great howling began when someone brought a saw from a toolbox.
Now, using the saw, they set to work to the breasts of the girls to
pieces, which in a short period of time
led to the floor being covered with blood. A blood rage seized the
Russians. Continuously
one of them brought more and more girls.
Like a red fog, I saw the gruesome happenings again and again and I
perceived the inhuman screaming at the torture of their breasts and
the load groaning at the mutilation of their private parts. When my
legs failed me I was forced into a chair. The Commissar persistently
watched me to make sure I was looking toward the torture scenes. In
fact, when I had to vomit, they even paused with their tortures. One
girl had not undressed completely, she may have been somewhat older
than the rest of the girls who were about 17-years old. One of the
torturers soaked her bra with oil and ignited it and, while she cried
out, another drove a thin iron rod into her vagina until it emerged at
her naval.
In the yard they liquidated entire groups of girls, after they had
selected the prettiest ones for the torture room. The air was filled
with the death cries of many hundreds of girls. But in view of what
happened here, the slaughter outside could be considered more humane.
It was a dreadful fact that not one of the girls brought into the
torture room lost here consciousness.
In their horror all were equal in their expressions. It was always
the same; the begging for mercy, the high-pitched scream when their
breasts were cut and their genitals mutilated. Several times the
slaughter was interrupted to sweep out the blood and to clear away the
corpses.
That evening I sank into a severe nerve fever. From then on I lack
any recollection
until the moment I awoke in a military hospital. German troops had
recaptured Neustettin temporarily, and had liberated us. As I learned
later, approximately 2,000 girls were murdered during the first three
days of the first round of Russian occupation."
Post by R***@hotmail.com
I'm quite certain that the Germans had convinced themselves that it was
OK to hate the Jews. I dont know what their laundry list of reasons was
but they definately did murder at least 6 million.
There are some pretty atrocious things happening in this country right
now - and when people say stupid things it just creates more confusion
and anger - which is precisely what they desire.
http://www.noontidepress.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=35&products_id=357
Filmed on location at the Auschwitz camp site in Poland, this stunning
video by Jewish-American investigator David Cole shows that the "gas
chamber" that has been displayed to hundreds of thousands of tourists
is actually a propaganda prop. Alicia, an official tour guide, assures
David Cole, on camera, that the "gas chamber" in the main camp that is
shown to visitors is in its original, unaltered state. Then Dr.
Franciszek Piper, head curator of the Auschwitz State Museum,
acknowledges to Cole that this "gas chamber" is actually a postwar
creation. This video also tackles other Holocaust claims, including
the "human soap" fable. Shows that fraudulent "proofs" of homicidal
gassings were produced after the end of World War II, and that
visitors to the Auschwitz camp site have been systematically deceived
for decades.


http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
R***@hotmail.com
2006-04-03 04:03:34 UTC
Permalink
I'm not Jewish, but I'm disgusted by this shit you write.

Yes, the Russians raped and pillaged their way across Europe. So ? They
murdered 60 million of their own, and Stalin murdered half of his own
family with his own two hands. So ?

And we did some things to them that were'nt so nice as well. What do
you expect ?

But denying the Holocaust is quite simply not correct. Hitler and his
pals were murderous feinds who lost their minds 20 years earlier in the
trenches of WW1. They ate, slept, and lived among mud field which were
littered with body parts, death, and complete madness.

It is quite easy to see how Hitler lost his mind. It's really very sad.
But they did murder 6 million people, and their stated objective was to
murder every last Jew.

I have known many, many WW2 vets, and not a single one of them would
agree with your denials. You are full of shit. Quit blaming Jews for
your problems and get yourself unfucked.
Topaz
2006-04-04 00:51:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by R***@hotmail.com
I'm not Jewish, but I'm disgusted by this shit you write.
Yes, the Russians raped and pillaged their way across Europe. So ?
Article Winston Churchill wrote in 1920:

"This movement amongst the Jews (the Russian Revolution) is not new.
From the days of Spartacus Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down
to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kuhn (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany)
and Emma Goldman (United States), this world wide conspiracy for the
overthrow of civilization and the reconstruction of society on the
basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible
equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer,
Mrs. Nesta Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part
in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of
every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at
last this band of extraordinary personalities has gripped the Russian
people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the
undisputed masters of that enormous empire. There is no need to
exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the
actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international
and for the most part atheistic Jews. Moreover, the principal
inspiration and driving power comes from Jewish leaders." (ibid)


Lev Trotzky wrote a book called "Stalin: An Appraisal of the Man
and His Influence", Harper Bros., New York and London, 1941,
translated by Charles Malamuth.

In this book he told who the principle members of the October
Central Committee were. This group was the leadership of the Bolshevik
Party during the October Revolution. This is what he wrote:

"In view of the Party's semi-legality the names of persons
elected by secret ballot were not announced at the Congress, with the
exception of the four who had recieved the largest number of votes.
Lenin--133 out of a possible 134, Zinoviev--132, Kamenev--131,
Trotzky--131."

Of these four top leaders of the Bolshevik Party the last three
were known Jews. Lenin was thought to be a gentile married to a
Jewess. It was later proven that he was one quarter Jewish, London
Jewish Chronicle April 21, 1995, Lenin: Life and Legacy.

David Francis, the American Ambassador to Russia at the time of the
Revolution, wrote:

"The Bolshevic leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent
of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other
country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a
world-wide revolution."

The Director of British Intelligence to the U.S. Secretary of State
wrote this:

"There is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international
movement controlled by Jews."

In 1945 the FBI arrested six individuals for stealing 1700 highly
confidential documents from State Department files. This was the
Amerasia case they were:

Philip Jaffe, a Russian Jew who came to the U.S. in 1905. He was at
one time the editor of the communist paper "Labor Defense" and the
ringleader of the group arrested.

Andrew Roth, a Jew.

Mark Gayn, a Jew, changed his name from Julius Ginsberg.

John Service, a gentile.

Emmanuel Larsen, nationality unknown

Kate Mitchel, nationality unknown.

In 1949 the Jewess Judith Coplin was caught passing classified
documents from Justice Department files to a Russian agent.

The highest ranking communist brought to trial in the U.S. was
Gerhart Eisler. He was a Jew. He was the secret boss of the Communist
Party in the U.S. and commuted regularly between the U.S. and Russia.

In 1950 there was the "Hollywood Ten" case. Ten leading film
writers of the Hollywood Film Colony were convicted for contempt of
Congress and sentanced to prison. Nine of the ten were Jews. Six of
the ten were communist party members and the other four were
flagrantly pro-communist.

One of the top new stories of 1949 was the trial of Eugene Dennis
and the Convicted Eleven. This group comprised the National
Secretariat of the American Communist Party. Six were Jews, two
gentiles, three nationality unknown.

Also in 1949 the German-born atomic scientist Klaus Fuchs was
convicted for passing atomic secrets to the Russians. Acting on
information obtained from Fuchs the FBI arrested nine other members of
the ring. All of them were convicted. Eight of the nine were Jews.

Here are some quotes from a very pro-Jewish book that was first
published in 1925. The book is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis
Browne.

"But save for such exceptions, the Jews who led or participated
in the heroic efforts to remold the world of the last century, were
neither Reform or Orthodox. Indeed, they were often not professing
Jews at all.
"For instance, there was Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne, both
unfaltering champions of freedom. And even more conspicuously, there
was Karl Marx, one of the great prophetic geniuses of modern times.
"Jewish historians rarely mention the name of this man, Karl
Marx, though in his life and spirit he was far truer to the mission of
Israel than most of those who were forever talking of it. He was born
in Germany in 1818, and belonged to an old rabbinic family. He was not
himself reared as a Jew, however, but while still a child was baptized
a Christian by his father. Yet the rebel soul of the Jew flamed in him
thoughout his days, for he was always a 'troubler' in Europe."


"Then, of course, there are Ludwig Borne and Heinrich Heine, two
men who by their merciless wit and sarcasm became leaders among the
revolutionary writers. Karl Marx, Ferdinand Lassalle, Johann Jacoby,
Gabriel Riesser, Adolphe Cremieux, Signora Nathan- all these of Jewish
lineage played important roles in the struggle that went thoughout
Europe in this period. Wherever the war for human liberty was being
waged, whether in France, Germany, Austria, Hungary, or Italy, there
the Jew was to be found. It was little wonder that the enemies of
social progress, the monarchists and the Churchmen, came to speak of
the whole liberal movement as nothing but a Jewish plot."

The book "Soviet Russia and the Jews" by Gregor Aronson and
published by the American Jewish League Against Communism, quotes
Stalin in an interview in 1931 with the Jewish Telegraph Agency.
Stalin said:

"...Communists cannot be anything but outspoken enemies of
Anti-Semitism. We fight anti-Semites by the strongest methods in the
Soviet Union. Active anti-Semites are punished by death under the
law."

The following quotes are taken directly from documents available from
the
U.S. Archives:

State Department document 861.00/1757 sent May 2, 1918 by U.S. consul
general in Moscow, Summers: "Jews prominant in local Soviet
government, anti-Jewish feeling growing among population...."

State Department document 861.00/2205 was sent from Vladivostok on
July 5, 1918 by U.S. consul Caldwell: "Fifty percent of Soviet
government in each town consists of Jews of the worst type."

From the Headquarters of the American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia
on
March 1, 1919, comes this telegram from Omsk by Chief of Staff, Capt.
Montgomey Shuyler: "It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the
United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since it's
beginning, guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest
type"
type."

A second Schuyler telegram, dated June 9, 1919 from Vladivostok,
reports on the make-up of the presiding Soviet government:
"...(T)here
were 384 `commissars' including 2 negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen,
22 Armenians, AND MORE THAN 300 JEWS. Of the latter number, 264 had
come to Russia from the United States since the downfall of the
Imperial Government.

The Netherlands' ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, confirmed this:
"Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to
spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it
is
organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one
object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of
things."
"The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in
Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish
dissatisfaction
and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental an
physical forces, become a reality all over the world." (The American
Hebrew, September 10, 1920

"In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the membership of the Soviet
communist party was Jewish, though Jews comprised only 1.8 percent of
the total population." (Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)

Interestingly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make
so-called "anti-Semitism" a capital crime. This is confirmed by
Stalin
himself:

"National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic
customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism,
as
an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige
of
cannibalism...under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the
death penalty." (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).


Here is a quote from Mein Kampf:

"Making an effort to overcome my natural reluctance, I tried
to
read articles of this nature published in the Marxist Press; but in
doing
so my aversion increased all the more. And then I set about learning
something of the people who wrote and published this mischievous
stuff.
From the publisher downwards, all of them were Jews. I recalled to
mind the
names of the public leaders of Marxism, and then I realized that most
of
them belonged to the Chosen Race- the Social Democratic
representatives in
the Imperial Cabinet as well as the secretaries if the Trades Unions
and
the street agitators. Everywhere the same sinister picture presented
itself. I shall never forget the row of names- Austerlitz, David,
Adler,
Ellonbogen, and others. One fact became quite evident to me. It was
that
this alien race held in its hands the leadership of that Social
Democratic
Party with whose minor representatives I had been disputing for
months
past."

Solzhenitsyn named in his book the six top administrators of the
Soviet death camps. All six of them were Jews.

Here is something the National Socialists wrote:

"The Soviet Union was in fact a paradise for one group: the Jews. Even
at times when for foreign policy reasons Jews were less evident in the
government, or when they ruled through straw men, the Jews were always
visible in the middle and lower levels of the administration."
Post by R***@hotmail.com
They
murdered 60 million of their own, and Stalin murdered half of his own
family with his own two hands. So ?
Here are quotes from a speech delivered by Dr. Joseph Goebbels
at the National Socialist Party Congress, Nuernberg, 1937.

"'Spain represents the world at the cross-roads.' Thus wrote
the Bolshevic press organ, Die Rundschau, in its issue dated July 22,
1937. That one sentance precisely defines the international
significance of the Spanish problem. It states exactly what the
Spanish problem is. Here the final decision must lie either with
Bolshevism or the principle of Authority. On the one side stands
ruinous anarchy and, on the other, orderly constructive development."

"Nations which in recent years have kept their eyes closed to
the startling growth of the international Bolshevic menace will one
day experience a terrible awakening from this moral narcosis. The fact
that we, German National Socialists, as conscious and uncompromising
protaganists against the Bolshevic world-front, are still condemned to
play the part of a preacher in the wilderness, calling out to deaf
ears--this cannot prevent us from seeing things as they are and
calling them by their right names. For if the constantly increasing
extension of this Bolshevic infection in Europe should cause still
greater disaster, then future historians will be in a position to
record the fact that we, German National Socialists, were not among
those who allowed themselves to be led astray in the universal chaos
of thought and mental fog purposely created as a sort of smoke-screen
by an insidious epidemic of political propaganda. Nothing could make
us deviate in the least from the straight road we have taken.
"From the very nature of the case it is obvious that the
subversive forces of International Jewry will raise a tumult of rage
when we clearly and dispassionately lay bare the background of this
revolutionary developement which is extending through the world. For,
after all, they are the only people who are drawing profit forn the
chaotic ruin which Bolshevism is bringing upon mankind. That on this
account they will swamp us with a torrrent of abuse and lies and
calumnies is only an honour for us and a further proof that we are
right in warning Europe against this peril."

"The fight which General Franco is waging, with the support of all
the constructive elements, against the Bolshevic menace to his native
land is at the same time a fight for civilization."

"The Moscow Comintern never tires of impressing on public
opinion thoughout the world the theory that the national movement,
which on July 17, 1936, intervened in the seething developements in
Spain, was a military rising oragnised by reactionary generals and
that this rising was definately repudiated by the Spanish people. The
truth however is that this national movement was in reality an act of
self-defence on the part of the people, against the revolt which had
been planned by the Spanish Communist Party for that time and was
subsequently postponed to August 1936. This communist revolt had been
planned in Moscow several years previously, organized from Moscow and
directed from Moscow, and is still being carried out in practice from
Moscow today."

"In 1935 the annual funds which Moscow contributed for the
support of the Communist Party in Spain totalled several million
pesetas, of which two millions were officially acknowledged as having
been paid by the Comintern itself. At the 7th World Congress of the
Comintern in Moscow, in 1935, Dimitroff gave instructions for the
formation of a Front Populaire in Spain. Between February 16 and April
19,1936, 140 people were murdered by gangs of red revolutionaries, and
529 buildings were burned down and destroyed before the Bolshevic
Revolution officially broke out."

"We can account for this baffling style of mutual admiration
between Bolshevism and Western Liberalist Intellectualism only if we
assume it to be some form of mental disease."

"During February and March 101 Russian Soviet aeroplanes were shipped
from Reval to Spain. And on March 1st, 50 heavy guns from Soviet
Russia were brought overland to Almansa. Recently one single large
consignment of was material from Soviet Russia to the Reds in Spain
included 100 heavy tanks, 500 medium-sized tanks, 2000 light tanks,
4000 heavy machine guns, 6000 light machine guns and 300 aeroplanes,
with their pilots."

"I shall now deal with some instances which will help to give an
idea of the extent to which World Liberalism goes in its moral support
of the Reds in Spain. I have already emphasized the fact that the
marriage between Bolshevism and Democracy presents some uncanny
features; indeed one might call them downright perverse. In the
historical developement of its activities Democracy has more and more
become the political facade of World Capitalism. Bolshevism now
carries the democratic principle to its ultimate logical application.
We may call it the Democracy of Terror. It increases the pace of that
sanguinary and pitiless developement of which Liberalism had already
mapped out the path. I might illustrate this point by a rather drastic
comparison. In democracy leading heads were out-voted by the counting
of heads. In Bolshevism the same result is obtained by chopping off
heads with the guillotine. The result in both cases is the same. The
heads are wanting. The masses are robbed of their natural leaders and
left prey to international Jews, who are now free to exercise their
dictatorship by the employment of terrorization and money."

"Pleasing catchwords were used to win the favour of the
workers but when the communist leaders came into power social terror
became the rule of the day. Among the workers and peasant classes
hunger prevailed, as symbol and sign of the Bolshevic rule."

"In keeping with the Soviet Russian pettern, family life and
the instituton of marriage are being ruined by this world plague.
Degradation of married women, the socialization of women, the
martyrdom of children--these are the principles which are in vogue
here."

"According to the 'Daily Mail' of August 22, 1936, Twenty-eight
nuns from the convent of Santa Clara "were subjected to inconceivable
tortures by relays of red maniacs."

"But Bolshevism in practice is nothing better than the most
frightful find of barbarism. It is the outward expression of the
hatred of the underworld agianst all those who are representative of
Western civilization and a cultural level to which Bolshevism can
never hope to attain."

"Among the 20,000 churches and monasteries which the Reds have
plundered and destroyed many were of historical and architectual
significance which cannot be replaced."

"But the churches of the world remain passive to it all and do not
seem to have the least suspicion as to the deadly menace that
threatens them. This is where Bolshevism shows itself again as the
incarnation of evil. Its destructive influence on the popular
religious instinct goes to the very roots of that instinct itself. And
this ruthless atheistic campaign spares nothing whatsoever which might
serve to remind the people of God and religion. The one fact alone
that the Fuerer has saved the German churches from this fate should be
enough to make them feel bound to remain eternally thankful to him.
But instead of this they never tire of going beyond the sphere of
their religious duties, interfering in political matters and making
their influence felt in a way that has no connection whatsoever with
their duties or their divine calling."

"According to indisputable figures based exclusively on
Bolshevic statistics, 42,000 priests have been murdered in Russia. Up
to February 2,1937, approximately 17,000 priests and monks and eleven
bishops were murdered in Spain."

"A Swedish refugee stated, on November 10, 1936: 'I have seen
churches on the walls of which the murdered bodies of women were hung,
nuns that had been beheaded or burned and whose bodies had been nailed
in rows to the church walls."

"The Strassburg paper, 'Der Elsasser', in its issue of
February 27, 1937 published the staggering fact that '50,000 Spanish
children are at the present moment wandering through Spanish
provinces, abandoned and in rags. All public activities for the
welfare of the youth have been abolished. And so the youngsters, very
often no more than four or five years old, are left no alternative.
They stagger along the road in swarms, shivering with cold and are
nothing more than wandering skeletons.'"

"One shudders to think what might happen to humanity if this
system became universal throughout the world."

"Bolshevism and its 'friendly press' throughout the world lose no
opportunity of pointing an accusing finger at the alleged use of
terror in countries which are governed according to the principles of
authority. The whole world gives a cry of agonizing sympathy when, for
example, a Jew in Germany receives a well-earned box on the ears. But
what is this when compared with the terror that disrupts whole
nations"

"Lenin himself, when asked at the 12th Congress of the Red Party,
what were the principles on which Communism relied, answered: 'Murder,
destruction, not a stone to be left in place if its removal should be
to the advantage of the Revolution.'"

"The Jewish Soviet Ambassador in London finds it convenient to
express his moral indignation before the Non-Intervention Committee in
London. The world and the League of Nations are hypocritically
appealed to. Before these tribunals the Jew Litwinow-Finkelstein plays
the part of the civilised philistine and fills Europe with cries of
protest."

"The Intenational Brigades which are sent into action on the Red
Spanish front are commanded by Soviet officers. Their commander was
the Jew, General Kleber."

"We shall not be deterred from pointing to the Jew as the inspirer,
the instigator and the beneficiary of the dreadful catastrophe."

"At Barcelona he sits, in the person of Wladimer Bischitzki as
director of the international oragnization for the smuggling of arms
and munitions, comrades Lurje and Fuchs, of his own racial breed,
sitting by his side. His Paris agents are his racial compatriots,
Fratkin, Rosenfeld and Schapiro. At Hirtenberg in Austria their
collaborator is the Jew, Mandl. In Amsterdam the Jew, Wolf. In
Rotteerdam the Jews, Cohen, Gruenfeld, Kirsch, and Simon. In Denmark
the Jew, Moses Israel Diamant. In Prague the Jews, Kindler, Kahn,
Abter and Hithner. We know them all and we know them well."

"The fact that Western Liberalism closes its eyes to this evil
portent is only a sign of its almost childish naivety."

"A struggle for native land and liberty, for honour and family
and God and religion, for wife and child, for school and upbringing,
for order, moral principle, culture and civilization, for our lives
and our daily bread , has begun. In Germany it has already been
brought to a triumphant issue."
Post by R***@hotmail.com
And we did some things to them that were'nt so nice as well. What do
you expect ?
But denying the Holocaust is quite simply not correct.
http://www.noontidepress.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=35&products_id=357
Filmed on location at the Auschwitz camp site in Poland, this stunning
video by Jewish-American investigator David Cole shows that the "gas
chamber" that has been displayed to hundreds of thousands of tourists
is actually a propaganda prop. Alicia, an official tour guide, assures
David Cole, on camera, that the "gas chamber" in the main camp that is
shown to visitors is in its original, unaltered state. Then Dr.
Franciszek Piper, head curator of the Auschwitz State Museum,
acknowledges to Cole that this "gas chamber" is actually a postwar
creation. This video also tackles other Holocaust claims, including
the "human soap" fable. Shows that fraudulent "proofs" of homicidal
gassings were produced after the end of World War II, and that
visitors to the Auschwitz camp site have been systematically deceived
for decades.
Post by R***@hotmail.com
Hitler and his
pals were murderous feinds who lost their minds 20 years earlier in the
ADOLF HITLER
SCHWERIN, GUSTLOFF'S FUNERAL
SPEECH OF FEBRUARY 12, 1936

. . . BEHIND every murder stood the same power which is responsible
for this murder; behind these harmless insignificant fellow-countrymen
who were instigated and incited to crime stands the hate-filled power
of our Jewish foe, a foe to whom we had done no harm, but who none the
less sought to subjugate our German people and make of it its slave -
the foe who is responsible for all the misfortune that fell upon us in
1918, for all the misfortune which plagued Germany in the years that
followed. Those members of the Party and honorable comrades of ours
all fell, and the same fate was planned for others: many hundreds
survived as cripples or severely wounded, blinded or lamed; more than
40,000 others were injured. And among them were so many loyal folk
whom we all knew and who were near and dear to us, of whom we were
sure that they could never do any harm to anyone, that they had never
done any harm to anyone, whose only crime was that they devoted
themselves to the cause of Germany.

In the ranks of those whose lives were thus sacrificed there stood
also Horst Wessel, the singer who gave to the Movement its song, never
dreaming that he would join those spirits who march and have marched
with us.

And now on foreign soil National Socialism has gained its first
conscious martyr - a man who did nothing save to enter the lists for
Germany which is not only his sacred right but his duty in this world:
a man who did nothing save remember his homeland and pledge himself to
her in loyalty. He, too, was murdered, just like so many others. Even
at the time when on January 30 three years ago we had come into power,
precisely the same things happened in Germany, at Frankfort on the
Oder, at Köpenick, and again at Brunswick. The procedure was always
the same: a few men come and call someone out of his house and then
stab or shoot him down.

That is no chance: it is the same guiding hand which organized these
crimes and purposes to do so again. Now for the first time one who is
responsible for these acts has appeared in his own person. For the
first time he employs no harmless German fellow-countryman. It is a
title to fame for Switzerland, as it is for our own Germans in
Switzerland, that no one let himself be hired to do this deed so that
for the first time the spiritual begetter of the act must himself
perform the act. So our comrade has fallen a victim to that power
which wages a fanatical warfare not only against our German people but
against every free, autonomous, and independent people. We understand
the challenge to battle and we take up the gage! My dear comrade! You
have not fallen in vain!
Post by R***@hotmail.com
trenches of WW1. They ate, slept, and lived among mud field which were
littered with body parts, death, and complete madness.
It is quite easy to see how Hitler lost his mind. It's really very sad.
Leon Degrelle
"We have the power. Now our gigantic work begins."
Those were Hitler's words on the night of January 30, 1933, as
cheering crowds surged past him, for five long hours, beneath the
windows of the Chancellery in Berlin.
His political struggle had lasted 14 years. He himself was 43, that
is, physically and intellectually at the peak of his powers. He had
won over millions of Germans and organized them into Germany's largest
and most dynamic political party, a party girded by a human rampart of
hundreds of thousands of storm troopers, three fourths of them members
of the working class. He had been extremely shrewd. All but toying
with his adversaries, Hitler had, one after another, vanquished them
all.
Standing there at the window, his arm raised to the delirious throng,
he must have known a feeling of triumph. But he seemed almost torpid,
absorbed, as if lost in another world.
It was a world far removed from the delirium in the street, a world of
65 million citizens who loved him or hated him, but all of whom, from
that night on, had become his responsibility. And as he knew -- as
almost all Germans knew on January 1933 -- that this was a crushing,
an almost desperate responsibility.
Half a century later, few people understand the crisis Germany faced
at that time. Today, it's easy to assume that Germans have always been
well-fed and even plump. But the Germans Hitler inherited were virtual
skeletons.
During the preceding years, a score of "democratic" governments had
come and gone, often in utter confusion. Instead of alleviating the
people's misery, they had increased it, due to their own instability:
it was impossible for them to pursue any given plan for more than a
year or two. Germany had arrived at a dead end. In just a few years
there had been 224,000 suicides - a horrifying figure, bespeaking a
state of misery even more horrifying.
By the beginning of 1933, the misery of the German people was
virtually universal. At least six million unemployed and hungry
workers roamed aimlessly through the streets, receiving a pitiful
unemployment benefit of less than 42 marks per month. Many of those
out of work had families to feed, so that altogether some 20 million
Germans, a third of the country's population, were reduced to trying
to survive on about 40 pfennigs per person per day.
Unemployment benefits, moreover, were limited to a period of six
months. After that came only the meager misery allowance dispensed by
the welfare offices.
Notwithstanding the gross inadequacy of this assistance, by trying to
save the six million unemployed from total destruction, even for just
six months, both the state and local branches of the German government
saw themselves brought to ruin: in 1932 alone such aid had swallowed
up four billion marks, 57 percent of the total tax revenues of the
federal government and the regional states. A good many German
municipalities were bankrupt.
Those still lucky enough to have some kind of job were not much better
off. Workers and employees had taken a cut of 25 percent in their
wages and salaries. Twenty-one percent of them were earning between
100 and 250 marks per month; 69.2 percent of them, in January of 1933,
were being paid less than 1,200 marks annually. No more than about
100,000 Germans, it was estimated, were able to live without financial
worries.
During the three years before Hitler came to power, total earnings had
fallen by more than half, from 23 billion marks to 11 billion. The
average per capita income had dropped from 1,187 marks in 1929 to 627
marks, a scarcely tolerable level, in 1932. By January 1933, when
Hitler took office, 90 percent of the German people were destitute.
No one escaped the strangling effects of the unemployment. The
intellectuals were hit as hard as the working class. Of the 135,000
university graduates, 60 percent were without jobs. Only a tiny
minority was receiving unemployment benefits.
"The others," wrote one foreign observer, Marcel Laloire (in his book
New Germany), "are dependent on their parents or are sleeping in
flophouses. In the daytime they can be seen on the boulevards of
Berlin wearing signs on their backs to the effect that they will
accept any kind of work."
But there was no longer any kind of work.
The same drastic fall-off had hit Germany's cottage industry, which
comprised some four million workers. Its turnover had declined 55
percent, with total sales plunging from 22 billion to 10 billion
marks.
Hardest hit of all were construction workers; 90 percent of them were
unemployed.
Farmers, too, had been ruined, crushed by losses amounting to 12
billion marks. Many had been forced to mortgage their homes and their
land. In 1932 just the interest on the loans they had incurred due to
the crash was equivalent to 20 percent of the value of the
agricultural production of the entire country. Those who were no
longer able to meet the interest payments saw their farms auctioned
off in legal proceedings: in the years 1931-1932, 17,157 farms -- with
a combined total area of 462,485 hectares - were liquidated in this
way.
The "democracy" of Germany's "Weimar Republic" (1918 -1933) had proven
utterly ineffective in addressing such flagrant wrongs as this
impoverishment of millions of farm workers, even though they were the
nation's most stable and hardest working citizens. Plundered,
dispossessed, abandoned: small wonder they heeded Hitler's call.
Their situation on January 30, 1933, was tragic. Like the rest of
Germany's working class, they had been betrayed by their political
leaders, reduced to the alternatives of miserable wages, paltry and
uncertain benefit payments, or the outright humiliation of begging.
Germany's industries, once renowned everywhere in the world, were no
longer prosperous, despite the millions of marks in gratuities that
the financial magnates felt obliged to pour into the coffers of the
parties in power before each election in order to secure their
cooperation. For 14 years the well-blinkered conservatives and
Christian democrats of the political center had been feeding at the
trough just as greedily as their adversaries of the left…
One inevitable consequence of this ever-increasing misery and
uncertainty about the future was an abrupt decline in the birthrate.
When your household savings are wiped out, and when you fear even
greater calamities in the days ahead, you do not risk adding to the
number of your dependents.
In those days the birth rate was a reliable barometer of a country's
prosperity. A child is a joy, unless you have nothing but a crust of
bread to put in its little hand. And that's just the way it was with
hundreds of thousands of German families in 1932…
Hitler knew that he would be starting from zero. From less than zero.
But he was also confident of his strength of will to create Germany
anew -- politically, socially, financially, and economically. Now
legally and officially in power, he was sure that he could quickly
convert that cipher into a Germany more powerful than ever before.
What support did he have?
For one thing, he could count on the absolute support of millions of
fanatical disciples. And on that January evening, they joyfully shared
in the great thrill of victory. Some thirteen million Germans, many of
them former Socialists and Communists, had voted for his party.
But millions of Germans were still his adversaries, disconcerted
adversaries, to be sure, whom their own political parties had
betrayed, but who had still not been won over to National Socialism.
The two sides -- those for and those against Hitler -- were very
nearly equal in numbers. But whereas those on the left were divided
among themselves, Hitler's disciples were strongly united. And in one
thing above all, the National Socialists had an incomparable
advantage: in their convictions and in their total faith in a leader.
Their highly organized and well-disciplined party had contented with
the worst kind of obstacles, and had overcome them…
In the eyes of the capitalists, money was the sole active element in
the flourishing of a country's economy. To Hitler's way of thinking,
that conception was radically wrong: capital, on the contrary, was
only an instrument. Work was the essential element: man's endeavor,
man's honor, blood, muscles and soul.
Hitler wanted not just to put an to the class struggle, but to
reestablish the priority of the human being, in justice and respect,
as the principal factor in production…
For the worker's trust in the fatherland to be restored, he had to
feel that from now on he was to be (and to be treated) as an equal,
instead of remaining a social inferior. Under the governments of the
so-called democratic parties of both the left and the right, he had
remained an inferior; for none of them had understood that in the
hierarchy of national values, work is the very essence of life; …
The objective, then, was far greater than merely getting six million
unemployed back to work. It was to achieve a total revolution.
"The people," Hitler declared, "were not put here on earth for the
sake of the economy, and the economy doesn't exist for the sake of
capital. On the contrary, capital is meant to serve the economy, and
the economy in turn to serve the people."
It would not be enough merely to reopen the thousands of closed
factories and fill them with workers. If the old concepts still ruled,
the workers would once again be nothing more than living machines,
faceless and interchangeable…
Nowhere in twentieth-century Europe had the authority of a head of
state ever been based on such overwhelming and freely given national
consent. Prior to Hitler, from 1919 to 1932, those governments piously
styling themselves democratic had usually come to power by meager
majorities, sometimes as low as 51 or 52 percent.
"I am not a dictator," Hitler had often affirmed, "and I never will
be. Democracy will be rigorously enforced by National Socialism."
Authority does not mean tyranny. A tyrant is someone who puts himself
in power without the will of the people or against the will of the
people. A democrat is placed in power by the people. But democracy is
not limited to a single formula. It may be partisan or parliamentary.
Or it may be authoritarian. The important thing is that the people
have wished it, chosen it, established it in its given form.
That was the case with Hitler. He came to power in an essentially
democratic way. Whether one likes it or not, this fact is undeniable.
And after coming to power, his popular support measurably increased
from year to year. The more intelligent and honest of his enemies have
been obliged to admit this, men such as the declared anti-Nazi
historian and professor Joachim Fest, who wrote:
For Hitler was never interested in establishing a mere tyranny. Sheer
greed for power will not suffice as explanation for his personality
and energy -- He was not born to be a mere tyrant. He was fixated upon
his mission of defending Europe and the Aryan race ... Never had he
felt so dependent upon the masses as he did at this time, and he
watched their reactions with anxious concern.
These lines weren't written by Dr. Goebbels, but by a stern critic of
Hitler and his career…
When it came time to vote, Hitler was granted plenary powers with a
sweeping majority of 441 votes to 94: he had won not just two thirds,
but 82.44 percent of the assembly's votes. This "Enabling Act" granted
Hitler for four years virtually absolute authority over the
legislative as well as the executive affairs of the government…
After 1945 the explanation that was routinely offered for all this was
that the Germans had lost their heads. Whatever the case, it is a
historical fact that they acted of their own free will. Far from being
resigned, they were enthusiastic. "For the first time since the last
days of the monarchy," historian Joachim Fest has conceded, "the
majority of the Germans now had the feeling that they could identify
with the state."…
"You talk about persecution!" he thundered in an impromptu response to
an address by the Social Democratic speaker. "I think that there are
only a few of us [in our party] here who did not have to suffer
persecutions in prison from your side ... You seem to have totally
forgotten that for years our shirts were ripped off our backs because
you did not like the color . . . We have outgrown your persecutions!"
"In those days," he scathingly continued, "our newspapers were banned
and banned and again banned, our meetings were forbidden, and we were
forbidden to speak, I was forbidden to speak, for years on. And now
you say that criticism is salutary!"…
Hitler's millions of followers had rediscovered the primal strength of
rough, uncitified man, of a time when men still had backbone…
Gustav Noske, the lumberjack who became defense minister - and the
most valiant defender of the embattled republic in the tumultuous
months immediately following the collapse of 1918 - acknowledged
honestly in 1944, when the Third Reich was already rapidly breaking
down, that the great majority of the German people still remained true
to Hitler because of the social renewal he had brought to the working
class…
Here again, well before the collapse of party-ridden Weimar Republic,
disillusion with the unions had become widespread among the working
masses. They were starving. The hundreds of Socialist and Communist
deputies stood idly by, impotent to provide any meaningful help to the
desperate proletariat.
Their leaders had no proposals to remedy, even partially, the great
distress of the people; no plans for large-scale public works, no
industrial restructuring, no search for markets abroad.
Moreover, they offered no energetic resistance to the pillaging by
foreign countries of the Reich's last financial resources: this a
consequence of the Treaty of Versailles that the German Socialists had
voted to ratify in June of 1919, and which they had never since had
the courage effectively to oppose…
In 1930, 1931 and 1932, German workers had watched the disaster grow:
the number of unemployed rose from two million to three, to four, to
five, then to six million. At the same time, unemployment benefits
fell lower and lower, finally to disappear completely. Everywhere one
saw dejection and privation: emaciated mothers, children wasting away
in sordid lodgings, and thousands of beggars in long sad lines.
The failure, or incapacity, of the leftist leaders to act, not to
mention their insensitivity, had stupefied the working class. Of what
use were such leaders with their empty heads and empty hearts -- and,
often enough, full pockets?
Well before January 30, thousands of workers had already joined up
with Hitler's dynamic formations, which were always hard at it where
they were most needed. Many joined the National Socialists when they
went on strike. Hitler, himself a former worker and a plain man like
themselves, was determined to eliminate unemployment root and branch.
He wanted not merely to defend the laborer's right to work, but to
make his calling one of honor, to insure him respect and to integrate
him fully into a living community of all the Germans, who had been
divided class against class.
In January 1933, Hitler's victorious troops were already largely
proletarian in character, including numerous hardfisted street
brawlers, many unemployed, who no longer counted economically or
socially.
Meanwhile, membership in the Marxist labor unions had fallen off
enormously: among thirteen million socialist and Communist voters in
1932, no more than five million were union members. Indifference and
discouragement had reached such levels that many members no longer
paid their union dues. Many increasingly dispirited Marxist leaders
began to wonder if perhaps the millions of deserters were the ones who
saw things clearly. Soon they wouldn't wonder any longer.
Even before Hitler won Reichstag backing for his "Enabling Act,"
Germany's giant labor union federation, the ADGB, had begun to rally
to the National Socialist cause. As historian Joachim Fest
acknowledged: "On March 20, the labor federation's executive committee
addressed a kind of declaration of loyalty to Hitler." (J. Fest,
Hitler, p. 413.)
Hitler than took a bold and clever step. The unions had always
clamored to have the First of May recognized as a worker's holiday,
but the Weimar Republic had never acceded to their request. Hitler,
never missing an opportunity, grasped this one with both hands. He did
more than grant this reasonable demand: he proclaimed the First of May
a national holiday…
I myself attended the memorable meeting at the Tempelhof field in
1933. By nine o'clock that morning, giant columns, some of workers,
others of youth groups, marching in cadence down the pavement of
Berlin's great avenues, had started off towards the airfield to which
Hitler had called together all Germans. All Germany would follow the
rally as it was transmitted nationwide by radio…
In the dark, a group of determined opponents could easily have heckled
Hitler or otherwise sabotaged the meeting. Perhaps a third of the
onlookers had been Socialists or Communists only three months
previously. But not a single hostile voice was raised during the
entire ceremony. There was only universal acclamation.
Ceremony is the right word for it. It was an almost magical rite.
Hitler and Goebbels had no equals in the arranging of dedicatory
ceremonies of this sort. First there were popular songs, then great
Wagnerian hymns to grip the audience. Germany has a passion for
orchestral music, and Wagner taps the deepest and most secret vein of
the German soul, its romanticism, its inborn sense of the powerful and
the grand.
Meanwhile the hundreds of flags floated above the rostrum, redeemed
from the darkness by arrows of light.
Now Hitler strode to the rostrum. For those standing at the of the
field, his face must have appeared vanishingly small, but his words
flooded instantaneously across the acres of people in his audience.
A Latin audience would have preferred a voice less harsh, more
delicately expressive. But there was no doubt that Hitler spoke to the
psyche of the German people.
Germans have rarely had the good fortune to experience the enchantment
of the spoken word. In Germany, the tone has always been set by
ponderous speakers, more fond of elephantine pedantry than oratorical
passion. Hitler, as a speaker, was a prodigy, the greatest orator of
his century. He possessed, above all, what the ordinary speaker lacks:
a mysterious ability to project power.
A bit like a medium or sorcerer, he was seized, even transfixed, as he
addressed a crowd. It responded to Hitler's projection of power,
radiating it back, establishing, in the course of myriad exchanges, a
current that both orator and audience gave to and drew from equally.
One had to personally experience him speaking to understand this
phenomenon.
This special gift is what lay at the basis of Hitler's ability to win
over the masses. His high-voltage, lightning-like projection
transported and transformed all who experienced it. Tens of millions
were enlightened, riveted and inflamed by the fire of his anger,
irony, and passion.
By the time the cheering died away that May first evening, hundreds of
thousands of previously indifferent or even hostile workers who had
come to Tempelhof at the urging of their labor federation leaders were
now won over. They had become followers, like the SA stormtroopers
whom so many there that evening had brawled with in recent years.
The great human sea surged back from Tempelhof to Berlin. A million
and a half people had arrived in perfect order, and their departure
was just as orderly. No bottlenecks halted the cars and busses. For
those of us who witnessed it, this rigorous, yet joyful, discipline of
a contented people was in itself a source of wonder. Everything about
the May Day mass meeting had come off as smoothly clockwork.
The memory of that fabulous crowd thronging back to the center of
Berlin will never leave me. A great many were on foot. Their faces
were now different faces, as though they had been imbued with a
strange and totally new spirit. The non-Germans in the crowd were as
if stunned, and no less impressed than Hitler's fellow countrymen.
The French ambassador, André François-Poncet, noted:
The foreigners on the speaker's platform as guests of honor were not
alone in carrying away the impression of a truly beautiful and
wonderful public festival, an impression that was created by the
regime's genius for organization, by the night time display of
uniforms, by the play of lights, the rhythm of the music, by the flags
and the colorful fireworks; and they were not alone in thinking that a
breath of reconciliation and unity was passing over the Third Reich.
"It is our wish," Hitler had exclaimed, as though taking heaven as his
witness, "to get along together and to struggle together as brothers,
so that at the hour when we shall come before God, we might say to
him: 'See, Lord, we have changed. The German people are no longer a
people ashamed, a people mean and cowardly and divided. No, Lord! The
German people have become strong in their spirit, in their will, in
their perseverance, in their acceptance of any sacrifice. Lord, we
remain faithful to Thee! Bless our struggle!" (A. François-Poncet,
Souvenirs d'une ambassade à Berlin, p. 128.)
Who else could have made such an incantatory appeal without making
himself look ridiculous?
No politician had ever spoken of the rights of workers with such faith
and such force, or had laid out in such clear terms the social plan he
pledged to carry out on behalf of the common people.
The next day, the newspaper of the proletarian left, the "Union
Journal," reported on this mass meeting at which at least two thirds
-- a million -- of those attending were workers. "This May First was
victory day," the paper summed up.
With the workers thus won over, what further need was there for the
thousands of labor union locals that for so long had poisoned the
social life of the Reich and which, in any case, had accomplished
nothing of a lasting, positive nature?
Within hours of the conclusion of that "victory" meeting at the
Tempelhof field, the National Socialists were able to peacefully take
complete control of Germany's entire labor union organization,
including all its buildings, enterprises and banks. An era of Marxist
obstruction abruptly came to an end : from now on, a single national
organization would embody the collective will and interests of all of
Germany's workers.
Although he was now well on his way to creating what he pledged would
be a true "government of the people," Hitler also realized that great
obstacles remained. For one thing, the Communist rulers in Moscow had
not dropped their guard -- or their guns. Restoring the nation would
take more than words and promises, it would take solid achievements.
Only then would the enthusiasm shown by the working class at the May
First mass meeting be an expression of lasting victory.
How could Hitler solve the great problem that had defied solution by
everyone else (both in Germany and abroad): putting millions of
unemployed back to work?
What would Hitler do about wages? Working hours? Leisure time?
Housing? How would he succeed in winning, at long last, respect for
the rights and dignity of the worker?
How could men's lives be improved -- materially, morally, and, one
might even say, spiritually? How would he proceed to build a new
society fit for human beings, free of the inertia, injustices and
prejudices of the past?
"National Socialism," Hitler had declared at the outset, "has its
mission and its hour; it is not just a passing movement but a phase of
history."
The instruments of real power now in his hands -- an authoritarian
state, its provinces subordinate but nonetheless organic parts of the
national whole -- Hitler had acted quickly to shake himself free of
the last constraints of the impotent sectarian political parties.
Moreover, he was now able to direct a cohesive labor force that was no
longer split into a thousand rivulets but flowed as a single, mighty
current.
Hitler was self-confident, sure of the power of his own conviction. He
had no intention, or need, to resort to the use of physical force.
Instead, he intended to win over, one by one, the millions of Germans
who were still his adversaries, and even those who still hated him.
His conquest of Germany had taken years of careful planning and hard
work. Similarly, he would now realize his carefully worked out plans
for transforming the state and society. This meant not merely changes
in administrative or governmental structures, but far-reaching social
programs.
He had once vowed: "The hour will come when the 15 million people who
now hate us will be solidly behind us and will acclaim with us the new
revival we shall create together." Eventually he would succeed in
winning over even many of his most refractory skeptics and
adversaries.
His army of converts was already forming ranks. In a remarkable
tribute, historian Joachim Fest felt obliged to acknowledge
unequivocally:
Hitler had moved rapidly from the status of a demagogue to that of a
respected statesman. The craving to join the ranks of the victors was
spreading like an epidemic, and the shrunken minority of those who
resisted the urge were being visibly pushed into isolation -- The past
was dead. The future, it seemed, belonged to the regime, which had
more and more followers, which was being hailed everywhere and
suddenly had sound reasons on its side.
And even the prominent leftist writer Kurt Tucholsky, sensing the
direction of the inexorable tide that was sweeping Germany, vividly
commented: "You don't go railing against the ocean." (J. Fest, Hitler,
pp. 415 f.)
"Our power," Hitler was now able to declare, "no longer belongs to any
territorial fraction of the Reich, nor to any single class of the
nation, but to the people in its totality."
Much still remained to be done, however. So far, Hitler had succeeded
in clearing the way of obstacles to his program. Now the time to build
had arrived.
So many others had failed to tackle the many daunting problems that
were now his responsibility. Above all, the nation demanded a solution
to the great problem of unemployment. Could Hitler now succeed where
others had so dismally failed?…
Unemployment could be combated and eliminated only by giving industry
the financial means to start up anew, to modernize, thus creating
millions of new jobs.
The normal rate of consumption would not be restored, let alone
increased, unless one first raised the starvation-level allowances
that were making purchases of any kind a virtual impossibility. On the
contrary, production and sales would have to be restored before the
six million unemployed could once again become purchasers.
The great economic depression could be overcome only by restimulating
industry, by bringing industry into step with the times, and by
promoting the development of new products…
Nearly ten years earlier, while in his prison cell, Hitler had already
envisioned a formidable system of national highways. He had also
conceived of a small, easily affordable automobile (later known as the
"Volkswagen"), and had even suggested its outline. It should have the
shape of a June bug, he proposed. Nature itself suggested the car's
aerodynamic line.
Until Hitler came to power, a car was the privilege of the rich. It
was not financially within the reach of the middle class, much less of
the worker. The "Volkswagen," costing one-tenth as much as the
standard automobile of earlier years, would eventually become a
popular work vehicle and a source of pleasure after work: a way to
unwind and get some fresh air, and of discovering, thanks to the new
Autobahn highway network, a magnificent country that then, in its
totality, was virtually unknown to the German worker.
From the beginning, Hitler wanted this economical new car to be built
for the millions. The production works would also become one of
Germany's most important industrial centers and employers.
During his imprisonment, Hitler had also drawn up plans for the
construction of popular housing developments and majestic public
buildings.
Some of Hitler's rough sketches still survive. They include groups of
individual worker's houses with their own gardens (which were to be
built in the hundreds of thousands), a plan for a covered stadium in
Berlin, and a vast congress hall, unlike any other in the world, that
would symbolize the grandeur of the National Socialist revolution.
"A building with a monumental dome," historian Werner Maser has
explained, "the plan of which he drew while he was writing Mein Kampf,
would have a span of 46 meters, a height of 220 meters, a diameter of
250 meters, and a capacity of 150 to 190 thousand people standing. The
interior of the building would have been 17 times larger than Saint
Peter's Cathedral in Rome." (W. Maser, Hitler, Adolf, p. 100.)
"That hall," architect Albert Speer has pointed out, "was not just an
idle dream impossible of achievement."
Hitler's imagination, therefore, had long been teeming with a number
of ambitious projects, many of which would eventually be realized.
Fortunately, the needed entrepreneurs, managers and technicians were
on hand. Hitler would not have to improvise.
Historian Werner Maser, although quite anti-Hitler -- like nearly all
of his colleagues (how else would they have found publishers?) - has
acknowledged: "From the beginning of his political career, he [Hitler]
took great pains systematically to arrange for whatever he was going
to need in order to carry out his plans."
"Hitler was distinguished," Maser has also noted, "by an exceptional
intelligence in technical matters." Hitler had acquired his knowledge
by devoting many thousands of hours to technical studies from the time
of his youth.
"Hitler read an endless number of books," explained Dr. Schacht. "He
acquired a very considerable amount of knowledge and made masterful
use of it in discussions and speeches. In certain respects he was a
man endowed with genius. He had ideas that no one else would ever have
thought of, ideas that resulted in the ending of great difficulties,
sometimes by measures of an astonishing simplicity or brutality."
Many billions of marks would be needed to begin the great
socioeconomic revolution that was destined, as Hitler had always
intended, to make Germany once again the European leader in industry
and commerce and, most urgently, to rapidly wipe out unemployment in
Germany. Where would the money be found? And, once obtained, how would
these funds be allotted to ensure maximum effectiveness in their
investment?
Hitler was by no means a dictator in matters of the economy. He was,
rather, a stimulator. His government would undertake to do only that
which private initiative could not.
Hitler believed in the importance of individual creative imagination
and dynamism, in the need for every person of superior ability and
skill to assume responsibility.
He also recognized the importance of the profit motive. Deprived of
the prospect of having his efforts rewarded, the person of ability
often refrains from running risks. The economic failure of Communism
has demonstrated this. In the absence of personal incentives and the
opportunity for real individual initiative, the Soviet "command
economy" lagged in all but a few fields, its industry years behind its
competitors.
State monopoly tolls the death of all initiative, and hence of all
progress.
For all men selflessly to pool their wealth might be marvelous, but it
is also contrary to human nature. Nearly every man desires that his
labor shall improve his own condition and that of his family, and
feels that his brain, creative imagination, and persistence well
deserve their reward.
Because it disregarded these basic psychological truths, Soviet
Communism, right to the end, wallowed in economic mediocrity, in spite
of its immense reservoir of manpower, its technical expertise, and its
abundant natural resources, all of which ought to have made it an
industrial and technological giant.
Hitler was always adverse to the idea of state management of the
economy. He believed in elites. "A single idea of genius," he used to
say, "has more value than a lifetime of conscientious labor in an
office."
Just as there are political or intellectual elites, so also is there
an industrial elite. A manufacturer of great ability should not be
restrained, hunted down by the internal revenue services like a
criminal, or be unappreciated by the public. On the contrary, it is
important for economic development that the industrialist be
encouraged morally and materially, as much as possible.
The most fruitful initiatives Hitler would take from 1933 on would be
on behalf of private enterprise. He would keep an eye on the quality
of their directors, to be sure, and would shunt aside incompetents,
quite a few of them at times, but he also supported the best ones,
those with the keenest minds, the most imaginative and bold, even if
their political opinions did not always agree with his own.
"There is no question," he stated very firmly, "of dismissing a
factory owner or director under the pretext that he is not a National
Socialist."
Hitler would exercise the same moderation, the same pragmatism, in the
administrative as well as in the industrial sphere.
What he demanded of his co-workers, above all, was competence and
effectiveness. The great majority of Third Reich functionaries - some
80 percent -- were never enrolled in the National Socialist party.
Several of Hitler's ministers, like Konstantin von Neurath and
Schwerin von Krosigk, and ambassadors to such key posts as Prague,
Vienna and Ankara, were not members of the party. But they were
capable…
"Herr Schacht," he said, "we are assuredly in agreement on one point:
no other single task facing the government at the moment can be so
truly urgent as conquering unemployment. That will take a lot of
money. Do you see any possibility of finding it apart from the
Reichsbank?" And after a moment, he added: "How much would it take? Do
you have any idea?"
Wishing to win Schacht over by appealing to his ambition, Hitler
smiled and then asked: "Would you be willing to once again assume
presidency of the Reichsbank?" Schacht let on that he had a
sentimental concern for Dr. Luther, and did not want to hurt the
incumbent's feelings. Playing along, Hitler reassured Schacht that he
would find an appropriate new job elsewhere for Luther.
Schacht then pricked up his ears, drew himself up, and focused his big
round eyes on Hitler: "Well, if that's the way it is," he said, "then
I am ready to assume the presidency of the Reichsbank again."
His great dream was being realized. Schacht had been president of the
Reichsbank between 1923 and 1930, but had been dismissed. Now he would
return in triumph. He felt vindicated. Within weeks, the ingenious
solution to Germany's pressing financial woes would burst forth from
his inventive brain.
"It was necessary," Schacht later explained, "to discover a method
that would avoid inflating the investment holdings of the Reichsbank
immoderately and consequently increasing the circulation of money
excessively."
"Therefore," he went on, "I had to find some means of getting the sums
that were lying idle in pockets and banks, without meaning for it to
be long term and without having it undergo the risk of depreciation.
That was the reasoning behind the Mefo bonds."
What were these "Mefo" bonds? Mefo was a contraction of the
Metallurgische Forschungs-GmbH (Metallurgic Research Company). With a
startup capitalization of one billion marks - which Hitler and Schacht
arranged to be provided by the four giant firms of Krupp, Siemens,
Deutsche Werke and Rheinmetall -- this company would eventually
promote many billions of marks worth of investment.
Enterprises, old and new, that filled government orders had only to
draw drafts on Mefo for the amounts due. These drafts, when presented
to the Reichsbank, were immediately convertible into cash. The success
of the Mefo program depended entirely on public acceptance of the Mefo
bonds. But the wily Schacht had planned well. Since Mefo bonds were
short-term bonds that could be cashed in at any time, there was no
real risk in buying, accepting or holding them. They bore an interest
of four percent -- a quite acceptable figure in those days -- whereas
banknotes hidden under the mattress earned nothing. The public quickly
took all this into consideration and eagerly accepted the bonds.
While the Reichsbank was able to offer from its own treasury a
relatively insignificant 150 million marks for Hitler's war on
unemployment, in just four years the German public subscribed more
than 12 billion marks worth of Mefo bonds!
These billions, the fruit of the combined imagination, ingenuity and
astuteness of Hitler and Schacht, swept away the temporizing and
fearful conservatism of the bankers. Over the next four years, this
enormous credit reserve would make miracles possible.
Soon after the initial billion-mark credit, Schacht added another
credit of 600 million in order to finance the start of Hitler's grand
program for highway construction. This Autobahn program provided
immediate work for 100,000 of the unemployed, and eventually assured
wages for some 500,000 workers.
As large as this outlay was, it was immediately offset by a
corresponding cutback in government unemployment benefits, and by the
additional tax revenue generated as a result of the increase in living
standard (sping) of the newly employed.
Within a few months, thanks to the credit created by the Mefo bonds,
private industry once again dared to assume risks and expand. Germans
returned to work by the hundreds of thousands.
Was Schacht solely responsible for this extraordinary turnaround?
After the war, he answered for himself as a Nuremberg Tribunal
defendant, where he was charged with having made possible the Reich's
economic revival:
I don't think Hitler was reduced to begging for my help. If I had not
served him, he would have found other methods, other means. He was not
a man to give up. It's easy enough for you to say, Mr. Prosecutor,
that I should have watched Hitler die and not lifted a finger. But the
entire working class would have died with him!
Even Marxists recognized Hitler's success, and their own failure. In
the June 1934 issue of the Zeitschrift für Sozialismus, the journal of
the German Social Democrats in exile, this acknowledgement appears:
Faced with the despair of proletarians reduced to joblessness, of
young people with diplomas and no future, of the middle classes of
merchants and artisans condemned to bankruptcy, and of farmers
terribly threatened by the collapse in agricultural prices, we all
failed. We weren't capable of offering the masses anything but
speeches about the glory of socialism.
VI. The Social Revolution
Hitler's tremendous social achievement in putting Germany's six
million unemployed back to work is seldom acknowledged today. Although
it was much more than a transitory achievement, "democratic"
historians routinely dismiss it in just a few lines. Since 1945, not a
single objective scholarly study has been devoted to this highly
significant, indeed unprecedented, historical phenomenon.
Similarly neglected is the body of sweeping reforms that dramatically
changed the condition of the worker in Germany. Factories were
transformed from gloomy caverns to spacious and healthy work centers,
with natural lighting, surrounded by gardens and playing fields.
Hundreds of thousands of attractive houses were built for working
class families. A policy of several weeks of paid vacation was
introduced, along with week and holiday trips by land and sea. A
wide-ranging program of physical and cultural education for young
workers was established, with the world's best system of technical
training. The Third Reich's social security and workers' health
insurance system was the world's most modern and complete.
This remarkable record of social achievement is routinely hushed up
today because it is embarrasses those who uphold the orthodox view of
the Third Reich. Otherwise, readers might begin to think that perhaps
Hitler was the greatest social builder of the twentieth century…
Nevertheless, restoring work and bread to millions of unemployed who
had been living in misery for years; restructuring industrial life;
conceiving and establishing an organization for the effective defense
and betterment of the nation's millions of wage earners; creating a
new bureaucracy and judicial system that guaranteed the civic rights
of each member of the national community, while simultaneously holding
each person to his or her responsibilities as a German citizen: this
organic body of reforms was part of a single, comprehensive plan,
which Hitler had conceived and worked out years earlier.
Without this plan, the nation would have collapsed into anarchy.
All-encompassing, this program included broad industrial recovery as
well as detailed attention to even construction of comfortable inns
along the new highway network.
It took several years for a stable social structure to emerge from the
French Revolution. The Soviets needed even more time: five years after
the Bolshevik revolution of 1917, hundreds of thousands of Russians
were still dying of hunger and disease. In Germany, by contrast, the
great machinery was in motion within months, with organization and
accomplishment quickly meshing together…
Hitler personally dug the first spadeful of earth for the first
Autobahn highway, linking Frankfurt-am-Main with Darmstadt. For the
occasion, he brought along Dr. Schacht, the man whose visionary credit
wizardry had made the project possible. The official procession moved
ahead, three cars abreast in front, then six across, spanning the
entire width of the autobahn…
Hitler's plan to build thousands of low-cost homes also demanded a
vast mobilization of manpower. He had envisioned housing that would be
attractive, cozy, and affordable for millions of ordinary German
working-class families. He had no intention of continuing to tolerate,
as his predecessors had, cramped, ugly "rabbit warren" housing for the
German people. The great barracks-like housing projects on the
outskirts of factory towns, packed with cramped families, disgusted
him.
The greater part of the houses he would build were single story,
detached dwellings, with small yards where children could romp, wives
could grow vegetable and flower gardens, while the bread-winners could
read their newspapers in peace after the day's work. These
single-family homes were built to conform to the architectural styles
of the various German regions, retaining as much as possible the
charming local variants.
Wherever there was no practical alternative to building large
apartment complexes, Hitler saw to it that the individual apartments
were spacious, airy and enhanced by surrounding lawns and gardens
where the children could play safely.
The new housing was, of course, built in conformity with the highest
standards of public health, a consideration notoriously neglected in
previous working-class projects.
Generous loans, amortizable in ten years, were granted to newly
married couples so they could buy their own homes. At the birth of
each child, a fourth of the debt was cancelled. Four children, at the
normal rate of a new arrival every two and a half years, sufficed to
cancel the entire loan debt.
Once, during a conversation with Hitler, I expressed my astonishment
at this policy. "But then, you never get back the total amount of your
loans?," I asked. "How so?" he replied, smiling. "Over a period of ten
years, a family with four children brings in much more than our loans,
through the taxes levied on a hundred different items of consumption."
As it happened, tax revenues increased every year, in proportion to
the rise in expenditures for Hitler's social programs. In just a few
years, revenue from taxes tripled. Hitler's Germany never experienced
a financial crisis.
To stimulate the moribund economy demanded the nerve, which Hitler
had, to invest money that the government didn't yet have, rather than
passively waiting -- in accordance with "sound" financial principles
-- for the economy to revive by itself.
Today, our whole era is dying economically because we have succumbed
to fearful hesitation. Enrichment follows investment, not the other
way around…
Even before the year 1933 had ended, Hitler had succeeded in building
202,119 housing units. Within four years he would provide the German
people with nearly a million and a half (1,458,128) new dwellings!
Moreover, workers would no longer be exploited as they had been. A
month's rent for a worker could not exceed 26 marks, or about an
eighth of the average wage then. Employees with more substantial
salaries paid monthly rents of up to 45 marks maximum.
Equally effective social measures were taken in behalf of farmers, who
had the lowest incomes. In 1933 alone 17,611 new farm houses were
built, each of them surrounded by a parcel of land one thousand square
meters in size. Within three years, Hitler would build 91,000 such
farmhouses…
Everywhere industry was hiring again, with some firms -- like Krupp,
IG Farben and the large automobile manufacturers -- taking on new
workers on a very large scale. As the country became more prosperous,
car sales increased by more than 80,000 units in 1933 alone.
Employment in the auto industry doubled. Germany was gearing up for
full production, with private industry leading the way.
The new government lavished every assistance on the private sector,
the chief factor in employment as well as production. Hitler almost
immediately made available 500 million marks in credits to private
business.
This start-up assistance given to German industry would repay itself
many times over. Soon enough, another two billion marks would be
loaned to the most enterprising companies. Nearly half would go into
new wages and salaries, saving the treasury an estimated three hundred
million marks in unemployment benefits. Added to the hundreds of
millions in tax receipts spurred by the business recovery, the state
quickly recovered its investment, and more.
Hitler's entire economic policy would be based on the following
equation: risk large sums to undertake great public works and to spur
the renewal and modernization of industry, then later recover the
billions invested through invisible and painless tax revenues. It
didn't take long for Germany to see the results of Hitler's recovery
formula.
Economic recovery, as important as it was, nevertheless wasn't
Hitler's only objective. As he strived to restore full employment,
Hitler never lost sight of his goal of creating a organization
powerful enough to stand up to capitalist owners and managers, who had
shown little concern for the health and welfare of the entire national
community.
Hitler would impose on everyone -- powerful boss and lowly wage earner
alike -- his own concept of the organic social community. Only the
loyal collaboration of everyone could assure the prosperity of all
classes and social groups.
Consistent with their doctrine, Germany's Marxist leaders had set
class against class, helping to bring the country to the brink of
economic collapse. Deserting their Marxist unions and political
parties in droves, most workers had come to realize that strikes and
grievances their leaders incited only crippled production, and thus
the workers as well.
By the of 1932, in any case, the discredited labor unions were
drowning in massive debt that realistically could never be repaid.
Some of the less scrupulous union officials, sensing the oncoming
catastrophe, had begun stealing hundreds of thousands of marks from
the workers they represented. The Marxist leaders had failed:
socially, financially and morally.
Every joint human activity requires a leader. The head of a factory or
business is also the person naturally responsible for it. He oversees
every aspect of production and work. In Hitler's Germany, the head of
a business had to be both a capable director and a person concerned
for the social justice and welfare of his employees. Under Hitler,
many owners and managers who had proven to be unjust, incompetent or
recalcitrant lost their jobs, or their businesses.
A considerable number of legal guarantees protected the worker against
any abuse of authority at the workplace. Their purpose was to insure
that the rights of workers were respected, and that workers were
treated as worthy collaborators, not just as animated tools. Each
industrialist was legally obliged to collaborate with worker delegates
in drafting shop regulations that were not imposed from above but
instead adapted to each business enterprise and its particular working
conditions. These regulations had to specify "the length of the
working day, the time and method of paying wages, and the safety
rules, and to be posted throughout the factory," within easy access of
both the worker whose interests might be angered and the owner or
manager whose orders might be subverted.
The thousands of different, individual versions of such regulations
served to create a healthy rivalry, with every factory group vying to
outdo the others in efficiency and justice.
One of the first reforms to benefit German workers was the
establishment of paid vacations. In France, the leftist Popular Front
government would noisily claim, in 1936, to have originated legally
mandated paid vacations -- and stingy ones at that, only one week per
year. But it was actually Hitler who first established them, in 1933
-- and they were two or three times more generous.
Under Hitler, every factory employee had the legal right to paid
vacation. Previously, paid vacations had not normally exceed four or
five days, and nearly half of the younger workers had no vacation time
at all. If anything, Hitler favored younger workers; the youngest
workers received more generous vacations. This was humane and made
sense: a young person has more need of rest and fresh air to develop
his maturing strength and vigor. Thus, they enjoyed a full 18 days of
paid vacation per year.
Today, more than half a century later, these figures have been
surpassed, but in 1933 they far exceeded European norms.
The standard vacation was twelve days. Then, from the age of 25 on, it
went up to 18 days. After ten years with the company, workers got a
still longer vacation: 21 days, or three times what the French
socialists would grant the workers of their country in 1936.
Hitler introduced the standard forty-hour work week in Europe. As for
overtime work, it was now compensated, as nowhere else in the
continent at the time, at an increased pay rate. And with the
eight-hour work day now the norm, overtime work became more readily
available.
In another innovation, work breaks were made longer: two hours each
day, allowing greater opportunity for workers to relax, and to make
use of the playing fields that large industries were now required to
provide.
Whereas a worker's right to job security had been virtually
non-existent, now an employee could no longer be dismissed at the sole
discretion of the employer. Hitler saw to it that workers' rights were
spelled out and enforced. Henceforth, an employer had to give four
weeks notice before firing an employee, who then had up to two months
to appeal the dismissal. Dismissals could also be annulled by the
"Courts of Social Honor" (Ehrengerichte).
This Court was one of three great institutions that were established
to protect German workers. The others were the "Labor Commissions" and
the "Council of Trust."
The "Council of Trust" (Vertrauensrat) was responsible for
establishing and developing a real spirit of community between
management and labor. "In every business enterprise," the 1934 "Labor
Charter" law stipulated, "the employer and head of the enterprise
(Führer), the employees and workers, personnel of the enterprise,
shall work jointly toward the goal of the enterprise and the common
good of the nation."
No longer would either be exploited by the other -- neither the worker
by arbitrary whim of the employer, nor the employer through the
blackmail of strikes for political ends.
Article 35 of the "Labor Charter" law stated: "Every member of an
enterprise community shall assume the responsibility required by his
position in said common enterprise." In short, each enterprise would
be headed by a dynamic executive, charged with a sense of the greater
community -- no longer a selfish capitalist with unconditional,
arbitrary power.
"The interest of the community may require that an incapable or
unworthy employer be relieved of his duties," the "Labor Charter"
stipulated. The employer was no longer unassailable, an all-powerful
boss with the last word on hiring and firing his staff. He, too, would
be subject to the workplace regulations, which he was now obliged to
respect no less than the least of his employees. The law conferred the
honor and responsibility of authority on the employer only insofar as
he merited it…
In the Third Reich, the worker knew that "exploitation of his physical
strength in bad faith or in violation of his honor" was no longer
tolerated. He had obligations to the community, but he shared these
obligations with every other member of the enterprise, from the chief
executive to the messenger boy. Finally, the German worker had clearly
defined social rights, which were arbitrated and enforced by
independent agencies. And while all this had been achieved in an
atmosphere of justice and moderation, it nevertheless constituted a
genuine social revolution…
Factories and shops, large and small, were altered or transformed to
conform to the strictest standards of cleanliness and hygiene:
interiors, so often dark and stifling, were opened up to light;
playing fields were constructed; rest areas where workers could unbend
during break, were set aside; employee cafeterias and respectable
locker rooms were opened. The larger industrial establishments, in
addition to providing the normally required conventional sports
facilities, were obliged to put in swimming pools!
In just three years, these achievements would reach unimagined
heights: more than two thousand factories refitted and beautified;
23,000 work premises modernized; 800 buildings designed exclusively
for meetings; 1,200 playing fields; 13,000 sanitary facilities; 17,000
cafeterias.
To assure the healthy development of the working class, physical
education courses were instituted for younger workers. Some 8,000 were
eventually organized. Technical training was equally emphasized.
Hundreds of work schools, and thousands of technical courses were
created. There were examinations for professional competence, and
competitions in which generous prizes were awarded to outstanding
masters of their craft.
Eight hundred departmental inspectors and 17,300 local inspectors were
employed to conscientiously monitor and promote these improvements.
To provide affordable vacations for German workers on a hitherto
unprecedented scale, Hitler established the "Strength through Joy"
program. As a result, hundreds of thousands of workers were now able
to make relaxing vacation trips on land and sea each summer.
Magnificent cruise ships were built, and special trains brought
vacationers to the mountains and the seashore. In just a few years,
Germany's working-class tourists would log a distance equivalent to 54
times the circumference of the earth! And thanks to generous state
subsidies, the cost to workers of these popular vacation excursions
was nearly insignificant…
Was Hitler's transformation of the lot of the working class
authoritarian? Without a doubt. And yet, for a people that had grown
sick and tired of anarchy, this new authoritarianism wasn't regarded
as an imposition. In fact, people have always accepted a strong man's
leadership.
In any case, there is no doubt that the attitude of the German working
class, which was still two-thirds non-Nazi at the start of 1933, soon
changed completely. As Belgian author Marcel Laloire noted at the
time:
When you make your way through the cities of Germany and go into the
working-class districts, go through the factories, the construction
yards, you are astonished to find so many workers on the job sporting
the Hitler insignia, to see so many flags with the swastika, black on
a bright red background, in the most densely populated districts.
Hitler's "German Labor Front" (Deutsche Arbeitsfront), which
incorporated all workers and employers, was for the most part eagerly
accepted. The steel spades of the sturdy young lads of the "National
Labor Service" (Reichsarbeitsdienst) could also be seen gleaming along
the highways.
Hitler created the National Labor Service not only to alleviate
unemployment, but to bring together, in absolute equality, and in the
same uniform, both the sons of millionaires and the sons of the
poorest families for several months' common labor and living.
All performed the same work, all were subject to the same discipline;
they enjoyed the same pleasures and benefited from the same physical
and moral development. At the same construction sites and in the same
barracks, Germans became conscious of what they had in common, grew to
understand one another, and discarded their old prejudices of class
and caste.
After a hitch in the National Labor Service, a young worker knew that
the rich man's son was not a pampered monster, while the young lad of
wealthy family knew that the worker's son had no less honor than a
nobleman or an heir to riches; they had lived and worked together as
comrades. Social hatred was vanishing, and a socially united people
was being born.
Hitler could go into factories -- something few men of the so-called
Right would have risked in the past -- and hold forth to crowds of
workers, at times in the thousands, as at the huge Siemens works. "In
contrast to the von Papens and other country gentlemen," he might tell
them, "in my youth I was a worker like you. And in my heart of hearts,
I have remained what I was then."
During his twelve years in power, no untoward incident ever occurred
at any factory he visited. Hitler was at home when he went among the
people, and he was received like a member of the family returning home
after making a success of himself.
But the Chancellor of the Third Reich wanted more than popular
approval. He wanted that approval to be freely, widely, and repeatedly
expressed by popular vote. No people was ever be more frequently asked
for their electoral opinion than the German people of that era -- five
times in five years.
For Hitler, it was not enough that the people voted from time to time,
as in the previous democratic system. In those days, voters were
rarely appealed to, and when they expressed an opinion, they were
often ill-informed and apathetic. After an election, years might go
by, during which the politicians were heedless and inaccessible, the
electorate powerless to vote on their actions.
To enable the German public to express its opinion on the occasion of
important events of social, national, or international significance,
Hitler provided the people a new means of approving or rejecting his
own actions as Chancellor: the plebiscite.
Hitler recognized the right of all the people, men and women alike, to
vote by secret ballot: to voice their opinion of his policies, or to
make a well-grounded judgment on this or that great decision in
domestic or foreign affairs. Rather than a formalistic routine,
democracy became a vital, active program of supervision that was
renewed annually.
The articles of the "Plebiscite Law" were brief and clear:
1. The Reich government may ask the people whether or not it
approves of a measure planned by or taken by the government. This may
also apply to a law.
2. A measure submitted to plebiscite will be considered as
established when it receives a simple majority of the votes. This will
apply as well to a law modifying the Constitution.
3. If the people approves the measure in question, it will be
applied in conformity with article III of the Law for Overcoming the
Distress of the People and the Reich.
The Reich Interior Ministry is authorized to take all legal and
administrative measures necessary to carry out this law.
Berlin, July 14, 1933.
Hitler, Frick…
From the first months of 1933, his accomplishments were public fact,
for all to see. Before end of the year, unemployment in Germany had
fallen from more than 6,000,000 to 3,374,000. Thus, 2,627,000 jobs had
been created since the previous February, when Hitler began his
"gigantic task!" A simple question: Who in Europe ever achieved
similar results in so short a time?…
In his detailed and critical biography of Hitler, Joachim Fest limited
his treatment of Hitler's extraordinary social achievements in 1933 to
a few paragraphs. All the same, Fest did not refrain from
acknowledging:
The regime insisted that it was not the rule of one social class above
all others, and by granting everyone opportunities to rise, it in fact
demonstrated class neutrality -- These measures did indeed break
through the old, petrified social structures. They tangibly improved
the material condition of much of the population. (J. Fest, Hitler,
pp. 434-435.)
Not without reason were the swastika banners waving proudly throughout
the working-class districts where, just a year ago, they had been
unceremoniously torn down.
Post by R***@hotmail.com
But they did murder 6 million people, and their stated objective was to
murder every last Jew.
"There was a written order for the invasion
of the Soviet Union, a long and detailed order signed by Hitler
himself. It was labeled Directive 21--Operation Barbarossa. And there
were more directives as the war in Russia was raging. There was one
concerning the battle of Stalingrad. Hitler was fond of issuing
detailed orders to his armies, extending into both strategic and
tactical matters. You can find an English translation of Directive 21
at: http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/1084/hitler_directives/dir21.htm

Now it's your turn. Show us one, just one, written order or
directive by Hitler relating to the murder of Jews. It doesn't have
to be detailed, just clear and unambiguous. Let's make it easier for
you. Just show us one, just one, order signed by anyone, of any rank,
in any position of authority, whether military or civilian, ordering
the gassing of Jews at any time, at any place, at any concentration
camp, in any country.

That should be pretty easy if indeed there was a Holocaust--if
indeed the Germans really did kill Jews by the hundreds of thousands.
Such a monstrous and wide-reaching program of mass murder simply could
not have been carried out without some written directions, without
some official orders passed down through the ranks, with multiple
copies to headquarters, without some reports passed back up the ranks
that the terrible orders had been successfully carried out. That's
the way military and civilian bureaucracies work--paper, paper,
paper--and the Germans were known to be meticulous record keepers. So
where, oh where, are all those documents on the ghastly gassings at
Auschwitz, Treblinka, Chelmno, Sobibor, Belzec, Mauthausen, and other
fabled "death camps?"

Morghus

Newsweek magazine May 15, 1989 says on page 64:

"the way the Nazis did things: the secrecy, the unwritten orders, the
destruction of records and the innocent-sounding code names for the
extermination of the Jews. Perhaps it was inevitable that historians
would quarrel over just what happened"

The real reason there are no records of an extermination plan is
because there was no extermination plan. The Germans planned to deport
the Jews out of Germany. The records show that they planned to move
them to Madagascar.
Post by R***@hotmail.com
I have known many, many WW2 vets, and not a single one of them would
agree with your denials. You are full of shit. Quit blaming Jews for
your problems and get yourself unfucked.
by Theodore J. O'Keefe

Nothing has been more effective in establishing the authenticity of
the Holocaust story in the minds of Americans than the terrible scenes
US troops discovered when they entered German concentration camps at
the close of World War II.

At Dachau, Buchenwald, Dora, Mauthausen, and other work and detention
camps, horrified US infantrymen encountered heaps of dead and dying
inmates, emaciated and diseased. Survivors told them hair-raising
stories of torture and slaughter, and backed up their claims by
showing the GIs crematory ovens, alleged execution gas chambers,
supposed implements of torture, and even shrunken heads and
lampshades, gloves, and handbags purportedly made from skin flayed
from dead inmates.

US government authorities, mindful that many Americans who remembered
the atrocity stories fed them during World War I still doubted the
Allied propaganda directed against the Hitler regime, resolved to
"document" what the GIs had found in the camps. Prominent newsmen
and politicians were flown in to see the harrowing evidence, while
the US Army Signal Corps filmed and photographed the scenes for
posterity. Famous journalist Edward R. Murrow reported, in tones of
horror, but no longer of disbelief, what he had been told and shown,
and Dachau and
Buchenwald were branded on the hearts and minds of the American
populace as names of infamy unmatched in the sad and bloody history
of this planet.

For Americans, what was "discovered" at the camps -- the dead and the
diseased, the terrible stories of the inmates, all the props of
torture and terror -- became the basis not simply of a transitory
propaganda campaign but of the conviction that, yes, it was true: the
Germans did exterminate six million Jews, most of them in lethal gas
chambers.

What the GIs found was used, by way of films that were mandatory
viewing for the vanquished populace of Germany, to "re-educate" the
German people by destroying their national pride and their will to a
united, independent national state, imposing in their place
overwhelming feelings of collective guilt and political impotence.
And when the testimony, and the verdict, of the Nuremberg Tribunal
incorporated most, if not all, of the horror stories Americans were
told about
Dachau, Buchenwald, and other places captured by the US Army, the
Holocaust could pass for one of the most documented, one of the most
authenticated, one of the most proven historical episodes in the
human record.

A Different Reality

But it is known today that, very soon after the liberation of the
camps, American authorities were aware that the real story of the
camps was quite different from the one in which they were coaching
military public information officers, government spokesmen,
politicians, journalists, and other mouthpieces.

When American and British forces overran western and central Germany
in the spring of 1945, they were followed by troops charged with
discovering and securing any evidence of German war crimes.

Among them was Dr. Charles Larson, one of America's leading forensic
pathologists, who was assigned to the US Army's Judge Advocate
General's Department. As part of a US War Crimes Investigation Team,
Dr. Larson performed autopsies at Dachau and some twenty other German
camps, examining on some days more than 100 corpses. After his grim
work at Dachau, he was
questioned for three days by US Army prosecutors.

Dr. Larson's findings? In an 1980 newspaper interview he said: "What
we've heard is that six million Jews were exterminated. Part of that
is a hoax." And what part was the hoax? Dr. Larson, who told his
biographer that to his knowledge he "was the only forensic pathologist
on duty in the entire European Theater" of Allied military operations,
confirmed that "never was a case of poison gas uncovered."

Typhus, Not Poison Gas

If not by gassing, how did the unfortunate victims at Dachau,
Buchenwald and Bergen-Belsen perish? Were they tortured to death or
deliberately starved? The answers to these questions are known as
well.

As Dr. Larson and other Allied medical men discovered, the chief
cause of death at Dachau, Belsen and the other camps was disease,
above all typhus, an old and terrible scourge of mankind that until
recently flourished in places where populations were crowded together
in circumstances where public health measures were unknown or had
broken down. Such was the case in the overcrowded internment camps in
Germany at war's end, where, despite such measures as systematic
delousing, quarantine of the sick and cremation of the dead, the
virtual
collapse of Germany's food, transport, and public health systems led
to catastrophe.

Perhaps the most authoritative statement of the facts as to typhus and
mortality in the camps has been made by Dr. John E. Gordon, M.D.,
Ph.D., a professor of preventive medicine and epidemiology at the
Harvard University School of Public Health, who was with US forces in
Germany in 1945. Dr. Gordon reported in 1948 that "The outbreaks in
concentration camps and prisons made up the great bulk of typhus
infection encountered in Germany." Dr. Gordon summarized the causes
for the outbreaks as follows:

Germany in the spring months of April and May [1945] was an
astounding sight, a mixture of humanity travelling this way and that,
homeless, often hungry and carrying typhus with them ...Germany was in
chaos. The destruction of whole cities and the path left by advancing
armies produced a disruption of living conditions contributing to the
spread of the disease. Sanitation was low grade, public utilities were
seriously disrupted, food supply and food distribution was poor,
housing was inadequate and order and discipline were everywhere
lacking. Still more important, a shifting of populations was occurring
such as few countries and few times have experienced.

Dr. Gordon's findings are corroborated by Dr. Russell Barton, today a
psychiatrist of international repute, who entered Bergen-Belsen with
British forces as a young medical student in 1945. Barton, who
volunteered to care for the diseased survivors, testified under sworn
oath in a Toronto courtroom in 1985 that "Thousands of prisoners who
died at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp during World War II
weren't deliberately starved to death but died from a rash of
diseases."

Dr. Barton further testified that on entering the camp he had credited
stories of deliberate starvation but decided such stories were untrue
after inspecting the well equipped kitchens and the meticulously
maintained ledgers, dating back to 1942, of food cooked and dispensed
each day.

Despite noisily publicized claims and widespread popular notions to
the contrary, no researcher has been able to document a German policy
of extermination through starvation in the German camps.

No 'Human Skin' Lampshades

What of the ghoulish stories of concentration camp inmates skinned for
their tattoos, flayed to make lampshades and handbags, or other
artifacts? What of the innumerable "torture racks," "meathooks,"
whipping posts, gallows, and other tools of torment and death that are
reported to have abounded at every German camp? These allegations, and
even more grotesque ones proffered by Soviet prosecutors, found their
way into the record at Nuremberg.

The lampshade and tattooed-skin charges were made against Ilse Koch,
dubbed by journalists the "Bitch of Buchenwald," who was reported to
have furnished her house with objects manufactured from the tanned
hides of luckless inmates.

But General Lucius Clay, military governor of the US zone of occupied
Germany, who reviewed her case in 1948, told his superiors in
Washington: "There is no convincing evidence that she [Ilse Koch]
selected inmates for extermination in order to secure tattooed skins
or that she possessed any articles made of human skin." In an
interview General Clay gave years later, he stated about the material
for the infamous lampshades: "Well, it turned out actually that it was
goat flesh. But
at the trial it was still human flesh. It was almost impossible for
her to have gotten a fair trial." Ilse Koch hanged herself in a German
jail in 1967.

It would be tedious to itemize and refute the thousands of bizarre
claims as to Nazi atrocities. That there were instances of German
cruelty, however, is clear from the testimony of Dr. Konrad Morgen, a
legal investigator attached to the Reich Criminal Police, whose
statements on the witness stand at Nuremberg have never been
challenged by proponents of the Jewish Holocaust story. Dr. Morgen
informed the court that he had been given full authority by Heinrich
Himmler,
commander of Hitler's SS and the dread Gestapo, to enter any German
concentration camp and investigate instances of cruelty and corruption
on the part of camp personnel. As he explained in sworn testimony at
Nuremberg, Dr. Morgen investigated 800 such cases, resulting in more
than 200 convictions. Punishments included the death penalty for the
worst offenders, including Hermann Florstedt, commandant of Lublin
(Majdanek), and Karl Koch (Ilse's husband), commandant of Buchenwald.

While German camp commandants in certain cases did inflict physical
punishment, such acts had to be approved by authorities in Berlin, and
it was required that a camp physician first certify the good health of
the prisoner to be disciplined, and then be on hand at the actual
beating. After all, throughout most of the war the camps were
important centers of industrial activity. The good health and morale
of the prisoners was critical to the German war effort, as is
evidenced in a January 1943 order issued by SS General Richard Glücks,
chief of the office that supervised the
concentration camps. It held the camp commanders "personally
responsible for exhausting every possibility to preserve the physical
strength of the detainees." Camp Survivors: Merely Victims?
US Army investigators, working at Buchenwald and other camps, quickly
ascertained what was common knowledge among veteran inmates: that the
worst offenders, the cruelest denizens of the camps, were not the
guards but the prisoners themselves. Common criminals of the same
stripe as those who populate US prisons today committed many
villainies, particularly when they held positions of authority, and
fanatical Communists, highly organized to combat their many
political enemies among the inmates, eliminated their foes with
Stalinist ruthlessness. Two US Army investigators at Buchenwald, Egon
W. Fleck and Edward A. Tenenbaum, carefully investigated circumstances
in the camp before its liberation. In a detailed report submitted to
their superiors, they revealed, in the words of Alfred Toombs, their
commander, who wrote a preface to the report, "how the prisoners
themselves organized a deadly terror within the Nazi terror."

Fleck and Tenenbaum described the power exercised by criminals and
Communists as follows:

The trusties, who in time became almost exclusively Communist
Germans, had the power of life and death over all other inmates. They
could sentence a man or a group to almost certain death ... The
Communist trusties were directly responsible for a large part of the
brutalities at Buchenwald.

Colonel Donald B. Robinson, chief historian of the American military
government in Germany, summarized the Fleck-Tenenbaum report in an
article published in an American magazine shortly after the war.
Colonel Robinson wrote succinctly of the American investigators'
findings: "It appeared that the prisoners who agreed with the
Communists ate; those who didn't starved to death."

Additional corroboration of inmate brutality has been provided by
Ellis E. Spackman, who, as Chief of Counter-Intelligence Arrests and
Detentions for the US Seventh Army, was involved in the liberation of
Dachau. Spackman, later a professor of history at San Bernardino
Valley College in California, wrote in 1966 that at Dachau "the
prisoners were the actual instruments that inflicted the barbarities
on their fellow prisoners."

'Gas Chambers'

In December 1944 US Army officers Colonel Paul Kirk and Lt. Colonel
Edward J. Gully inspected the German concentration camp at
Struthof-Natzweiler in Alsace. They submitted their findings to their
superiors at the headquarters of the US 6th Army Group, which
subsequently forwarded their report to the US War Crimes Division.
While, significantly, the full text of their report has never been
published, it has been revealed, by a historian supportive of
Holocaust claims, that the two investigators were careful to
characterize equipment exhibited to them by French informants as a
"so-called lethal gas chamber," and to claim it was "allegedly used as
a lethal gas chamber." (Emphasis added)

Both the careful phraseology of the Natzweiler report, and its
effective suppression, stand in stark contrast to the credulity, the
confusion, and the blaring publicity that accompanied official reports
of alleged gas chambers at Dachau. At first, a US Army photo depicting
a GI gazing at a steel door marked with a skull and crossbones and the
German words for: "Caution! Gas! Mortal danger! Don't open!," was
identified as showing the murder weapon.

Later, however, it was evidently decided that the apparatus in
question was merely a standard delousing chamber for clothing, and
another alleged gas chamber, this one cunningly disguised as a shower
room, was exhibited to American congressmen and journalists as the
site where thousands breathed their last. While there exist numerous
reports in the press as to the operation of this second "gas chamber,"
no official report by trained Army investigators has yet surfaced to
reconcile such problems as the function of the shower heads: Were they
"dummies," or did lethal cyanide gas stream through them? (Each theory
has appreciable support in journalistic and
historiographical literature.)

As with Dachau, so with Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, and the other camps
liberated by the Allies in western Germany. There was no end of
propaganda about "gas chambers," "gas ovens," and the like, but so far
not a single detailed description of the murder weapon and its
function, not a single report of the kind that is mandatory for the
successful prosecution of any assault or murder case in America at
that time and today, has come to light.

Furthermore, a number of Holocaust authorities have now publicly
decreed that there were no gassings, no extermination camps in Germany
after all. (We are now told that "gassing" and "extermination" camps
were located exclusively in what is now Poland, in areas captured by
the Soviet Red Army and made off-limits to western investigators.)

Dr. Martin Broszat of the Munich-based Institute for Contemporary
History, which is funded by the German government, stated
categorically in a 1960 letter to the German weekly Die Zeit: "Neither
in Dachau nor in Bergen-Belsen nor in Buchenwald were Jews or other
prisoners gassed." Professional "Nazi hunter" Simon Wiesenthal stated
in 1975 and again in 1993 that "there were no
extermination camps on German soil."

Dachau "gas chamber" No. 2, which was once presented to a stunned and
grieving world as a weapon that claimed hundreds of thousands of
lives, is now described in the brochure issued to tourists at the
modern Dachau "memorial site" in these words: "This gas chamber,
camouflaged as a shower room, was not used."

The Propaganda Intensifies

More than 50 years after American troops entered Dachau, Buchenwald
and other German camps, and trained American investigators established
the facts as to what had gone on in them, the government in
Washington, the entertainment media in Hollywood, and the print media
in New York continue to churn out millions of words and images
annually on the horrors of the camps and the infamy of the Holocaust.
Despite the fact that, with the exception of the defeated Confederacy,
no enemy of America has ever so suffered so complete and devastating
defeat as did Germany in 1945, the mass media and the politicians and
bureaucrats behave as if Hitler, his troops, and his concentration
camps continue to exist in an eternal present, and our opinion makers
continue to distort, through ignorance or malice, the facts about the
camps.

Time for the Truth

It is time that the government and the professional historians reveal
the facts about Dachau, Buchenwald and the other camps. It is time
they let the American public know how the inmates died, and how they
didn't die. It is time that the claims of mass murder by gassing are
clarified and investigated in the same manner as any other claims of
murder. It is time that the free ride certain groups have enjoyed as
the result of unchallenged Holocaust claims be terminated, just as it
is time to end the scapegoating of other groups, including Germans,
eastern Europeans, the
Roman Catholic hierarchy, and the wartime leadership of America and
Britain, either for their alleged role in the Holocaust or their
supposed failure to stop it.

Above all, it is time that the citizens of this great Republic have
the facts about the camps, facts they have a right to know, a right
that is fundamental to the exercise of their authority and their will
in the governance of their country. As citizens and as taxpayers,
Americans of all ethnic backgrounds, of all faiths, have a basic right
and an overriding interest in determining the facts of incidents that
are deemed by those in positions of power to be significant in
determining America's foreign and educational policy, as well as its
selection of past events to be memorialized in our
civic life.

Today the alleged facts of the Holocaust are at issue all over the
civilized world. The truth will be decided only by recourse to the
facts, in the public forum: not by concealing the facts, denying the
truth, stonewalling reality. The truth will out, and it is time the
government of this country, and governments and international bodies
throughout the world, make public the evidence of what actually
transpired in the German concentration camps in the years 1933-1945,
so that we may put paid to the lies, without fear or favor, and carry
out the work of reconciliation and renewal that is and must be the
granite foundation of mutual tolerance between peoples and of a peace
based on justice.

Summary
The conclusions of the early US Army investigations as to the truth
about the wartime German concentration camps have since been
corroborated by all subsequent investigators and can be summarized:

1.The harrowing scenes of dead and dying inmates were not the result
of a German policy of "extermination," but rather the result of
epidemics of typhus and other disease brought about largely by the
effects of Allied aerial attacks.
2.Stories of Nazi supercriminals and sadists who turned Jews and
others into handbags and lampshades for their private profit or
amusement were sick lies or diseased fantasies; indeed, the German
authorities punished corruption and cruelty on the part of camp
commanders and guards.
3.On the other hand, portrayals of the newly liberated inmates as
saints and martyrs of Hitlerism were quite often very far from the
truth; indeed, most of the brutalities inflicted on camp detainees
were the work of their fellow prisoners, in contravention of German
policy and German orders.
4.The alleged homicidal showers and gas chambers were used either for
bathing camp inmates or delousing their clothes; the claim that they
were used to murder Jews or other human beings is a contemptible
fabrication. Orthodox historians and professional "Nazi-hunters" have
quietly dropped claims that inmates were gassed at Dachau, Buchenwald
and other camps in Germany. They continue, however, to keep silent
regarding the lies about Dachau and Buchenwald, as well as to evade an
open discussion of the evidence for homicidal gassing at Auschwitz and
the
other camps captured by the Soviets.


Institute For Historical Review
Post Office Box 2739
Newport Beach, California 92659





http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
R***@hotmail.com
2006-04-04 01:35:31 UTC
Permalink
You are a fucking idiot.

This country, this society - will >never< turn against Israel. If you
cant see that, then you are a dunce. For one thing, most of them are
probably related to Jesus somehow - by blood. For another thing, they
tend to be well educated and so they can build a damn fine rocket,
missile, or nuke.

Half of the bigshots on the Manhattan project were Jews. We'd be better
off today if we'd have lost WW2 ?

You're babbling like a fucking idiot.
Alric Knebel
2006-04-04 17:32:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by R***@hotmail.com
You are a fucking idiot.
This country, this society - will >never< turn against Israel. If you
cant see that, then you are a dunce.
NOW you're getting it. Yes, he is a dunce.
Post by R***@hotmail.com
For one thing, most of them are
probably related to Jesus somehow - by blood. For another thing, they
tend to be well educated and so they can build a damn fine rocket,
missile, or nuke.
Half of the bigshots on the Manhattan project were Jews. We'd be better
off today if we'd have lost WW2 ?
Hey, hey, hey. Calm down. There's no sense in introducing facts into
this debate. His skull is impervious to them.
Post by R***@hotmail.com
You're babbling like a fucking idiot.
How dare you smear idiots that way!
--
Alric Knebel
http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com
Topaz
2006-04-06 01:27:25 UTC
Permalink
"Jews always position themselves as mediators. These
nasties hold it cardinal they accredit and interpret *everything*.
Nothing has worth or meaning until it's pronounced upon by a generous
scoop of shit in a hate hat. Nothing must be expressed save in jewish
terms. Invaders become undocumented workers. Queers become gays.
Freakins become African-Americans. Attack on Iraq becomes defense of
America. Nothing is legitimate save Big Kike stamp off on it.

BK doesn't like it when a Sheehan steps forward and foghorns facts to
fodder. Instantly, like mosquitoes at twilight, a flock of
bloodthirsty kikes appears, buzzing and sucking and whining. Have you
ever noticed that it is impossible to criticize jews and keep your
character? The jews have literally billions of enemies worldwide, yet
not a single one of them is an honest man of laudable motive. It is
impossible to carry off this charade without controlling the media
and a hell of a lot of other things too. The minute jew-criticism
appears, the ashkenazis and appeaser annies begin the smear. No one
ever opposed a loving kike except invidiously. Smear campaigns are
media control in action. There are other aspects of media control, but
day in day out, making horrible shrieks and gurgles to keep the goyish
herd away from the healthy green fields is the workaday business of
the controllers. Jews determine which issues may be debated, and in
what terms. Jews make up more than fifty percent of the experts on
both sides of these tiny debates. A few vetted goyim are allowed
through to keep up the charade of democratic discussion. The Internet
is the only medium that prevents the illusion of popular conformity
with jewthink being carried off. All that is necessary for jews to
maintain control is to create a congenial if bogus reality through
television and the main dailies, and relentlessly enforce this
orthodoxy through smear campaigns against any who breach it.

The death of a son is one of the few motives strong enough to drive
average goy fodder to breach etiquette and speak truth to kikes. She
must be shut down. How to do that? You can see the jews' uncertainty.
They attack her, at the same time, as both a lefty and a nazi.
Illogical, but in time they'll settle on an approach. Sometimes just
throwing shit and see what sticks is the best way. How dare Sheehan
value her own son more than the interests of Israel?

I say my son died for LIES. George Bush LIED to us and he knew he
was LYING.

And none of the thick rancid honkings Limbaugh and the freeper
patriotards can gainsay it. Remember that bushy came out of manly
Barbara, the wizened maw who asked why she should trouble her
"beautiful mind" about the body bags coming back from Iraq. You know -
the ones you never see, because they have to show you endless pictures
of $440,000-compensated jews being "ethnically cleansed," sniff, yet
again. Only an anti-Semite puts his own life before Israel. The jews
are the one people on earth who routinely are absolved of guilt for
that for which they and they alone are guilty. Isn't that odd?

DaX

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/

http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
Topaz
2006-04-06 01:20:58 UTC
Permalink
" . .for you suffered like things of your own countrymen as they did
from the Jews, who killed both the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and
drove us out and displease God, and oppose all men. . . But God's
wrath has come upon them at last. (1 Thessalonians 2:14-16)
Therefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith,
instead of giving heed to Jewish myths or to commands of men who
reject the truth. (Titus1:13-14)

In fact the greatest Jewish myth today is that somehow the Jewish
people who accept the anti-Christian hatred of Judaism are still
Chosen of God.

In fact, for the writing such as these, the New Testament has long
been hated and called anti-Semitic by the Jews. In Israel, there have
been public burnings of the New Testament. Zionists publicly and
ceremoniously burned hundreds of copies of the New Testament in
Jerusalem on March 23, 1980. They were destroyed under the auspices of
Yad Le'akhim, a Jewish religious organization subsidized by the
Israeli Ministry of Religions.

In Israeli government-financed schools it is illegal to even quote
from the very much hated New Testament. Is it ironic to think that
some of the Christian money that goes to Israel has helped finance the
burning of the New Testament! There are Jewish groups all over the
world that are working to actually change the New Testament and take
out the verses that offend them. Jewish pressure has already caused
changes in the famous Passion Play. Biblical versus that Jews don't
like were taken out.

The term Judeo-Christian, a term never used in the United States until
after the Second World War, (again coinciding with the rise of Jewish
power) is a completely ridiculous term, for Judaism and Christianity
are polar opposites in principle and belief. Christianity celebrates,
forgiveness and love, Judaism honors vengeance and hate. In fact,
Judaism is viciously hateful toward Jesus Christ and the Virgin Mary.
In fact the Talmud claims that the Jewish priests not the Romans
crucified Christ.

Here are some quotes from the chief Jewish religious text, the Talmud.

* Balaam [Jesus] fornicated with his jackass. (Sanhedrin 105a-b)
* Balaam [Jesus] is raised from the dead and being punished in
boiling hot semen. Those who mock the words of the Jewish sages and
sin against Israel are boiled in hot excrement. (57a Gittin)
* She who was the descendant of princes and governors [The Virgin
Mary] played the harlot with a carpenter (Sanhedrin 106a)
* [Jesus] was lowered into a pit of dung up to his armpits. Then a
hard cloth was placed within a soft one, wound round his neck, and the
two ends pulled in opposite directions until he was dead. (Sanhedrin
52b) Also, it says they gave him four different executions in
Sanhedrin 106a.

Masters of deceit, some Jews will claim that Balaam was not a derisive
name Jews used for Jesus. But, in The Jewish Encyclopedia, under the
heading "Balaam," it clearly says quote "…the pseudonym 'Balaam' given
to Jesus in Sanhedrin 106b and Gittin 57a."

It is ironic that the Muslim faith is presented as anti-Christian, yet
Moslems honor Christ and the Virgin Mary. For instance, although the
Koran views Christ as a great prophet rather than savior, it says Mary
was a virtuous woman and God had fathered her son, Jesus. It also says
that God resurrected Jesus from the dead. The Koran, like the New
Testament, suggests that the Jews had a covenant with God that they
broke and that God then offered a new covenant to all believers. It
condemns the Talmud's assertion that Mary was a whore and disputes the
Talmud's boast that Jews themselves murdered Jesus Christ rather than
the Romans at their behest. Here a couple of quotes from the Qur'an.

They (Jews) have incurred divine displeasure: in that they broke the
covenant… And little is it they believe.
That they rejected faith and they uttered against Mary a grave false
charge…
That they said (in boast) "we killed Christ Jesus, the son of Mary,
the messenger of Allah- but they killed him not, nor crucified him.
But so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are
full of doubts…
(Sura 4 AlNisa 153- 159)

It is in the interest of Jewish Supremacists to paint the Moslems as
vicious enemies of Christ, but the Qur'an states a quite mild view of
Christians as compared to Jews.

Strongest among men in enmity to the believers wilt thou find the Jews
and Pagans; and nearest among them in love to the believers wilt thou
find those who say "we are Christians": Because amongst these are men
devoted to learning and men who renounced the world, and they are not
arrogant. (Sura 5 Al-Ma'idah "5-82)

It is in the interest of Jewish Supremacists to paint the Moslems as
vicious enemies of Christ, but the Qur'an states a quite mild view of
Christians as compared to Jews. If you would like a more in depth look
into the extreme anti-Christian attitudes of Judaism please read my
book entitled Jewish Supremacism and you can go this website to My
Awakening and read the chapter on Christianity, Judaism and Race.
There is a wealth of information in these books and invite you check
out my sources for yourself. Shocking as they may be, you will find
them meticulously accurate and authentic.

Because of Jewish supremacy in the press, we simply don't get the real
view of the world. We get the view the Jewish supremacists want us to
see. It is unbelievable that they even altered some of the most basic
tenants of the Christian faith, and they have too many Christians
listening to the Jewish interpretations of the New Testament rather
than its own clear words on the subject.

As a Christian it pains me that so many who profess to be Christians
have supported the horrible crimes inflicted on the Palestinians, many
of whom are our fellow Christians. These so called Christians reject
the love and compassion of Christ in the same ways they Jews have for
2000 years rejected his message of peace and reconciliation. They have
even allowed the Jewish supremacist, Christ-haters to twist the words
of our own Holy Bible because they know that that the Jewish
broadcasting moguls would pull the plug if they dared to tell the real
Christian view of Jewish supremacism.

How long will American Christians continue to support the Anti-Christ
of Jewish Supremacism?

It reminds of the one of the most often repeated phrases in the New
Testament: "fear of the Jews," as expressed in John 7:13

Yet for fear of the Jews no one spoke openly of him (John 7:13)

Recently it was revealed that Billy Graham in conversations with
President Nixon said that the Jewish stranglehold on the American
media was destroying our country. Must their stranglehold destroy the
basic tenants of our Christian faith as well? Even Graham and Nixon
dared not speak openly about the Jewish stranglehold on our country.

It is simply amazing to me that some fundamentalist Christians have
been fooled into aligning themselves with anti-Christian Jews, the
very same forces that stand against everything that Christians stand
for in America.

The same pro-Israel, Jewish supremacist mass media and Hollywood
establishment that Graham railed against with Nixon in private, is the
same one that continually attacks and ridicules Christianity and
Christian ethics. The same Jewish media that supports Israel supports
abortion, something that almost all fundamentalist Christians oppose.
The Jewish supremacists must have a good laugh as they get the money
and support from people who they ridicule and debase in their mass
media. That same Jewish media supports radical feminism and blatant
homosexuality. That same Jewish media that supports unlimited Third
World immigration in America, supports the Jews Only Israeli policy.
When will the blind Christians wake up?

Is it Moslems in the American media who are destroying Christian
ethics? As Billy Graham said it is the Jewish stranglehold on media
that is doing that. The truth is that devout Moslems have the same
opinion toward abortion, homosexuality, feminism and other moral
issues as the fundamentalist Christians, but in the ultimate con job,
the Jews have got the Christians busily defending them and hating the
Moslems. They have even got Christians supporting the Jewish murder
and ethnic cleansing of their fellow Christian Palestinians.

Although I respect all religions and the right of every man or woman
to believe or not believe according to their own intellect and
conscience, I am a Christian.

I am a Christian who defends my faith and my fellow Christians. It is
not Moslems who have led the fight to remove even Christmas carols
from American schools. I have not and will not sell my soul to the
Jews for their thirty pieces of silver. To do so I must oppose the
evil of Israel. I will not let quote "fear of the Jews" stop me from
telling and spreading the truth. The same evil that is destroying the
Palestinian nation is destroying the American nation. The time has
come to stand up for the truth. Again, the whole truth and nothing but
the truth!

Won't you join me?

Christians, Moslems, anyone of any faith who loves truth and justice,
together we can change the world.

This has been David Duke …sharing my most recent thoughts."


http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
Alric Knebel
2006-04-04 17:30:56 UTC
Permalink
[copy-paste article deleted]
No matter how many times you copy and paste the same few articles, your
reality is not altered one bit: YOU are inferior to most of humankind,
be they black, red, straight, gay -- whatever. In fact, that you can't
defend your supremacist ideology with your own thoughts proves my point,
that you're an empty-headed weakling, a man of inferior quality and
fiber, having nothing really to contribute; nothing to contribute, that
is, beyond shouting "Here!" when you hear your name at roll call down at
the weekly bunker meetings. Goaded by your awareness of your
inferiority, you exploit this supremacist ideology because it allows you
to hide your individual shortcomings within the perceived
accomplishments of the white race. You're a white supremacist because
your WHITENESS turns out to be the only estimated asset you have to
promote, and any esteem you have hinges solely on your forsaking your
individuality. By promoting it (your whiteness) -- with its alleged
higher IQ averages and subsequent inventiveness -- you subsume your
identity into the history of the white race, coattailing on the
achievements of others by conscripting them into your white collective.
In reality, you exist on the fringes of humanity, regardless of your
race, on the most primitive margins, and unfit for the future of
humanity. Those are the facts, my little goose-stepper. If you don't
take steps to reclaim your individuality, you're going to die a
gibbering nitwit, as ignorant as the day you were born. Yours will be a
life unlived, undeveloped, mired in a primitive ideology, and unaware of
the splendor of the modern world, the potential for humanity's future. A
willfully sad, sad case indeed.
--
Alric Knebel
http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com
Alric Knebel
2006-04-04 17:30:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by R***@hotmail.com
I'm not Jewish, but I'm disgusted by this shit you write.
Let me tell you something. I've watched this man post the same stuff
for years. Literally the same stuff, copied and pasted. Sometimes I
kill file him, and sometimes I harass him and make fun of him. I never
try to talk rational with him, and you're wasting your time trying in
your attempts now. He is literally too stupid to understand a thing
you're saying. I advise you to go to the nearest street corner and talk
to a fire hydrant: the fire hydrant has more sense.
--
Alric Knebel
http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com
R***@hotmail.com
2006-04-05 02:19:30 UTC
Permalink
Some things just need to be stated, regardless of whether people ever
read them. Regardless of whether people ever comprehend or even care.
Alric Knebel
2006-04-05 10:09:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by R***@hotmail.com
Some things just need to be stated, regardless of whether people ever
read them. Regardless of whether people ever comprehend or even care.
Yes, yes. And I agree wholeheartedly. I just thought I'd tell you how
he is. I've decided to answer his cut-and-paste with my own. That way
I can harangue him while putting as much thought into it all as he does.
The big difference, I wrote my own material. And when I get tired of
it, I change it. He can't do that, and that's the fun. Can you imagine
that: HE is what he imagines as "superior."
--
Alric Knebel
http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com
Topaz
2006-04-06 01:30:09 UTC
Permalink
"Since President Bush has dedicated our total economic output, and our
total military to a policy of Israel first, not America first, he has
pushed us into massive debt, gotten us chained to a disastrous and
counterproductive war that will have no positive end, and wants to
stave poor Americans to pay for his bad decisions and his perverted
ego
trip. Hillary Clinton is on the same page as Bush and has dedicated
herself to the State of Israel as her God above all. America has
become a nation of the Jews, by the Jews, and for the Jews. The Jews
have the money and since our Government runs on money, not on votes,
our leaders do not care if they destroy the world defending Israel's
illegal ability to ethnically cleanse Palestinians from Palestine,
their own home. Because Palestinians are trying to defend their legal
home against an illegal occupation which we have financed for over
fifty years, we brand them as "terrorists." Bush, the Evangelicals,
and Neoconservative Democrats like Hillary Clinton do not give a
tinkers damn about our Constitution, our freedom, and our sovereignty.

Our real enemy is AIPAC, the America Israel Public Affairs Committee,
which runs Washington. The reason they are getting away with this is
that most Christian Americans are idiots, pure and simple. Israel is
our OWNER, not our "ally," and America is a Jewish owned corporation,
not a "democracy." Wake up! The American people are dull and stupid
and easily tricked, and now we are paying the price for our ridiculous
Zionist constructed view of the world, where Israel always comes
first,
even before God, our own children, our economy, international law,
basic human rights, multiple UN Resolutions, and our national
sovereignty, which we have lost.

Bush has done far more damage to America than Osama bin Laden Bin
Laden
ever has. Bush has killed more innocent people, wasted more money
(over half a trillion dollars), and effectively wiped his ass with the
United States Constitution, which is far worse than burning our flag.
George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin would hate
Bush and his Neoconservative/Zionist movement, which has destroyed
everything our founding leaders wanted. Our founding fathers made
allot of terrible mistakes, but at least they believed in America
first, not Britain first, and they certainly would not give a damn
about Israel, a nation based on an un-American and anti-American
philosophy. Israel wants to drain us dry, to use us in every way
possible for their own dishonest and illegal gain, and anyone who
opposes them is destroyed by the US media, which is so Zionist
dominated that few voices of dissent are ever heard. Americans are
free to worship Israel any way they want, as long as they worship
Israel first as our God and Master. Israel and the Zionists are
exactly equivalent to George Orwell's "BIG BROTHER" in our society.
We
have given all power and control to them, and have destroyed anyone
who
murmurs the slightest dissent, and then we have the nerve to bomb and
illegally invade other countries in the name of "freedom." We murder
for "freedom," we torture for "freedom," we plant false stories in the
press for "freedom," and we spy on our own citizens illegally for
"freedom." Orwellian doublespeak is rampant!

IB

http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
Alric Knebel
2006-04-09 00:38:38 UTC
Permalink
[copy-paste article deleted]
No matter how many times you copy and paste the same few articles, your
reality is not altered one bit: YOU are inferior to most of humankind,
be they black, red, straight, gay -- whatever. In fact, that you can't
defend your supremacist ideology with your own thoughts proves my point,
that you're an empty-headed weakling, a man of inferior quality and
fiber, having nothing really to contribute; nothing to contribute, that
is, beyond shouting "Here!" when you hear your name at roll call down at
the weekly bunker meetings. Goaded by your awareness of your
inferiority, you exploit this supremacist ideology because it allows you
to hide your individual shortcomings within the perceived
accomplishments of the white race. You're a white supremacist because
your WHITENESS turns out to be the only estimated asset you have to
promote, and any esteem you have hinges solely on your forsaking your
individuality. By promoting it (your whiteness) -- with its alleged
higher IQ averages and subsequent inventiveness -- you subsume your
identity into the history of the white race, coattailing on the
achievements of others by conscripting them into your white collective.
In reality, you exist on the fringes of humanity, regardless of your
race, on the most primitive margins, and unfit for the future of
humanity. Those are the facts, my little goose-stepper. If you don't
take steps to reclaim your individuality, you're going to die a
gibbering nitwit, as ignorant as the day you were born. Yours will be a
life unlived, undeveloped, mired in a primitive ideology, and unaware of
the splendor of the modern world, the potential for humanity's future. A
willfully sad, sad case indeed.
--
Alric Knebel
http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com
R***@hotmail.com
2006-04-06 03:22:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alric Knebel
Post by R***@hotmail.com
Some things just need to be stated, regardless of whether people ever
read them. Regardless of whether people ever comprehend or even care.
Yes, yes. And I agree wholeheartedly. I just thought I'd tell you how
he is. I've decided to answer his cut-and-paste with my own. That way
I can harangue him while putting as much thought into it all as he does.
The big difference, I wrote my own material. And when I get tired of
it, I change it. He can't do that, and that's the fun. Can you imagine
that: HE is what he imagines as "superior."
--
Alric Knebel
http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com
The greatest victory is when someone like him steps into the light of
truth and admits that he was wrong.

It is my hope that he will lay down the hate, the nonsense, and think
more soberly about the horrors of this world and the potential
greatness of mankind.
Topaz
2006-04-06 23:01:19 UTC
Permalink
Why They Hate Us
by Joseph Sobran

Western man towers over the rest of the world in ways so
large as to be almost inexpressible. It's Western
exploration, science, and conquest that have revealed the
world to itself. Other races feel like subjects of Western
power long after colonialism, imperialism, and slavery have
disappeared. The charge of racism puzzles whites who feel
not hostility, but only baffled good will, because they
don't grasp what it really means: humiliation. The white
man presents an image of superiority even when he isn't
conscious of it. And superiority excites envy. Destroying
white civilization is the inmost desire of the league of
designated victims we call 'minorities.'

From Sobran's Newsletter, April 1997



http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
R***@hotmail.com
2006-04-07 04:12:06 UTC
Permalink
There are lots of people who do hate whites. Sure there are.

But ya know what - I dont give a shit about those idiots either.

If you judge people based on race then you are an idiot no matter what
color you are.
Topaz
2006-04-08 01:14:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by R***@hotmail.com
There are lots of people who do hate whites. Sure there are.
But ya know what - I dont give a shit about those idiots either.
If you judge people based on race then you are an idiot no matter what
color you are.
"I was listening to a speech that he gave in Sweden. You can listen at
the
Url below if ya want. http://www.davidduke.com/

Anyway, the guy made an analogy that sums it all up.

He said, lets look at Iceland. They have one of the worlds lowest
crime rates, and have some of the worlds highest test scores.

He then went on to say: Haiti is rich in natural resources, they have
great weather, beaches etc.. Yet its a murder, rape capital of the
world. etc, etc.

He went on to say: If we were to take all of the people from Haiti &
Move them to Iceland, Well, they would soon die.

Take those from Iceland and move them to Haiti and within one
generation Haiti would be paradise on earth.

He explained it better than I did. But you should get the gist of the
Iceland / Haiti analogy. Better yet, listen to the Stockholm speech
and hear it for yourself.."

Tommy

http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
Chris Morton
2006-04-07 12:27:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
Why They Hate Us
When will Nazis get beyond child molestation?
--
--
Gun control, the theory that 110lb. women should have to fistfight with 210lb.
rapists.
R***@hotmail.com
2006-04-07 14:00:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chris Morton
Post by Topaz
Why They Hate Us
When will Nazis get beyond child molestation?
Well, the topic is race.

But the Nazis did molest plenty of kids. In fact, I think that Dr.
Goebbels was very fond of molesting children at Auschwitz - if my
memory serves correctly -

German porn in those days was also very interesting from an artistic
point of view. Rather a blend of Victorian idealism, and art deco, I
guess you could call it Bauhaus porn. They used teenage girls quite
often.
Chris Morton
2006-04-07 17:27:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by R***@hotmail.com
Post by Chris Morton
Post by Topaz
Why They Hate Us
When will Nazis get beyond child molestation?
Well, the topic is race.
The larger overall topic is the degeneracy of Nazis. From Ernst Roehm to
Kaminski to Frank Collin, pedophilia has been the hallmark of National
Socialism.
--
--
Gun control, the theory that 110lb. women should have to fistfight with 210lb.
rapists.
Topaz
2006-04-08 01:21:22 UTC
Permalink
Heinrich Himmler, Reichsfuhrer SS and head of the Gestapo said in a
speech in 1936 on the subect of homosexuality and execution of Ernst
Roehm (which he had engineered): "Two years ago...when it became
necessary, we did not scruple to strike this plague with death, even
within our own ranks." Himmler closed with these words: "Just as we
today have gone back to the ancient Germanic view on the question of
marriage mixing different
races, so too in our judgement of homosexuality, a symptom of
degeneracy which could destroy our race, we must return to the
guiding Nordic principle: extermination of degenerates"


http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
R***@hotmail.com
2006-04-08 03:48:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chris Morton
Post by R***@hotmail.com
Post by Chris Morton
Post by Topaz
Why They Hate Us
When will Nazis get beyond child molestation?
Well, the topic is race.
The larger overall topic is the degeneracy of Nazis. From Ernst Roehm to
Kaminski to Frank Collin, pedophilia has been the hallmark of National
Socialism.
There were plenty who were pedophiles, but I get the feeling that it
was probably not considered a crime if the victim was one of their
target groups.

If a German molested an Aryan child he probably would have been killed.
But for molesting Jews or Poles or communists, they probably did not
care one bit. Probably would not be prosecuted.

It is a very interesting subject really - to look at the double
standards which were so exaggerated - really absurd distortions of law.
The Nazis really perfected that.
Topaz
2006-04-08 01:19:48 UTC
Permalink
Here are some quotes from the German pamphlet "How they Lie" from
1940. The pamphlet has many pictures but the words alone are
interesting enough:
"For example, what would you say if a colleague of yours, whom you
regarded as a rival and who disliked you, were to spread the rumor
that your household is in disorder, that you murder small children and
rape defenseless women? Rest assured that in our country such a person
would soon be behind bars.
But the international politicians and journalists who slander entire
peoples in a shameless manner not only run around freely, they
impudently put on airs as the saviors of human culture. No lie is too
crude for them, no slander too vulgar-they understand their craft.
Even in World War I they knew how to incite hate with the help of
atrocity propaganda. We all recall those daily lies of the "German
barbarian" who, "like a wild beast rages over the earth and destroys
everything in hate and the fury of annihilation, who tortures children
and delights in the tears of mothers," as a foreign paper once wrote.
In war, man stands against man. Each serves the Fatherland in his own
way, and no soldier will deny the knightly convictions of a noble
opponent. Today, however, a cowardly gang of professional agitators
daily invents new lies and pictures from the safety of their desks.
How was the German soldier once depicted by enemy atrocity propaganda?
We all know them, for we had fathers, brothers, sons, and men out
there. For instance, on 20 March 1915, the newspaper "Le Rire Rouge"
published the following picture of the good German soldier:
A bloodthirsty murderer of women and children, a robber and plunderer,
who nourishes himself with sausages made from human flesh-that was how
it saw the brave and loyal German soldier.
Each of us knows what a crude and baseless lie this is. Every decent
person in the world should have known this. And yet: "Some of it will
always be believed, the stupid and gullible will never see through it
all" - so hope the political liars and slanderers.
We know what to think about this flood of slander flowing over the
German people. We heard the same things between 1914 and 1918. Then as
now, they are attempting to drive a wedge between leaders and people.
The goal of this propaganda is always the annihilation of Germany.
We are also familiar with the old lie about the desecration of
churches and shrines, which are once again in fashion with our
enemies.
This is the undamaged cathedral of Tschenstochau.
The picture of the Polish shrine of the Black Madonna, with the German
soldiers in the foreground, was taken after its alleged destruction by
German bombers.
While the lying and yellow press of the entire world and the enemy
transmitters were inventing hypocritical stories about the presumed
destruction of the holy shrine, the Prior of Tschenstochau wrote the
above letter to the German military authorities that clearly testifies
that the monastery and holy shrine were untouched.
Thus the lie regarding supposed German attack could be immediately
exposed. The English Ministry of Advertising has had nothing to say
since.
In reality, these lies are ancient. Our enemies always babble about
violated sanctuaries, persecuted priests, murdered children and
tortured women in order to prejudice the world against Germany and to
arouse the impression that the world must be defended against "the
barbarians who are threatening human culture."
The picture above is taken from a leafet dated 19 August 1914. The
same lie was used back then. Supposedly the Germans had attacked the
monastery at Jasno-Gora.
They always lied, they lie today, they lie, they lie.
There were countless numbers of these malicious pictures in World War
I. Today we see the new versions of this crude charge. Enemy radio
reports reports of drugged candy and poison gas-filled children's
balloons, with which German troops allegedly killed Polish children.
And our enemies decided to spread this vile slander in the exact
moment that the world heard from neutral journalists about the
unimaginable crimes perpetrated by the Polish on fellow German
countrymen. All of these neutral independent reporters saw and
corroborated the terrible atrocities against Germans with their own
eyes. In light of these proven facts, the shameless enemy presumes to
turn the tables and pin these murders on the Germans, declaring that
the murdered, whose names and addresses are known, are Poles.
They hate the Führer, because he exposes their lies and crimes.
They hate him, because he rescued the hard-working German people from
eploitation. How happy they would be to see the Führer and the entire
German people delivered into the dark machinations of the world
Jewry! It shows the impotence of the Jews, since all they can do is
drag a straw man through the streets and burn it.
What do these subhumans know about the joy of a genuine national
community? These warmongers are hard at work rousing the world against
Germany. How little they know about the indisoluble bond between
Führer and people that is so overwhelmingly clear in this picture:
The Führer speaks with German workers.
He knows that he can trust them, and they know that our cause is in
his good hands.
The enemy countries, who are so worried about the fate of the German
people, also worry about the S. A.
We have often seen them; we know how these men look. They are our
comrades, our colleagues in the workplace, our fathers, brothers, sons
and men.
Do they look like this? Since when are these imagined daggers the true
symbol of the S. A.? Once again some professional liar has taken his
pen in his hand.
They lie, they lie....
German men from all regions and occupations use their free time and
energy in regular practice, so they can be ready to serve the
community. When in the summer of 1939 the agricultural labor force was
too small to bring in the rich harvest, these men freely joined in to
help with the harvest, serving the homeland on peaceful fields. Why
does the enemy press, which loves to speak of its objective reporting,
never carry such pictures of Germany?
The more one examines their endless scribbling and radio news, the
clearer one sees that these expert liars have never spoken the truth,
not even once.
This time a newspaper really outdid itself. Here we see how a German
holiday is libeled.
Christmas and Nazi Winter Relief
We all know this picture. It is the Christmas celebration of a German
family that did not have the means by itself to celebrate this holiday
of love in the way the Führer wishes, in the way that every German
family should experience.
The NSV got involved.
Helpers, men and women, walked upstairs and downstairs, heard the
wishes of the needy, and provided gifts.
We all know the results. In any case, the 80 million people of the
greater German Reich know that the liar who drew the picture on the
previous page of an alleged German Christmas is not only a liar but
also an idiot. If the gentlemen wanted to lie, they should have at
least started out more intelligently, so that they were not found out
immediately.
What National Socialist Germany has done and continues to do for
working people is unique in the entire world.
The foreign plutocratic countries that are dominated by high finance
viewed this new and happy life with envy and ill-will. They never
ceased in their endeavor to compel this new Germany into war, to keep
it in the same miserable state it was in after the Treaty of
Versailles.
But Germany knows what it has to lose. And because it is stronger than
the rest of the world, it will end this struggle victoriously.
Mr. Churchill, English warmonger, First Lord of the Admiralty,
architect of the encirclement campaign had it easy in the fall of
1939.
When he decided to wage war against Germany, he selected four English
passenger ships that were sailing to America. Then he sent the above
telegram, dated 28 August 1939, to Cunard White Star Lines, compelling
them to turn German passengers away from these ships, as they would be
uncomfortable eyewitnesses. See the accompanying letter from the
shipping company, dated 29 August 1939. Churchill then sent suitable
"rescue ships" to be "coincidentally" on the course of these ships,
which were now loaded with Americans. The Athenia was torpedoed and
sunk. If the affair with the "Athenia" not worked, then one of the
other three ships would have been sunk,so that Mr. Churchill would
have more stories for the English Ministry of Lies.
We know the rest. The yellow press of the world blows Churchill's
lying horn obediently: a German submarine allegedly sank the
"Athenia."
But the evil, criminal escapade failed. Germany got hold of the
documents and exposed the criminals.
Once again, one of the vilest and most base of the English lies is
exposed.
The following story is perhaps the best way of showing the reality of
moneybags journalism, and how decent foreign journalists are forced to
invent lie afer lie.
A couple of months ago, a foreign journalist whose name we must hide
in order to protect his job, came to Germany. He wanted to see the
alleged "Nazi hell" with his own eyes, in order to give an eyewitness
account.
He saw workers who had jobs. He saw workers taking vacations with the
KdF. And he saw workers going to the theater. He saw the NSV's charity
for the poor. He saw and was amazed.
He had not expected to see that! How could he, knowing the truth,
continue to write lies and false atrocity stories about Germany, like
the financiers of his newspaper want it?...
In German camps, criminals and misfits live in clean and orderly
accommodations, receive sufficient nourishment and have enough time
for both work and play.
The foreign press reporter visited one of these camps.
The officials of the German concentration camp were outraged when they
later read his article.
The article talked about piles of corpses over which the poor reporter
had to climb, of moaning people in dark dungeons, of caning orgies and
other such imaginary atrocities.
The man had seemed so honest. How could he lie like that? What had
happened? The journalist wrote a letter to explain. He had written a
truthful account of what he had seen at the concentration camp.
But the owner of the newspaper switched everything around. Naturally
there are decent foreign papers that would never falsify the facts
like that, but we are not talking about them here.
The newspaperman begged the Germans not to take action against his
paper or the publisher who falsified the report, because then he would
lose his job.
That is how freedom of the press looks like in other countries; that
is how the lies and fairy tales come to be.
The Führer spoke about the criminal newspaper Jews and the war
profiteers, in his speech on 6 October. They order the journalists and
radio reporters around like schoolboys. These "servants of public
opinion" are not allowed to have convictions or express their true
opinions, and only a very few exceptions prove this rule. They must
lie and slander and blacken Germany and its Führer to keep the
gentlemen behind the plutocratic, moneybag policies in business.
But why do these newspaper moneybags lie so crudely, so stupidly, so
impudently? Why do they spread their slander all over Germany of all
places?
They lie because they are weak and Germany is strong. They lie because
they want to make money by going to war against Germany, even though
the people do not want to go to war and are scared to go to war
against a strong Germany...
Things are a thousand times better here. Things are more honest and
fair here than anywhere in the entire world.
Here we recognize the honor of the worker.
Here there is a right to work.
Here the moneybags are not in control...
In conclusion:
We will not be confused by the lies of the foreign countries! We know
what we are fighting for!



http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
Topaz
2006-04-08 01:19:07 UTC
Permalink
By Dr. William Pierce
http://www.natvan.com

"The Jews were very influential in Germany after the First World War.
They were strongly entrenched in the legal profession, in banking, in
advertising and merchandising, in show business, in organized vice, in
publishing and other media. They were trying hard to change the spirit
of Germany. They were pushing modernism in art, music, and literature.
They were pushing for "diversity" and "tolerance." They were
ridiculing German tradition and culture and morality and the German
sense of personal honor, trying hard to make young Germans believe
that it was "cool" to be rootless and cosmopolitan. They were
promoting the same culture of lies that they have been promoting here.

That was the so-called "Weimar" period, because right after the First
World War some important government business, including the
ratification of a new German constitution, took place in the city of
Weimar. The Jews loved the Weimar period, but it was, in fact, the
most degenerate period in Germany's history. The Jews, of course,
didn't think of it as
degenerate. They thought of it as "modern" and "progressive" and
"cool." Really, it was a very Jewish period, where lying was
considered a virtue. The Jews were riding high. Many books have been
written by Jews in America about Weimar Germany, all praising it to
the skies and looking back on it with nostalgia. Even without the
so-called
"Holocaust," they never have forgiven the Nazis for bringing an end to
the Weimar period.

There was a Hollywood film made 30 years ago, in 1972, about Weimar
Germany. The film was called Cabaret, and it starred Liza Minelli. It
depicted Berlin night life, with all its degeneracy, including the
flourishing of homosexuality, and also depicted the fight between the
communists and the Jews and the other proponents of modernism on the
one
hand and the Nazis on the other hand. The Hollywood filmmakers, of
course, were solidly on the side of the degenerates and portrayed the
Nazis as the bad guys, but this film is another example of the Jews
outsmarting themselves. The Jews who made the film saw everything from
their viewpoint, through their own eyes, and the degenerate Gentiles
under their spell also saw things from the Jewish viewpoint, but the
Jews apparently didn't stop to think -- or didn't care -- that a
normal, healthy White person would view things differently. Check it
out for yourself. Cabaret is still available in video stores.

The point I am making is this: In the 1920s, after the First World
War, the Jews were trying to do to Germany what they began doing to
America after the Second World War, in the 1960s. Many Germans, the
healthiest elements in Germany, resisted the Jews' efforts, just as
many Americans have resisted the Jews' efforts in America. In Germany
the Jews were a bit premature. Although they had much of the media
under their control,
they didn't control all of the media. They tried to move too fast. The
healthiest Germans resisted and beat them.

In America, in the 1960s, the Jews had almost total media control
before they began their big push, and they proceeded more carefully.
In America they are winning. The culture of lies has prevailed in
America. It's still possible for Americans to win, but it's going to
be a lot tougher this time. We'd better get started. The first step is
to regain at least partial control of our media, so that we can begin
contradicting the lies. This American Dissident Voices broadcast is a
part of that first step."


http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
Alric Knebel
2006-04-09 00:39:06 UTC
Permalink
[copy-paste article deleted]
No matter how many times you copy and paste the same few articles, your
reality is not altered one bit: YOU are inferior to most of humankind,
be they black, red, straight, gay -- whatever. In fact, that you can't
defend your supremacist ideology with your own thoughts proves my point,
that you're an empty-headed weakling, a man of inferior quality and
fiber, having nothing really to contribute; nothing to contribute, that
is, beyond shouting "Here!" when you hear your name at roll call down at
the weekly bunker meetings. Goaded by your awareness of your
inferiority, you exploit this supremacist ideology because it allows you
to hide your individual shortcomings within the perceived
accomplishments of the white race. You're a white supremacist because
your WHITENESS turns out to be the only estimated asset you have to
promote, and any esteem you have hinges solely on your forsaking your
individuality. By promoting it (your whiteness) -- with its alleged
higher IQ averages and subsequent inventiveness -- you subsume your
identity into the history of the white race, coattailing on the
achievements of others by conscripting them into your white collective.
In reality, you exist on the fringes of humanity, regardless of your
race, on the most primitive margins, and unfit for the future of
humanity. Those are the facts, my little goose-stepper. If you don't
take steps to reclaim your individuality, you're going to die a
gibbering nitwit, as ignorant as the day you were born. Yours will be a
life unlived, undeveloped, mired in a primitive ideology, and unaware of
the splendor of the modern world, the potential for humanity's future. A
willfully sad, sad case indeed.
--
Alric Knebel
http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com
Topaz
2006-04-06 01:28:45 UTC
Permalink
"BOTH Republicans AND Democrats are hypocrites and cowards, because
both have sold out America and the American gross domestic product
(GDP) to Israel. The United States does not exist anymore as a
sovereign entity and all our energy, all our societal efforts are
dedicated to supporting Israel first, Israel second, and Israel third.
America is a Jew-ocracy that is run for the Jews, by the Jews, and of
the Jews, because America is a Jewish owned corporation, not a
"democracy." Votes don't matter much here in the USA because
Washington runs on money, not on votes, and Democratic presidential
candidate Senator Hillary Clinton is just as sold out to the Israeli
lobby, AIPAC (the America Israel Public Affairs Committee), as
Republican presidential candidate Senator Bill Frist. Former
president Bill Clinton was sold out, Jimmy Carter was sold out and
later admitted it after he left office, Ronald Reagan was sold out,
all American presidents were sold out going back to JFK…
All our Middle East problems, our vast national debt, our collapsing
economy, and our collapsing standard of living are all directly the
result of our blind support for Israel's illegal ethnic cleansing of
Palestinians from Palestine. Bush used Israeli torture techniques on
Moslems, our leaders have let Israeli agents here in the USA illegally
spy on American citizens, we ignore UN Resolutions that tell Israel
to go retreat to their 1967 borders as international law mandates. We
routinely block the United Nations from taking action against Israel's
illegal activities. We gave Israel plutonium and helped them build
their atomic and hydrogen bombs, we shoveled Israel over 140 billion
in foreign aid since 1950, and we have wasted 3 to 4 trillion dollars
in total on the cult of Zionism since 1950 through the cost of illegal
wars, oil embargoes, foreign aid, and the cost of the strategic oil
reserve. Frankly, the Jews are bleeding America dry and no one is
courageous enough to stand up to the Jews because Jews in America are
the exact equivalent of George Orwell's BIG BROTHER. Jews tell us all
what to do, what we are allowed to think, and what we are allowed to
speak. Jews control our government, dominate our media, and crush any
opposition by slandering those with legitimate and provable complaints
as "anti-Semites."
It must be great to be above criticism and to control the stupid and
dull Christian masses and laugh at them behind their backs and even to
their faces and get no response other than more feet licking, bowing,
and kow towing. George Bush is a useful idiot, a water carrier for
the Jews just as Hillary Clinton will be if elected president. Both
Iraq wars were started for the Jews and by the Jews. All our
politicians are a disgrace and we will never regain our sovereignty,
solve our foreign policy problems, or balance our budget until we end
our slavish allegiance to the immoral, racist, murdering, torturing,
lying, stealing, manipulating cult nation of Israel.
The Holocaust business feeds the Zionist cult and Hollywood has
deified Jews while vilifying Moslems… Our nation is a lying,
hypocritical mess and the world hates us because the world knows we
are a nation of morons run by Jews. Where are the brave and honest
Americans who speak with one face, not two? Americans are defeated,
weak, foolish, and can't even speak out because they are scared like
little girls, unable to even speak the word "Jew" unless in praise or
on bended knees. Imagine if Catholics or Moonies or the Mafia had that
much control in America! Jews are not above the law and Jews can be
opposed for their real world crimes just like anyone else. Our brains
are frozen by decades of media programming and propaganda so that now
we cannot even speak the "J word." Political correctness, which was
invented by Jews as a form of mind control, prevents Americans from
being fully human. We are a nation of slaves, licking Jewish feet day
after day and we never get tired of it. It's a sad and pathetic
situation and we are a sad and pathetic people who deserve the
contempt of the world because we have no backbone and no honesty.
The United Kingdom is little better than the USA because Tony Blair is
a rabid Christian Zionist himself and most of his top advisors are
Jews. Much of Europe is sold out and controlled by Jews and the cult
of Zionism has Western leaders by the testicles, frozen and unable to
fight back. Now is the time to speak up, to fight back, and to do it
legally, responsibly, and effectively. Just decide that from now on
Jews have no special privileges in your brain and that you can
criticize Jews just like Republicans, Democrats, Catholics, Moonies,
or any other group. Jews act as a 90% unified group, commit crimes as
a 90% unified group, and control America as a 90% unified group, and
thus deserve to be criticized as a 90% unified group. Being able to
criticize those who do harm is what democracy means and is exactly
what freedom of thought means. Become a fully functioning human being
and not just another mind controlled blob of useless DNA!"
inkyblacks

http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
Alric Knebel
2006-04-09 00:39:25 UTC
Permalink
[copy-paste article deleted]
No matter how many times you copy and paste the same few articles, your
reality is not altered one bit: YOU are inferior to most of humankind,
be they black, red, straight, gay -- whatever. In fact, that you can't
defend your supremacist ideology with your own thoughts proves my point,
that you're an empty-headed weakling, a man of inferior quality and
fiber, having nothing really to contribute; nothing to contribute, that
is, beyond shouting "Here!" when you hear your name at roll call down at
the weekly bunker meetings. Goaded by your awareness of your
inferiority, you exploit this supremacist ideology because it allows you
to hide your individual shortcomings within the perceived
accomplishments of the white race. You're a white supremacist because
your WHITENESS turns out to be the only estimated asset you have to
promote, and any esteem you have hinges solely on your forsaking your
individuality. By promoting it (your whiteness) -- with its alleged
higher IQ averages and subsequent inventiveness -- you subsume your
identity into the history of the white race, coattailing on the
achievements of others by conscripting them into your white collective.
In reality, you exist on the fringes of humanity, regardless of your
race, on the most primitive margins, and unfit for the future of
humanity. Those are the facts, my little goose-stepper. If you don't
take steps to reclaim your individuality, you're going to die a
gibbering nitwit, as ignorant as the day you were born. Yours will be a
life unlived, undeveloped, mired in a primitive ideology, and unaware of
the splendor of the modern world, the potential for humanity's future. A
willfully sad, sad case indeed.
--
Alric Knebel
http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com
Alric Knebel
2006-04-04 17:25:20 UTC
Permalink
[copy-paste article deleted]
No matter how many times you copy and paste the same few articles, your
reality is not altered one bit: YOU are inferior to most of humankind,
be they black, red, straight, gay -- whatever. In fact, that you can't
defend your supremacist ideology with your own thoughts proves my point,
that you're an empty-headed weakling, a man of inferior quality and
fiber, having nothing really to contribute; nothing to contribute, that
is, beyond shouting "Here!" when you hear your name at roll call down at
the weekly bunker meetings. Goaded by your awareness of your
inferiority, you exploit this supremacist ideology because it allows you
to hide your individual shortcomings within the perceived
accomplishments of the white race. You're a white supremacist because
your WHITENESS turns out to be the only estimated asset you have to
promote, and any esteem you have hinges solely on your forsaking your
individuality. By promoting it (your whiteness) -- with its alleged
higher IQ averages and subsequent inventiveness -- you subsume your
identity into the history of the white race, coattailing on the
achievements of others by conscripting them into your white collective.
In reality, you exist on the fringes of humanity, regardless of your
race, on the most primitive margins, and unfit for the future of
humanity. Those are the facts, my little goose-stepper. If you don't
take steps to reclaim your individuality, you're going to die a
gibbering nitwit, as ignorant as the day you were born. Yours will be a
life unlived, undeveloped, mired in a primitive ideology, and unaware of
the splendor of the modern world, the potential for humanity's future. A
willfully sad, sad case indeed.
--
Alric Knebel
http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com
R***@hotmail.com
2006-04-08 02:22:49 UTC
Permalink
I really feel sorry for people who limit themselves to their own color.

I have a friend who is from Mexico. We were talking about creating an
NPO or an NGO which would work like an annuity which is initially
funded by donations which would be used to help poor people in Mexico.

And you know, I had a real good feeling about doing something like
that. I mean, if you give money to the church, it wont be distributed
to the poor in most cases, mostly it just goes to the Vatican or
somewhere. And the foreign aid which we give to other countries all
gets spent on bombs. Then you have the scam artists who just pay
themselves big salaries and spend millions on infomercials.

If you set up a charitable annuity, you can help people get medical
treatment, education, improve industry, small business, whatever. The
average American can have a lot of leverage in helping the poor on
Mexico, but you really have to take a very aggressive hands on approach
otherwise your money is simply cast to the winds.

Well, the reason I mentioned it is because guys like Topaz will never
experience what a good thing it is - to have friends of other colors
who really are cool people.

Well, we might actually open an acct with Merril or Schwab or someone
and really do it. Depends on the laws. I think we have to do some
research, but it should be possible to do such a thing without breaking
the law.

It is fundamentally a subversive action to do something which the
Mexican Government should have done 50 years ago. Perhaps as much of an
attempt to help people as it is an effort to embarrass them as being
incompetent - I like the idea a whole lot.
R***@hotmail.com
2006-04-08 02:46:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by R***@hotmail.com
It is fundamentally a subversive action to do something which the
Mexican Government should have done 50 years ago. Perhaps as much of an
attempt to help people as it is an effort to embarrass them as being
incompetent - I like the idea a whole lot.
That is - to help the people and embarrass the "incompetent
government".

Just had to clarify that -
Topaz
2006-04-08 16:30:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by R***@hotmail.com
I really feel sorry for people who limit themselves to their own color.
The goal of race-mixing is to make one color. I am for preserving
the White race.
Post by R***@hotmail.com
I have a friend who is from Mexico. We were talking about creating an
NPO or an NGO which would work like an annuity which is initially
funded by donations which would be used to help poor people in Mexico.
And you know, I had a real good feeling about doing something like
that. I mean, if you give money to the church, it wont be distributed
to the poor in most cases, mostly it just goes to the Vatican or
somewhere. And the foreign aid which we give to other countries all
gets spent on bombs. Then you have the scam artists who just pay
themselves big salaries and spend millions on infomercials.
If you set up a charitable annuity, you can help people get medical
treatment, education, improve industry, small business, whatever. The
average American can have a lot of leverage in helping the poor on
Mexico, but you really have to take a very aggressive hands on approach
otherwise your money is simply cast to the winds.
Well, the reason I mentioned it is because guys like Topaz will never
experience what a good thing it is - to have friends of other colors
who really are cool people.
If they were cool they wouldn't mind us having a nation for White
people. If I went to Japan for example, I wouldn't try to be a citizen
or intermarry with Japanese. I would understand that I am a visiter. I
would be cool.
Post by R***@hotmail.com
Well, we might actually open an acct with Merril or Schwab or someone
and really do it. Depends on the laws. I think we have to do some
research, but it should be possible to do such a thing without breaking
the law.
It is fundamentally a subversive action to do something which the
Mexican Government should have done 50 years ago. Perhaps as much of an
attempt to help people as it is an effort to embarrass them as being
incompetent - I like the idea a whole lot.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...